Abstract
Despite the increasing popularity of environmental and sustainability management accounting (EMA) in corporate sustainability management, researchers in the sustainability accounting and sustainability management field neglect the importance and the relevance of national culture and its effect on the level of implementation of sustainability accounting and management practices. Yet, to our knowledge, there is no recent study of how national culture affects corporate environmental and sustainability management accounting practices in the different nations where they operate. In order to provide new insights into the link between national culture and EMA practice, we adopt Gray’s (1988) Abacus 24(1):1–15 theory of cultural relevance in national accounting systems. In brief, Gray proposed a framework to explain how national culture affects national accounting system using Hofstede’s (1986) The cultural context of accounting: accounting and culture. Paper presented to annual conference of the American Accounting Association, New York culture dimensions. An understanding of the national culture and its effect on the adoption and implementation of EMA can help us to improve the relevance of EMA practice and implementation in different countries. Based on Gray’s (1988) Abacus 24(1):1–15 framework, we develop the link between national cultural values and EMA values. As original contributions to sustainability accounting, we propose four EMA value dimensions (symbolic versus action, reactionary versus responsible, voluntary versus transparent, and integration versus differentiation).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baskerville R (2003) Hofstede never studied culture. Acc Org Soc 28:1–14
Baydoun N, Willett R (1995) Cultural relevance of Western Accounting Systems to developing countries. Abacus 31(1):67–92
Beekun RI, Hamdy R, Westerman JW, HassabElnaby HR (2008) An exploration of ethical decision-making processes in the United States and Egypt. J Bus Ethics 82(3):587–605
Bennett MJ, Bouma J, Walters T (2002) Environmental management accounting: informational and institutional developments. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Burritt R, Schaltegger S (2010) Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? Acc Audit Accountability 23(7):829–846
Burritt RL, Hahn T, Schaltegger S (2002a) An integrative framework of environmental management accounting – consolidating the different approaches of EMA into a common framework and terminology. In: Bennett MD, Bouma JJ, Wolters TJ (eds) Environmental management accounting: informational and institutional developments. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–35
Burritt RL, Hahn T, Schaltegger S (2002b) Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting: links between business actors and EMA tools. Aust Acc Rev 12(2):39–50
Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48
Chanchani S, MacGregor A (1999) A synthesis of cultural studies in accounting. J Acc Lit 18:1–30
Doupnik TS, Tsakumis GT (2004) A critical review of tests of Gray’s theory of cultural relevance and suggestions for future research. J Acc Lit 23:1–48
Frost GR, Wilmshurst TD (2000) The adoption of environment-related management accounting: an analysis of corporate environmental sensitivity. Acc Forum 24:344–365
Geletkanycz MA (1997) The salience of “culture’s consequences”: the effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strateg Manag J 18(8):615–634
Gotsi M, Wilson AM (2001) Corporate reputation: seeking a definition. Corp Comm Int J 6(1):24–30
Gray SJ (1988) Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus 24(1):1–15
Gray R (1992) Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Acc Org Soc 17(5):399–425
Hahn R, Reimsbach D, Schiemann F (2015) Organizations, climate change, and transparency: reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organ Environ 28(1):80–102
Harrison G, McKinnon J (1999) Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: a review of the current state. Acc Org Soc 24:483–506
Herzig C, Schaltegger S (2011) Corporate sustainability reporting. In: Godemann J, Michelsen G (eds) Sustainability communication: interdisciplinary perspectives and theoretical foundations. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 151–169
Hofstede GH (1983) The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. J Int Bus Stud 13:75–89
Hofstede GH (1986) The cultural context of accounting: accounting and culture. Paper presented to Annual Conference of the American Accounting Association, New York
Hofstede GH (1991) Cultures and organisations: software of the mind – intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill, London
Hofstede GH (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Hofstede GH (2007) Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pac J Manag 24(4):411–420
Hofstede GH (2015) The Hofstede Centre: strategy, culture, change. The Hofstede Centre, Helsinki
Hofstede G, Bond MH (1988) The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Org Dyn 16(4):5–21
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (1997) Cultures and organizations. McGraw Hill, New York
Hrasky S (2011) Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action? Accounting. Audit Account J 25(1):174–198
Husted BW (2005) Culture and ecology: a cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Manag Int Rev 45(3):349–371
Jarnagin C, Slocum J (2007) Creating corporate cultures through mythopoetic leadership. Org Dyn 36(3):288–302
Jermier JM, Slocum JW, Fry LW, Gaines J (1991) Organizational subcultures in a soft bureaucracy: resistance behind the myth and facade of an official culture. Organ Sci 2(2):170–194
Katz JP, Swanson DL, Nelson LK (2001) Culture-based expectations of corporate citizenship: a propositional framework and comparison of four cultures. Int J Organ Anal 9(2):149–171
Kim K, Park H, Suzuki N (1990) Reward allocations in the United States, Japan, and Korea: a comparison of individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Acad Manag J 33(1):188–198
Kim J, Bach SB, Clelland IJ (2007) Symbolic or behavioral management? Corporate reputation in high-emission industries. Corp Rep Rev 10(2):77–98
Kolk A (2008) Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Bus Strat Environ 17(1):1–15
Kolk A, Levy D, Pinkse J (2008) Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: the institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. Eur Acc Rev 17(4):719–745
KPMG (2014) Corporate sustainability: a progress report. Available at: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/corporate-sustainability-v2.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016
Lamberton G (2005) Sustainability accounting: a brief history and conceptual framework. Acc Forum 29(1):7–26
Lee K-H (2014) Globalization, green management and climate change in the Asia-Pacific economy. J Asia-Pac Bus 15(2):101–104
Lee K-H, Herold DM (2016) Cultural relevance in corporate sustainability management: a comparison between Korea and Japan. Asian J Sustain Soc Resp 1:1–21
Lee K-H, Herold DM, Yu AL (2016) Small and medium enterprises and corporate social responsibility practice: a Swedish perspective. Corp Soc Resp Env Manag 23(2):88–99
Lee K-H (2017) Does size matter? Evaluating corporate environmental disclosure in the Australian mining and metal industry: a combined approach of quantity and quality measurement. Bus Strateg Environ 26(2):209–223
Linnenluecke MK, Griffiths A (2010) Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. J World Bus 45(4):357–366
Lodhia S, Hess N (2014) Sustainability accounting and reporting in the mining industry: current literature and directions for future research. J Clean Prod 84:43–50
Martin J (2002) Organizational culture: mapping the terrain corporate social responsibility and environmental management. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Orij R (2010) Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Acc Audit Account J 23(7):868–889
Owen JR, Kemp D (2012) Assets, capitals, and resources frameworks for corporate community development. Min Bus Soc 51(3):382–408
Pezzoli K (1997) Sustainable development: a transdisciplinary overview of the literature. J Environ Plan Manag 40(5):549–574
Radebaugh LH (2014) Environmental factors influencing the development of accounting objectives, standards and practices in Peru. Int J Acc Edu Res 11(1):39–56
Radebaugh LH, Gray S (1993) International accounting and multinational enterprises. Wiley, New York
Salter S, Kang T, Gotti G, Doupnik T (2013) The role of social values, accounting values and institutions in determining accounting conservatism. Manag Int Rev 53(4):607–632
Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15
Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2000) Contemporary environmental accounting: issues, concepts and practice. Greenleaf Press, Sheffield
Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2010) Sustainability accounting for companies: catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? J World Bus 45(4):375–384
Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2015) Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: differentiating ethical motivations. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0
Schaltegger S, Hörisch J (2015) In search of the dominant rationale in sustainability management: legitimacy or profit-seeking? J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3
Schaltegger S, Gibassier D, Zvezdov D (2013) Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review. Meditari Acc Res 21(1):4–31
Scholtens B, Dam L (2007) Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. J Bus Ethics 75(3):273–284
SERI/WU (2014) Global material flow database, sustainable Europe Research Institute/Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna
Tsakumis G (2007) The influence of culture on accountants’ application of financial reporting rules. Abacus 43(1):27–48
Van der Laan Smith J, Adhikari A, Tondkar RH (2005) Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: a stakeholder perspective. J Acc Pub Policy 24(2):123–151
Williams G, Zinkin J (2008) The effect of culture on consumers’ willingness to punish irresponsible corporate behaviour: applying Hofstede’s typology to the punishment aspect of corporate social responsibility. Bus Ethics 17(2):210–226
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Yasunari T, Niles D, Taniguchi M, Chen D (2013) Asia: proving ground for global sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(3):288–292
Zvezdov D (2013) Rolling out corporate sustainability accounting: a set of challenges. J Env Sust 2(2):19–28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, KH., Herold, D.M. (2018). Cultural Relevance in Environmental and Sustainability Management Accounting (EMA) in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Link Between Cultural Values and Accounting Values Towards EMA Values. In: Lee, KH., Schaltegger, S. (eds) Accounting for Sustainability: Asia Pacific Perspectives. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70899-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70899-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70898-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70899-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)