Abstract
In the context of Linked Open Data, substantial progress has been made in mining of property subsumption and equivalence axioms. However, little progress has been made in determining if a predicate is symmetric or if its inverse exists within the data. Our study of popular linked datasets such as DBpedia, YAGO and their associated ontologies has shown that they contain very few inverse and symmetric property axioms. The state-of-the-art approach ignores the open-world nature of linked data and involves a time-consuming step of preparing the input for the rule-miner. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose a schema-agnostic unsupervised method to discover inverse and symmetric axioms from linked datasets. For mining inverse property axioms, we find that other than support and confidence scores, a new factor called predicate-preference factor (ppf) is useful and setting an appropriate threshold on ppf helps in mining quality axioms. We also introduce a novel mechanism, which also takes into account the semantic-similarity of predicates to rank-order candidate axioms. Using experimental evaluation, we show that our method discovers potential axioms with good accuracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Version 2015-10.
- 2.
It could very well be the minimum R-Score in \(R_A\).
- 3.
- 4.
Semantic Web Dog Food: http://data.semanticweb.org/.
- 5.
- 6.
References
Agresti, A., Coull, B.A.: Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am. Statist. 52(2), 119–126 (1998)
Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: DBpedia - a crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 7(3), 154–165 (2009)
Borgelt, C., Kruse, R.: Induction of association rules: apriori implementation. In: Härdle, W., Rönze, B. (eds.) Compstat, pp. 395–400. Physica, Heidelberg (2002)
Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Staab, S.: Comparing conceptual, divisive and agglomerative clustering for learning taxonomies from text. In: ECAI, vol. 16, p. 435 (2004)
De Nies, T., et al.: Normalized semantic web distance. In: Sack, H., Blomqvist, E., d’Aquin, M., Ghidini, C., Ponzetto, S.P., Lange, C. (eds.) ESWC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9678, pp. 69–84. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_5
Etzioni, O., Fader, A., Christensen, J., Soderland, S.: Mausam: open information extraction: the second generation. In: IJCAI, vol. 11, pp. 3–10 (2011)
Fleischhacker, D., Völker, J., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Mining RDF data for property axioms. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7566, pp. 718–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33615-7_18
Galárraga, L., Teflioudi, C., Hose, K., Suchanek, F.M.: Fast rule mining in ontological knowledge bases with AMIE+. VLDB J. 24, 707–730 (2015). Springer
Galárraga, L.A., Preda, N., Suchanek, F.M.: Mining rules to align knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Workshop on Automated Knowledge Base Construction, pp. 43–48. ACM (2013)
Jenks, G.: The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr. 7, 186–190 (1967)
Koutraki, M., Preda, N., Vodislav, D.: Online relation alignment for linked datasets. In: Blomqvist, E., Maynard, D., Gangemi, A., Hoekstra, R., Hitzler, P., Hartig, O. (eds.) ESWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10249, pp. 152–168. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_10
Lehmann, J.: DL-learner: learning concepts in description logics. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 2639–2642 (2009)
Petrucci, G., Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M.: Ontology learning in the deep. In: Blomqvist, E., Ciancarini, P., Poggi, F., Vitali, F. (eds.) EKAW 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10024, pp. 480–495. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_31
Ramakrishnan, C., Kochut, K.J., Sheth, A.P.: A framework for schema-driven relationship discovery from unstructured text. In: Cruz, I., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 583–596. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11926078_42
Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2013)
Del Vasto Terrientes, L., Moreno, A., Sánchez, D.: Discovery of relation axioms from the web. In: Bi, Y., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) KSEM 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6291, pp. 222–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15280-1_22
Tonon, A., Catasta, M., Demartini, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P.: Fixing the domain and range of properties in linked data by context disambiguation. In: LDOW@ WWW (2015)
Völker, J., Niepert, M.: Statistical schema induction. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 124–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21034-1_9
Zhang, Z., Gentile, A.L., Blomqvist, E., Augenstein, I., Ciravegna, F.: An unsupervised data-driven method to discover equivalent relations in large linked datasets. Semant. Web 8(2), 1–27 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Irny, R., Sreenivasa Kumar, P. (2017). Mining Inverse and Symmetric Axioms in Linked Data. In: Wang, Z., Turhan, AY., Wang, K., Zhang, X. (eds) Semantic Technology. JIST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10675. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70682-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70682-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70681-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70682-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)