Abstract
Empowering Command and Control (C2) systems with a harmonized view of information originating from different source providers (like physical sensors, messaging clients, legacy applications) is one of the key aspects of the C2-SENSE project: the effective management of emergencies is heavily dependent on information availability, its timeliness, its possibility to be correctly understood by specific consumers.
Achieving this goal in the highlighted context required to overcome some very specific and domain-oriented challenges, strongly influenced by the abundance of legacy architectures and applications found in the as-is, as well as their severely different technological level and maturity.
In this paper our intention is to show how, during the C2-Sense development, this service federation was made possible, which kind of issues had to be confronted with, which kind of solutions were evaluated and committed. In particular, we are going to delve into main aspects that can be improved, in order to suggest new investigation ways to make the project more declinable to real and complex crisis scenarios, giving a competitive advantage in being capable to reach an effective level of interoperability, making involved actors able to receive and understand information messages based on their actual informative value and not on the original capabilities of the convey systems.
In the conclusions we will also propose some further possible enhancements, built on top of the lesson learned during the C2-Sense research project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Quarantelli, E.L.: Problems in Disaster Preparedness and Response, Preliminary paper # 106, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1986a)
Quarantelli, E.L.: Disaster Crisis Management, Preliminary paper # 113, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1986b)
Quarantelli, E.L.: Criteria for Evaluating Disaster Planning in an Urban Setting, Preliminary paper # 132, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1988)
Quarantelli, E.L.: Major Criteria for Judging Disaster Planning and Managing Their Applicability in Developing Societies, Preliminary paper # 268, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1998)
Quarantelli, E.L., Tierney, K.: Disaster Preparation Planning, Preliminary paper # 59, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE (1979)
Zelm, M., et al.: Interoperability for crisis management (I-CriMa). In: Enterprise Interoperability: I-ESA 2012 Proceedings (2012)
Schulte, W.R., Natis, Y.V.: “Service Oriented” Architectures, Part 1, (report from Gartner) (1996)
Keen, M., Acharya, A.: Patterns: Implementing an SOA Using an Enterprise Service Bus. IBM Redbooks, New York (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fabbri, P., Russo, V., Sbarra, A.A. (2018). Improvements and Enhancements of Profile-Based Approach in C2-SENSE Crisis Management Project. In: Szewczyk, R., Havlik, D. (eds) Recent Trends in Control and Sensor Systems in Emergency Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 675. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70452-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70452-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70451-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70452-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)