Skip to main content

Student Reactions to and the Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Across Learning Domains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flipping the College Classroom

Abstract

This chapter identifies six learning domains that are critical to a well-rounded education and conducts a comprehensive review of the literature on outcomes associated with flipped learning for each learning domain. Based on this review, the chapter provides guidance regarding the learning goals, types of courses, and students most likely to benefit from flipped learning. In the science, technology, engineering, or math fields flipping results in higher examination scores than lecture-based courses. Limited research on flipped learning in the social sciences is positive, but more mixed, suggesting that the technique must be employed strategically to be beneficial. There is also emerging evidence that flipped learning may be more effective than lecture-based learning in promoting learning goals such as higher-order thinking, self-regulation, engagement, and academic and interpersonal skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These studies surveyed students in an actuarial program, a pharmaceutics course, a biology course, an economics course, an algebra course, a medical sciences course, and an accounting course.

References

  • Al-Zahrani, Abdulrahman M. 2015. From Passive to Active: The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Through Social Learning Platforms on Higher Education Students’ Creative Thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (6): 1133–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Laura, and Joseph P. Brennan. 2015. An Experiment in ‘Flipped’ Teaching in Freshman Calculus. PRIMUS 25 (9–10): 861–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Benajmin S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Davidd McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, Adam. 2014. Student Views on the Use of a Flipped Classroom Approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation 6: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, Unal, and Mucahit Ozturk. 2017. Flipped Classroom with Problem Based Activities: Exploring Self-Regulated Learning in a Programming Language Course. Educational Technology & Society 20 (1): 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Roy Y. 2016. Understanding the Purpose of Higher Education: An Analysis of the Economic and Social Benefits for Completing a College Degree. Journal of Education Policy, Planning and Administration 5 (5): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, Michael A. 2014. Inverted Teaching: Applying a New Pedagogy to a University Organic Chemistry Class. Journal of Chemical Education 91: 1845–1850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cilli-Turner, Emily. 2015. Measuring Learning Outcomes and Attitudes in a Flipped Introductory Statistics Course. PRIMUS 25 (9-10): 833–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, Wendy N. Whitman. 2016. Turning the Classroom Upside Down: Experimenting with the Flipped Classroom in American Government. Journal of Political Science Education 12 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danker, Brenda. 2015. Using Flipped Classroom Approach to Explore Deep Learning in a Large Classroom. The IAFOR Journal of Education 3 (1): 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, Jacob. 2013. Looking at the Impact of the Flipped Classrom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at SCUN. Tech Trends 57 (6): 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. Dee. 2013. Creating Significant Learning Experiences, Revised and Updated: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLN. 2015. Flipped Classroom Trends: A Survey of College Faculty. http://www.facultyfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/images/Flipped-Classroom-Trends_FF-Report-2015.pdf

  • Foertsch, Julie, Gregory Moses, John Strikwerda, and Mike Litzkow. 2002. Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-Based Streaming Video Software. Journal of Engineering Education 91 (3): 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foldnes, Njal. 2016. The Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment. Active Learning in Higher Education 17 (1): 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, Martin, Mitchell Low, and David Glance. 2013. Flipping the Sociology Classroom: Towards a Practice of Online Pedagogy. Journal of Sociology 49: 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, Cheryl, and Laura Gonzalez. 2014. Making Career Counseling Relevant: Enhancing Experiential Learning Using a ‘Flipped’ Course Design. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision 7 (2): article 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy, Mary Beth, Scott Heinerichs, and Gina Pazzaglia. 2015. Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom. Journal of Nutritional Education and Behavior 47: 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Gomez, David, Jin Su Jeong, Diego Airado Rodriquez, and Florentina Canada-Canada. 2016. Performance and Perception in the Flipped Learning Model: An Initial Approach to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Teaching Methodology in a General Science Classroom. Journal of Science and Educational Technology 25: 450–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Benjamin, Maddalena Marinari, Mike Hoffman, Kimberly DeSimone, and Peggy Burke. 2015. Flipped @SBU: Student Satisfaction and the College Classroom. Educational Research Quarterly 39 (2): 36–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, Shannon, Drew Baumgartel, and Maren Zobott. 2013. The Use of Screencasting to Transform Traditional Pedagogy in a Preservice Mathematics Content Course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 32 (2): 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, Shannon, Melissa Beal, Chris Lamb, Derek Sonderegger, and Drew Baumgartel. 2015. Flipping Undergraduate Finite Mathematics: Findings and Implications. PRIMUS 25: 9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdan, Noora, Patrick McKnight, Katherine McKnight, & Kari M. Arfstrom. 2013. A Review of Flipped Learning. Flipped Learnig Network. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf

  • Harvey, Sarah. 2014. The ‘Flipped’ Latin Classroom: A Case Study. Paedagogus 108 (1): 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, Megan R., Elizabeth M. Tracy, Lori L. Painter, Tina Oestreich, and Hyunyong Park. 2015. Moving from Flipcharts to the Flipped Classroom: Using Technology Driven Teaching Methods to Promote Active Learning in Foundation and Advanced Masters Social Work Courses. Clinical Social Work Journal 43: 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, Hsiu-Ting. 2015. Flipping the Classroom for English Language Learners to Foster Active Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 28 (1): 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Jamie L., Tyler A. Kummer, and Patricia D.d.m. Godoy. 2015. Improvements from a Flipped Classroom May Simply Be the Fruits of Active Learning. CBE-Life Science Education 14: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Nicole, and Theofanis Karafotias. 2016. Flipping the Classroom to Meet the Diverse Learning Needs of Library and Information Studies (LIS) Students. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 57 (3): 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Min Kyu, So Mi Kim, Otto Khera, and Joan Getman. 2014. The Experience of Three Flipped Classrooms in an Urban University: An Exploration of Design Principles. Internet and Higher Education 22: 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, David R., Benjamin S. Bloom, and Bertram B. Masia. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, Gokce. 2017. Implementing the Flipped Classroom in Teacher Education: Evidence from Turkey. Educational Technology & Society 20 (1): 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lage, Maureen J., Glen J. Platt, and Michael Treglia. 2000. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. The Journal of Economic Education 31: 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lape, Nancy, Rachel Levy, and Darryl Yong. 2014. Can Flipped Classrooms Help Students Learn? Slate, April 25. http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/04/flipped_classrooms_can_they_help_students_learn.html

  • Lavelle, Jerome P., Matthew Stimpson, and E. Downy Brill. 2013. Flipped Out Engineering Economy: Converting a Traditional Class to an Inverted Model. Proceedings of the 2013 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. Scott, and Marissa A. Harrison. 2012. Online Delivery as a Course Adjunct Promotes Active Learning and Student Success. Teaching of Psychology 39: 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, Betty, Angie Hodge, Neal Grandgenett, and Andrew W. Swift. 2014. Student Learning and Perceptions in a Flipped Linear Algebra Course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 45 (3): 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGivney-Burelle, Jean, and Fei Xue. 2013. Flipping Calculus. PRIMUS 23 (5): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Jacqueline E., LaToya M. Griffin, Denise A. Esserman, Christopher A. Davidson, Dylan M. Glatt, Mary T. Roth, Nastaran Gharkholonarehe, and Russell J. Mumper. 2013. Pharmacy Student Engagement, Performance, and Perception in a Flipped Satellite Classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77 (9): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Jaqueline, Mary T. Roth, Dylan M. Glatt, Nastaran Gharkholonarehe, Christopher A. Davidson, LaToya M. Griffin, Denise A. Esserman, and Russell J. Mumper. 2014. The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School. Academic Medicine 89: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Sarah, Stefanie M. Attardi, Lisa Faden, and Mark Goldszmidt. 2015. Flipped Classrooms and Student Learning: Not Just Surface Gains. Advances in Physiological Education 40: 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mennella, Thomas A. 2016. Comparing the Efficacy of Flipped vs. Alternative Active Learning in a College Genetics Course. The American Biology Teacher 78 (6): 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missildine, Kathy, Rebecca Fountain, Lynn Summers, and Kevin Gosselin. 2013. Flipping the Classroom to Improve Student Performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education 52 (10): 597–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, Heng Ngee. 2015. Teaching Tip: The Flipped Classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education 25 (1): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, Marin, Adrienne Williams, Nancy Aguilar-Roca, and Diane K. O’Dowd. 2010. Learn before Lecture: A Strategy that Improves Learning Outcomes in a Large Introductory Biology Class. CBE-Life Sciences Education 9: 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Daniel J. 2015. The Flipped Classroom Improves Student Achievement and Course Satisfaction in a Statistics Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Teaching of Psychology 43: 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Cynthia R., and Joseph E. Trainor. 2014. Millennial Students and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership 5: 102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Richard, and Jeremy Fox. 2012. Vocasts and Active-Learning Exercises in a “Flipped Classroom” Model of a Renal Pharmacotherapy Model. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 76 (10): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porcaro, Pauline A., Denise E. Jackson, Patricia M. McLaughlin, and Cindy J. O’Malley. 2016. Curriculum Design of a Flipped Classroom to Enhance Haematology Learning. Journal of Science Educational Technology 25: 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashar, Anupama. 2015. Assessing the Flipped Classroom in Operations Management: A Pilot Study. Journal of Education for Business 90: 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramlo, Susan. 2015. Student Views About a Flipped Physics Course: A Tool for Program Evaluation and Improvement. Research in the Schools 22 (1): 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, Travis. 2014. Student Perceptions Toward Flipped Learning: New Methods to Increase Interaction and Active Learning in Economics. International Review of Economics Education 17: 74–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, Jenay, Scott E. Lewis, Razanne Oueini, and Andrea Mapugay. 2016. Coordinated Implementation and Evaluation of Flipped Classes and Peer-Led Team Learning in General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 93: 1993–1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, V. Patricia, Lindsey M. Root Luna, Fallon J. Richie, and John J. Shaughnessy. 2017. The Benefits, Drawbacks, and Challenges of Using the Flipped Classroom in an Introduction to Psychology Course. Teaching of Psychology 44 (3): 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotellar, Cristina, and Jeff Cain. 2016. Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80 (2): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, Alpaslan, Baki Cavlazoglu, and Yunus E. Zeytuncu. 2015. Flipping a College Calculus Course: A Case Study. Educational Technology & Society 18 (3): 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Elizabeth. 1971. Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. In Behavioral Objectives in Curriculum Development, ed. Miriam B. Kapfer, 60–67. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, Jeremy F. 2012. How Learning in an Inverted Classroom Influences Cooperation, Innovation and Task Orientation. Learning Environment Research 15: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley, Cheryl P., and Stephen Scherer. 2013. The Enhanced Flipped Classroom: Increasing Academic Performance with Student-Recorded Lectures and Practice Testing in a “Flipped” STEM Course. The Journal of Negro Education 82: 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, Vincent. 2012. Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Touchton, Michael. 2015. Flipping the Classroom and Student Performance in Advanced Statistics: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment. Journal of Political Science Education 11: 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tune, Johnathan, Michael Sturek, and David P. Basile. 2013. Flipped Classroom Model Improves Graduate Student Performance in Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Renal Physiology. Advances in Physiology Education 37 (4): 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Sickle, Jenna. 2016. Discrepancies Between Student Perception and Achievement of Learning Outcomes in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 16 (2): 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, Erwin A., Jacobus C. Winnips, and Natasa Brouwer. 2015. Flipped-Class Pedagogy Enhances Student Metacognition and Collaborative-Learning Strategies in Higher Education but Effect Does Not Persist. CBE-Life Sciences Education 14 (1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, Randy D. 2015. Improved Performance via the Inverted Classroom. Chemical Engineering Education 49 (3): 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Stephanie G. 2013. The Flipped Class: A Method to Address the Challenges of an Undergraduate Statistics Course. Teaching of Psychology 40 (3): 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, Darryl, Rachel Levy, and Nancy Lape. 2015. Why No Difference? A Controlled Flipped Classroom Study for an Introductory Differential Equations Course. PRIMUS 25 (9–10): 907–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, Laurie, Jenny Fuselier, Adam Graham-Squire, Ron Lamb, and Karen O’Hara. 2015. Flipping Freshman Mathematics. PRIMUS 25: 9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, Xuesong, Jibao Gu, Hefu Liu, Jyh-Chong Liang, and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2017. An Experiential Learning Perspective on Students’ Satisfaction Model in a Flipped Classroom Context. Educational Technology & Society 20 (1): 198–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmeier, Lori B., and Chad M. Topaz. 2015. Flipped Calculus: A Study of Student Performance and Perceptions. PRIMUS 25 (9–10): 847–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roehling, P.V. (2018). Student Reactions to and the Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom Across Learning Domains. In: Flipping the College Classroom. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69391-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69392-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics