Skip to main content

Introduction to Flipped Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flipping the College Classroom

Abstract

This chapter introduces flipped learning, a student-centric pedagogy in which lecture is moved to the online environment and class time is spent engaging in active learning experiences. Following a discussion of the definition and history of flipped learning, the chapter presents eight principles to follow when designing a flipped experience and provides guidance on selecting topics or class periods to flip. The potential advantages and disadvantages of flipped learning are discussed, the primary advantage being the potential to teach a broad range of learning goals that cannot be taught as effectively in a lecture-based course. The remaining chapters examine the research on flipped learning and explain how to create flipped experiences that capitalize on their benefits and mitigate their disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Courses that do not include some form of digitized lecture will not be considered flipped learning.

  2. 2.

    Flipped learning can include occasional mini-lectures that clear up confusion or misunderstanding of the readings or digitized lecture.

  3. 3.

    While some researchers (e.g. Koo et al. 2016) label hybrid classes as flipped learning, a stricter definition of flipped learning is employed in this book.

References

  • Al-Zahrani, Abdulrahman M. 2015. From Passive to Active: The Impact of the Flipped Classroom Through Social Learning Platforms on Higher Education Students’ Creative Thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (6): 1133–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anaya, Guadalupe, and Darnell G. Cole. 2001. Latina/o Student Achievement: Exploring the Influence of Student-Faculty Interactions on College Grades. Journal of College Student Development 42 (2): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, Neil, Kari M. Arfstrom, and Kenneth Tam. 2013. Flipped Learning in Higher Education. Flipped Learning Network. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/HigherEdWhitePaper-FINAL.pdf

  • Astin, Alexander W. 1999. Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Development 40 (5): 518–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrett, Dan. 2012. How ‘Flipping’ the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture. Chronicle of Higher Education 19: 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Charles A., Kreag Danvers, and David T. Doran. 2016. Student Perceptions on Using Guided Reading Questions to Motivate Student Reading in the Flipped Classroom. Accounting Education 25 (3): 256–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Yunglung, Yuping Wang Kinshuk, and Nian-Shing Chen. 2014. Is FLIP Enough? Or Should We Use the FLIPPED Model Instead? Computers & Education 79: 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Darnell. 2007. Do Interracial Interactions Matter? An Examination of Student-Faculty Contact and Intellectual Self-Concept. The Journal of Higher Education 78 (3): 249–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edno, Jean J., and Richard L. Harpel. 1982. The Effect of Student-Faculty Interaction on Students Educational Outcomes. Research in Higher Education 16 (2): 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edutopia. 2011. Salman Khan on Liberating the Classroom for Creativity (Big Thinkers Series). September 30. https://www.edutopia.org/salman-khan-academy-flipped-classroom-video

  • Enfield, Jacob. 2013. Looking at the Impact of the Flipped Classrom Model of Instruction on Undergraduate Multimedia Students at SCUN. Tech Trends 57 (6): 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Michael. 2012, June 24. Classroom Lectures Go Digital. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/25/us/25ihteducside25.html

  • Flipped Learning Network (FLN). 2014. The Four Pilars of F-L-I-P. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FLIP_handout_FNL_Web.pdf

  • Fuster, Bradley. 2016. Negotiating the Many Definitions of Hybrid, Online Classes. U.S. News and World Report. http://www.usnews.com/education/online-learning-lessons/2016/01/15/negotiating-the-many-definitions-of-hybrid-online-classes

  • Guerrero, Shannon, Melissa Beal, Chris Lamb, Derek Sonderegger, and Drew Baumgartel. 2015. Flipping Undergraduate Finite Mathematics: Findings and Implications. PRIMUS 25: 9–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honeycutt, Barbi. 2013. Looking for ‘Flippable’ Moments in Your Class. Faculty Focus. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/blended-flipped-learning/looking-for-flippable-moments-in-your-class/

  • ———. 2016. 10 Strategies to Encourage Students to Actually Do the Pre-class Work in Flipped and Active Learning Classrooms. Flipped Learning Network. http://facultycenter.ischool.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/10-strategies-to-encourage-students-to-do-preclass-work.pdf

  • Kim, Min Kyu, So Mi Kim, Otto Khera, and Joan Getman. 2014. The Experience of Three Flipped Classrooms in an Urban University: An Exploration of Design Principles. Internet and Higher Education 22: 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Alison. 1993. From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side. College Teaching 41 (1): 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju, Meera, Sergey Musulkin, and Gargi Bhattacharya. 2010. Role of Student-Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement. Journal of College Student Development 51 (3): 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Cathy L., Elaine L. Demps, Charlotte Farris, John D. Bowman, Ladan Panahi, and Paul Boyle. 2016. Impact of Flipped Classroom Design on Student Performance and Perceptions in a Pharmacy Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 80 (2): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, George D., and Shouping Hu. 2001. The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. The Review of Higher Education 24 (3): 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Eric. 2009. Farewell, Lecture? Science 323: 50–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGivney-Burelle, Jean, and Fei Xue. 2013. Flipping Calculus. PRIMUS 23 (5): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Jacquelin E., LaToya M. Griffin, Denise A. Esserman, Christopher A. Davidson, Dylan M. Glatt, Mary T. Roth, Nastaran Gharkholonarehe, and Russell J. Mumper. 2013. Pharmacy Student Engagement, Performance, and Perception in a Flipped Satellite Classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77 (9): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Bannon, Blanche W., Jennifer Lubke, Jeffrey L. Beard, and Virginia G. Britt. 2011. Using Podcasts to Replace Lecture: Effects on Student Achievement. Computers & Education 57: 1885–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, Ernest T., and Patrick T. Terenzini. 1978. Student-Faculty Informal Relationships and Freshman Year Educational Outcomes. Journal of Educational Research 71 (4): 183–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, Ernest T., Patrick T. Terenzini, and James Hibel. 1978. Student-Faculty Interactional Settings and Their Relationship to Predicted Academic Performance. The Journal of Higher Education 49 (5): 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, Ernest T., Paul B. Duby, Patrick T. Terenzini, and Barbara K. Iverson. 1983. Student-Faculty Relationships and Freshman Year Intellectual and Personal Growth in a Nonresidential Setting. College Student Personnel 24 (5): 395–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, Patricia, Lindsey Root Luna, Fallon Richie, and John J. Shaughnessy. 2017. The Benefits, Drawbacks, and Challenges of Using the Flipped Classroom in an Introduction to Psychology Course. Teaching of Psychology 44 (3): 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Tina. 2013. “‘Flipped’ Classrooms, a Method for Mastery”, The Opinion Pages. New York Times, October 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, Alpaslan, Baki Cavlazoglu, and Yunus E. Zeytuncu. 2015. Flipping a College Calculus Course: A Case Study. Educational Technology & Society 18 (3): 142–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, Jeremy F. 2012. How Learning in an Inverted Classroom Influences Cooperation, Innovation and Task Orientation. Learning Environment Research 15: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, Patrick T., and Thomas M. Wright. 1987. Influences on Students’ Academic Growth During Four Years of College. Research in Higher Education 26 (2): 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbro, Jessica, Kari M. Arfstrom, Katherine McKnight, and Patrick McKnight. 2014. Extension of Review of Flipped Learning. Flipped Learning Network. http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Extension-of-FLipped-Learning-LIt-Review-June-2014.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roehling, P.V. (2018). Introduction to Flipped Learning. In: Flipping the College Classroom. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69392-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69391-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69392-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics