Abstract
In this section, the concept of the hipster is summarized as a paradox of self-design that is of little use for the cultural policing entailed by identity politics. In its prioritization of socio-political identification, art and culture can end up sealing such identities, the effects of which are seen in the rise of left-wing censorship and the broad perception of a causal relationship between ethical intention and community consensus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bruno Latour and Jacques Rancière, “Regards de philosophes,” Beaux-Arts Magazine, ed. Jean-Max Colard and Nicolas Demorand, Issue 396 (2002), 111.
- 2.
Ibid.
- 3.
Jacques Rancière, “A few remarks on the method of Jacques Rancière,” Parallax, 15 (2009): 116.
- 4.
Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. J. Rose (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), 32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hill, W. (2017). Conclusion. In: Art after the Hipster. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68578-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68578-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68577-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68578-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)