Skip to main content

The Twenty-First-Century Hipster

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Art after the Hipster
  • 453 Accesses

Abstract

In this section, hipsterism is examined in relation to concepts such as “normcore” and “post-critical,” as well as the theories of Slavoj Žižek and Jacques Rancière, portraying a contemporary image of the hipster as dominated by an identity politics that paradoxically depoliticizes its subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kurutz, 2013: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/opinion/sunday/caught-in-the-hipster-trap.html?_r=0; October 1, 2014.

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Mark Greif, What Was the Hipster? A Sociological Investigation (n +1 Foundation, 2010), vii.

  4. 4.

    Michele Persad, “The 13 Most Hipster Items of Clothing,” Huffington Post, July 16, 2014 http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/hipster-clothing_n_5589392.html?section=australia; Feb. 2, 2016.

  5. 5.

    Dayna Tortorici, What Was the Hipster? A Sociological Investigation (n +1 Foundation, 2010), 124–5.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Patrice Evans, What was the Hipster: A Sociological Investigation ((n +1) Foundation, 2010), 106–107.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    Mark Greif, “The Hipster in the Mirror,” New York Times (November 12, 2010). http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/books/review/Greif-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed 21 Sept. 2014).

  10. 10.

    Sophy Bot, The Hipster Effect (New York: Sophy Bot, 2012).

  11. 11.

    Joe Bish, “What will Replace the Hipster?” Vice (Dec. 18, 2015) http://www.vice.com/read/hw-what-will-replace-the-hipster-245 (accessed Dec. 20, 2015).

  12. 12.

    Dan Ozzie, “Please, God, Let 2014 Be the Year We Retire the Word ‘Hipster’,” Noisey January 3, 2014 http://noisey.vice.com/blog/please-god-let-2014-be-the-year-we-retire-the-word-hipster (accessed Dec. 5, 2016).

  13. 13.

    Homi K. Bhabha, “Double Visions,” Artforum (January 1992): 88.

  14. 14.

    Anna Louie Sussman, “Can Only Rich Kids Afford to Work in the Art World?” Artsy (Feb. 14, 2017) https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-rich-kids-afford-work-art-world (accessed 14 February 2017).

    Stephen Pritchard, “Hipsters and artists are the gentrifying foot soldiers of capitalism”, Guardian (13 September, 2016). https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/13/hipsters-artists-gentrifying-capitalism (accessed 29/10/2016).

  15. 15.

    Emily Nussbaum, “It’s Different for ‘Girls,’” New York Magazine 25 Mar. 2012. http://nymag.com/arts/tv/features/girls-lena-dunham-2012-4/index1.html (accessed 1/5/17).

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Hal Foster, “Arty Party,” London Review of Books (December 4, 2003): 22.

  18. 18.

    Andreas Huyssen, “Introduction: Modernism after Postmodernity,” New German Critique 99, Vol. 33, No. 3 (Fall 2006): 1.

  19. 19.

    Joseph Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (London: Routledge, 1994 [1942]), 82.

  20. 20.

    Fredric Jameson, “Postmodernism: Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,” New Left Review 146 (1984): 85–87.

  21. 21.

    Johanna Burton, “Questionnaire on ‘The Contemporary,’” October 130 (Fall 2009): 24.

  22. 22.

    Terry Smith, ‘Questionnaire on the Contemporary’, October 130 (Fall 2009): 47.

  23. 23.

    bell hooks, “Postmodern Blackness,” Postmodern Culture 1.1 (1990): 12.

  24. 24.

    Terry Smith, ‘Contemporary Art and Contemporaneity’, Critical Inquiry (Summer 2006): 703.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 704.

  26. 26.

    Smith , “Questionnaire on the Contemporary,” 47.

  27. 27.

    Isabelle Graw, High Price: Art Between the Market and Celebrity Culture (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2009), 130.

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 131.

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner Pluhar (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1987), 153.

  33. 33.

    Jean Baudrillard, “The System of Objects,” Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988 [1968]), 17.

  34. 34.

    Kant, Critique of Judgment, 232.

  35. 35.

    Gregg Bordowitz, “Cultural Appropriation: A Roundtable,” Artforum (Summer, 2017).

  36. 36.

    A. Farrell. ‘Meet Norma Normcore’. Vogue online, 21 March 2014. Available: http://www.vogue.co.uk/news/2014/03/21/normcore-fashion-vogue---definition [accessed 21/04/15].

  37. 37.

    Baldessare Castiglione, The Book of the Courtier, trans. Charles S. Singleton, ed. Daniel Javitch (New York: Norton, 2002), 32.

  38. 38.

    K-Hole, ‘Youth Mode: A Report on Freedom,’ K-Hole, October, 2013.

  39. 39.

    Benedict Seymour, “Notes on Normcore,” Mute, May 29, 2014 http://www.metamute.org/editorial/fifth-column/notes-normcore

  40. 40.

    Rory Rowan, “So Now!:On Normcore,” e-flux Journal no. 58 (2014) http://www.e-flux.com/journal/58/61168/so-now-on-normcore/ [accessed 11/04/15].

  41. 41.

    Bruno Latour, “An Attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’,” New Literary History 41 (2010): 475.

  42. 42.

    Bruno Latour, “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30, No. 2 (2004): 236.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 225.

  44. 44.

    Bruno Latour, “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimension of Science Studies,” Body & Society Vol. 10 (2004): 205.

  45. 45.

    Rosi Braidotti, “Borrowed Energy,” Frieze issue 164 (2014), 86.

  46. 46.

    Bruno Latour, “Coming Out as a Philosopher,” Social Studies of Science 40.4 (2010): 600.

  47. 47.

    Hal Foster, Bad New Days (London: Verso, 2015), 121.

  48. 48.

    Nav Haq, “Art After Identity Politics: Nav Haq in conversation with Stephanie Bailey,” Ibraaz.org / 17 December 2014 http://www.ibraaz.org/interviews/150 [accessed 21/04/15].

  49. 49.

    Hito Steyerl, “The Institution of Critique,” Art and Contemporary Critical Practice: Reinventing Institutional Critique, ed. Gerald Raunig and Gene Ray (London: Mayfly Books, 2009), 17.

  50. 50.

    Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Clement Greenberg, “Avant-Garde and Kitsch,” in Art and Culture (Boston: Beacon Press, 1961), 8.

  52. 52.

    Sven Lütticken, “Art as a Second-Degree Medium,” OZG, 15 (2004):112–3.

  53. 53.

    Ibid.

  54. 54.

    Ibid.

  55. 55.

    Ibid.

  56. 56.

    Slavoj Žižek, “L’etat d’hipster,” Rhinocerotique, trans. Henry Brulard (September, 2009): 3.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 6.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., 7.

  59. 59.

    Ibid., 9.

  60. 60.

    Sigmund Freud, Civilization and its Discontents (New York: WW Norton and Co., 1962), 61.

  61. 61.

    Jacques Rancière, Dissensus: on Politics and Aesthetics, trans. And ed. Steven Corcoran (New York: Continuum, 2010), 217.

  62. 62.

    Ibid., 18.

  63. 63.

    Ibid., 18.

  64. 64.

    Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. Julie Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1999 [1995]), 123.

  65. 65.

    Rancière , Dissensus: on Politics and Aesthetics, 144.

  66. 66.

    Rancière, Disagreement, 138.

  67. 67.

    Jacques Rancière, “Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization,” October, vol. 61 (Summer, 1992): 60.

  68. 68.

    Ibid.

  69. 69.

    Ibid., 59.

  70. 70.

    Jacques Rancière, “The Thinking of Dissensus: Politics and Aesthetics,” Reading Rancière , ed. Paul Bowman, Richard Stamp (New York: Continuum, 2011), 13.

  71. 71.

    Ibid., 13.

  72. 72.

    Slavoj Žižek, The Parallax View (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006), 41.

  73. 73.

    Toni Ross, “Material Thinking: the aesthetic philosophy of Jacques Rancière and the design art of Andrea Zittel,” Studies in Material Thinking, vol. 1, No. 2 (April 2008). http://www.materialthinking.org (accessed 1/9/12).

  74. 74.

    Jacques Rancière, “The Sublime from Lyotard to Schiller: Two readings of Kant and their political significance,” Radical Philosophy, 126 (2004): 9.

  75. 75.

    Ibid., 12.

  76. 76.

    Rancière , The Politics of Aesthetics, 44.

  77. 77.

    Jacques Rancière, “The Aesthetic Revolution and its Outcomes: Emplotments of Autonomy and Heteronomy,” New Left Review 14 (2002): 135.

  78. 78.

    Rancière , The Politics of Aesthetics, 5.

  79. 79.

    Nikos Papastergiadis, “A Breathing Space for Aesthetics and Politics: An Introduction to Jacques Rancière,” Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 31(7/8) 5–26 (2014).

  80. 80.

    Rancière , The Politics of Aesthetics, 63.

  81. 81.

    Jacques Rancière, “Who is the Subject of the Rights of Man?,” The South Atlantic Quarterly 103.2 (2004): 303.

  82. 82.

    Rancière , The Politics of Aesthetics, 63.

  83. 83.

    Rancière , Dissensus, 136.

  84. 84.

    Rancière , The Politics of Aesthetics, 42.

  85. 85.

    Rancière , Dissensus, 136.

  86. 86.

    Rancière , Dissensus, 74.

  87. 87.

    Jean-Philippe Deranty, Danielle Petherbridge and John Rundell, “Themes and Dialogues in Contemporary French Critical Theory,” Recognition, Work, Politics (Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 2007), 4.

  88. 88.

    Ibid., 184.

  89. 89.

    Michael Rectenwald, “What’s Wrong With Identity Politics (and Intersectionality Theory)? A Response to Mark Fisher’s “Exiting the Vampire Castle” (And Its Critics),” The North Star (December 2, 2013) http://www.thenorthstar.info/?p=11411 (accessed 7/7/2015).

  90. 90.

    Richard Rorty, “Is ‘Cultural Recognition’ a Useful Concept for Leftist Politics?” Critical Horizons 1:1 (February 2000), 7.

  91. 91.

    Richard Rorty, Achieving our Country, 27.

  92. 92.

    Jodi Dean, “Not Us, Me,” Verso Books (November 26, 2016). http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2970-not-us-me (accessed 2/3/2017).

  93. 93.

    Ibid.

  94. 94.

    Jean and John Comaroff, Ethnicity, Inc. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

  95. 95.

    Dean, “Not Us, Me.”

  96. 96.

    Monica Tan, “China Has Hipsters, too,” The Atlantic, Nov. 2012. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/11/china-has-hipsters-too/264414/ (accessed 12 Nov. 2015).

  97. 97.

    Shan Huang, “Independence at Large: Contemporary China’s Alternative Music Scenes and the Cultural Practices of Post-Socialist Urban Youth,” Master’s thesis, University of South Carolina, 2014, 1.

  98. 98.

    Ibid., 42.

  99. 99.

    Ibid., 47–55.

  100. 100.

    Tan , “China Has Hipsters, too.”

  101. 101.

    Credit Suisse, Global Wealth Report 2015 (2016). https://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/?fileID=F2425415-DCA7-80B8-EAD989AF9341D47E (accessed 1 Nov. 2016).

  102. 102.

    Ibid.

  103. 103.

    Ibid.

  104. 104.

    World Bank Group, “Global Monitoring Report 2014/2015: Ending Poverty and Sharing Prosperity,” (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2015). http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/gmr/gmr2014/GMR_2014_Full_Report.pdf

  105. 105.

    Ico Maly and Piia Varis, “The 21st-century hipster: On micro-populations in times of superdiversity,” European Journal of Cultural Studies (2015) 14.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, W. (2017). The Twenty-First-Century Hipster. In: Art after the Hipster. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68578-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics