Skip to main content

Gemini fully operational

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gemini Flies!

Part of the book series: Springer Praxis Books ((SPACEE))

  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

“It was a truly excellent

engineering test flight of the vehicle.”

John Young, Forever Young (2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This problem of communication with a spacecraft through the plasma layer as it enters the atmosphere was not addressed until the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) network was deployed by the Space Shuttle in the 1980s and 1990s. The shape of the orbiter helped to establish communications during entry. As the majority of heat was on the underside (belly) of the orbiter, with its thermo-protective tiles facing down and bearing the brunt of the ionizing plasma layer, that layer was ‘open’ at its trailing end behind the Shuttle, above the crew compartment, the closed payload bay and the upper wing surfaces. It was found that the signals could be sent directly through the ‘gap’ to TDRSS and then down to the ground and vice versa, without the need to penetrate the plasma layer. Even if TDRSS had been available for Mercury, Gemini or Apollo, however, their smaller, blunt-body cone shape would not have been sufficient to create a gap in the plasma as the Shuttle orbiter did.

  2. 2.

    The naming issue would become a problem again from Apollo 9 in March 1969, the first mission to involve two spacecraft flown separately, because the CSM and the LM required two different radio callsigns to identify them. Therefore, from that flight to the Apollo 17 mission, each Apollo CSM and LM was given its own, occasionally frivolous, callsign. This practice ceased again for Skylab and ASTP, only to be revived once more by the individual naming of each Shuttle orbiter.

References

  1. MSC Round Up, April 2, 1965, Volume 4, No. 12, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Failure is Not an Option, Gene Kranz, Simon & Schuster, 2000, pp. 130-131.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Astronautics and Aeronautics 1965, NASA SP-4006, 1966, pp. 150-151.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manned Space Flight Experiments Symposium, Gemini Missions III and IV, held at the Auditorium of the Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C. October 18-19, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Synergistic Effect of Zero G and Radiation on White Blood Cells, an Experiment for the Gemini III Manned Space Flight, in the Annual Report Period Ending June 30, 1965 prepared by M. A. Bender, Biology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, August 1966. ORNL-TM-1550; also, The Gemini 3 S-4 Spaceflight-Radiation Interaction Experiment, by M.A. Bender, P.C. Gooch and S. Kondo, in Radiation Research Volume 31 Number 1. May 1967 pp. 91-111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evaluation and Test Report of Changing from Single-Point Suspension to Two-Point Suspension, Gemini Program Mission Report, Gemini 3 Supplementary Report 9, prepared by McDonnell Aircraft Corporation, St. Louis, Missouri for the GT-3 Mission Evaluation Team, NASA MSC Houston, Texas, MSC-G-R-65-2 June 1965. From the McDonnell Final Report 0523-055.18 dated June 30, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NASA JSC Oral History Project, Alan M. Rochford, September 15, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  8. On the Shoulders of Titans, A History of Project Gemini , Barton C. Hacker and James M. Grimwood, NASA SP-4203, 1977, p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deke! Donald K. Slayton with Michael Cassutt, Forge Books, 1994, p. 149

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moonshot: The Inside Story of America’s Apollo Moon Landings, Alan Shepard and Deke Slayton, with Jay Barbree, Turner Publishing Company, 1994, pp. 179-180.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schirra’s Space, Walter M. ‘Wally’ Schirra, with Richard N. Billings, U.S. Naval Institute Press, 1988, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forever Young: A Life of Adventure in Air and Space, John Young with James R. Hansen, University Press of Florida, 2012, pp. 84-85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1966, p. 338.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coming Home, Re-entry and Recovery for Space, Roger D. Launius and Dennis R. Jenkins, NASA Aeronautics Book Series, 2012, pp. 62-69; e-book https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/coming_home_detail.html.

  15. Gemini 3, A Field Guide to American Spacecraft, Jim Gerard, www.amerianspacecraft.com last accessed January 5, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shayler, D.J. (2018). Gemini fully operational. In: Gemini Flies!. Springer Praxis Books(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68142-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics