Skip to main content

History and Current State of Forensic Imaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
P5 Medicine and Justice
  • 653 Accesses

Abstract

When Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen discovered X-rays on the 8th of November, 1895, not only Clinical Diagnostic Radiology but also Forensic Radiology came into being. Röntgen himself created the first radiographs, which showed the potential of the new rays concerning forensics. In 1896, Röntgen’s discovery induced fantasies—in 2016, some of these fantasies have materialised in forensics. Since 1896, X-rays have been utilised by forensic pathologists. As parts of new techniques and methods, X-rays help to answer old questions. In this chapter Milestones, Tools, and Techniques of post mortem and ante mortem forensic imaging are presented and discussed. The future will show whether and where Virtopsy shall be used in addition to forensic pathology—or instead of autopsy—and how far the applications of imaging methods without ionising radiation will increase the utilization and the diagnostic power in the clinical forensic medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brogdon BG, Lichtenstein JE (2011) Forensic radiology in historical perspective. In: Thali JM, Viner MD, Brogdon BG (eds) Brogdon’s forensic radiology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–24

    Google Scholar 

  2. Glasser O (1931) Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen und die Geschichte der Röntgenstrahlen. In: Berg HH, Frik K (eds) Röntgenkunde in Einzeldarstellungen, vol 3. Springer, Berlin p 4, 11, 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rübe W (1957) Zur Geschichte der medizinischen Strahlenkunde. Röntgenpraxis 4:48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Röntgen WC (ed) (1895) Über eine neue Art von Strahlen (Vorläufige Mitteilung). Sitzungsbericht Physik. Med. Ges. Würzburg. Springer, Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hedfeld A (1948) Wiederkehr des Jahrestages der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen. Röntgenphotographie 1:3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel H (ed) (2008) Violence, war, borders. X-rays: evidence and threat. Shaker Verlag, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vogel H, Brogdon BG (2003) Search of cargo and transport. In: Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD (eds) A radiologic atlas of abuse, torture, terrorism, and inflicted trauma. mCRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 309–316

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vogel B, Vogel H (eds) (2014) Forensics, radiology, society. X-rays: tool and document. Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brecher R, Brecher E (eds) (1969) The rays: the history of radiology in the United States and Canada. William and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brecher R, Brecher E (1969) The rays: the history of radiology in the United States and Canada. Baltimore, William and Wilkins, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brecher R, Brecher E (1969) The rays: the history of radiology in the United States and Canada. Baltimore, William and Wilkins, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halperin EC (1988) X-rays at the bar, 1896–1930. Invest Radiol 23:639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cox J, Kirckpatrick RC (1896) The new photography with report of a case, in which a bullet was photographed in the leg. Montreal Med J 24:661–665

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collins VP (1964) Origins of medico-legal and forensic reontgenology. In: Bruwer AJ (ed) Classic descriptions in diagnostic radiology, vol 2. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, p 1578

    Google Scholar 

  15. Glasser O (1931) First roentgen evidence. Radiology 17:789–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans KT, Knight B, Whittaker DK (1981) Forensic radiology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eckert WG, Garland N (1984) The history of the forensic applications in radiology. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5(1):53–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hille H (1949) Erinnerungen eines Studenten an Röntgens Laboratorium vor fünfzig Jahren. Röntgenphotographie 2:144

    Google Scholar 

  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarence_Madison_Dally. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  20. Dewing SB (1964) Modern radiology in historical perspective. Charles P Thomas, Springfield, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ford MA, Ashley KF (1973) The role of the forensic dentist in aircraft accidents. In: Manson JK, Reals WJ (eds) Aerospace pathology. College of American Pathologists Foundation, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sognnaes RF (1977) Dental evidence in the post mortem identification of Adolf Hitler, Eva Braun, and Martin Bormann. Leg Med Annu 1976:173–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lifton RJ (1966) The Nazi doctors: medical killings and the psychology of genocide. Basic Books, New York, pp 337–383

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas AM (2014) Radiology and forensic pathology: the case of Dr. Buck Ruxton. In: Vogel B, Vogel H (eds) Forensics, radiology, society. X-rays: tool and document. Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, pp 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  25. Béclère H (1920) La radiographie anthropométrique du pouce (superimposition des empreintes digitales, du squelette et de l’ongle). Compt rend Acad 167:499–500

    Google Scholar 

  26. Béclère H (1918) La radiographie cutanée. J Radiol Electrol 4:145

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clark Panel Report (1969) 1968 Panel review of photographics, X-ray films, documents and other evidence pertining to the fatal wounding of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dallas. Texas. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. Warren Commission Report (1964) U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Breo DL (1992) JFK’s death—the plain truth from the MDs who did the autopsy. JAMA 267(20):2794–2803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Artwohl RR (1993) JFK’s assassination. Conspiracy, forensic science, and common sense. JAMA 269(12):1540–1543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tutankhamun. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  32. Hughes S (2011) CT scanning in archology. In: Saba L (ed) Computed Tomography. INTECH, Rijeka, p 57–68. https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=%C3%96tzi+Computed+Tomography&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWnIC0jL7MAhXI2ywKHUPwA-EQgQMIIjAA. Accessed 3 May 2016

  33. Brown TC, Robinson WL (1952) Medical identification in the Noronic disaster. J Am Med Assoc 148(8):621–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Viner MD, Lichtenstein JE (2003) Radiology in mass casualty situations. In: Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD (eds) A radiologic atlas of abuse, torture, terrorism, and inflicted trauma. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 177–185

    Google Scholar 

  35. Matthaes G (1997) Illustirertes Handbuch des Kunstsammlers. Zur Echtheitserkennung von Antiquitäten. Garanzanti Verga, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  36. Grabherr S, Grimm J (2014) Mulitphase post-mortem CT-angiography (MPMCTA): a new method for investigationg violenct death. In: Vogel B, Vogel H (eds) Forensics, radiology, society. X-rays: tool and document. Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg, pp 156–163

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thali MJ, Vock P, Dirnhofer R (2003) Virtual autopsy with radiological cross-sectional modalities: mulislice-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In: Brogdon BG, Vogel H, McDowell JD (eds) A radiologic atlas of abuse, torture, terrorism, and inflicted trauma. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  38. Viner MD, Lichtenstein JE (2010) Radiology in mass casualty situations. In: Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG (eds) Brogdon’s forensic radiology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 177–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Levy AD, Harcke HT (2010) New approaches to radiology in mass casualty situations. In: Thali MJ, Viner MD, Brogdon BG (eds) Brogdon’s forensic radiology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 199–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel H (2013) Torture. In: Siegel JA, Sauko PJ (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Elsevier, London-Waltham-San Diego, pp 123–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Vogel H (2013) Postmortem imaging. In: Siegel JA, Sauko PJ (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic sciences. Elsevier, London-Waltham-San Diego, pp 243–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Özkalipci Ö, Sahin Ü, Baykal T, Fincanci SK, Akhan O, Öztop F, Lök V (2007) Iskence atlasi. Türkiye Insan Haklari Vakfi

    Google Scholar 

Credits

  1. From Vogel H (2008): Violence, war, borders. X-rays: evidence and threat Shaker 2008, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vogel B, Vogel H (2014): Forensics, radiology, society. X-rays: tool and document, Kovac, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nushida H, Vogel H, Püschel K, Heinemann A (2011): Der durchsichtige Tote—Post mortem CT und forensische Radiologie, Kovac, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermann Vogel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vogel, H. (2017). History and Current State of Forensic Imaging. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics