Skip to main content

Abstract

There is a common view in the stress literature that there exists a curvilinear relationship between positive stress (eustress) and negative stress (distress). This model does not imply that eustress is at one end of the scale and distress at the other, but rather the model has a bell-shaped curve. At one end of the curve, less challenging tasks with low work demands cause distress. The top of the curve is where moderate work demands of moderately challenging tasks cause maximal eustress. At the other end of the curve, distress is characterized by tasks that are too challenging and work demands too high. This model, called the Yerkes–Dodson law, is one of the oldest in the history of psychology, dating back to 1908.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. USA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. S. (2004). Chaos theory and leadership studies: Exploring uncharted seas. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. L., & Payne, R. (1992). International perspectives on research into work, well-being, and stress management. In J. C. Quick, L. R. Murphy, & J. J. Hurrell (Eds.), Stress and well-being at work (ss (pp. 348–368). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, T. H., Saksvik, P. Ø., Nytro, K., Torvatn, H., & Bayazit, M. (2004). Expanding the psychosocial work environment: Workplace norms and work-family conflict as correlates of stress and health. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 83–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, P., & Møller, N. (2007). From conflict to shared development: Social capital in a Tayloristic environment. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 3, 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansisalmi, H., Peiro, J. M., & Kivimaki, M., IV. (2000). Collective stress and coping in the context of organizational culture. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 527–559. doi:10.1080/13594320050203120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D., & Cooper, C. (2005). Stress and health: A positive direction. Stress and Health, 21, 73–75. doi:10.1002/smi.1053

  • Nelson, D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (2003). Health psychology and work stress: A more positive approach. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (ss. 97–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nytrø, K., Saksvik, P. Ø., Mikkelsen, A., Bohle, P., & Quinlan, M. (2000). An appraisal of key factors in the implementation of occupational stress interventions. Work & Stress, 13, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, T., Kouvonen, A., Kivimäki, M., & Pentti, J. (2008). Social capital at work as a predictor of employee health: multilevel evidence from work units in Finland. Social Science and Medicine, 3, 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saksvik, I. B., Saksvik, P. Ø., & Nordvik, H. (2004). Personlighetens rolle for hvordan stress oppleves i arbeidslivet. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 41, 612–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saksvik, P. Ø., & Tvedt, S. D. (2009). Leading change in a healthy way. Scandinavian journal of Organizational Psychology, 1, 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saksvik, P. Ø., Tvedt, S. D., Nytrø, K., Buvik, M. P., Andersen, G. R., Andersen, T. K., et al. (2007). Developing criteria for healthy organizational change. Work & Stress., 21, 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tvedt, S. D., Saksvik, P. Ø., & Nytrø, K. (2009). Healthy organizational change processes as a prerequisite for a good psychological work environment. Work & Stress, 23, 80–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Øystein Saksvik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saksvik, P.Ø. (2017). Constructive Stress. In: Christensen, M., Saksvik, P., Karanika-Murray, M. (eds) The Positive Side of Occupational Health Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66781-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics