Skip to main content

Artistic Diplomacy: On Civic Engagement and Transnational Theatre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Performance and Civic Engagement
  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

Contemporary European theatre builds on many traditions, yet two seem particularly at odds: wandering theatre troupes and publicly funded municipal theatre institutions. While the Italian commedia dell’arte, the French théâtre de la foire or the German Wandertruppen frequently appear as marginalised, itinerant phenomena in theatre histories, the public city, state or national theatres of these three countries embody aristocratic patronage, bourgeois audiences and artistic continuity. This contrast has not always and everywhere been as crass, however. While nineteenth-century Germany did indeed see the gradual erosion of wandering troupes, a few well-known European theatre artists of the twentieth century have kept up a tradition that brings together civic engagement, public patronage and transnational theatre. This chapter introduces a committed cosmopolitan theatre maker, a self-styled ‘bastard-child’ of different critical, nomadic, European traditions and his theatre’s international practice: Roberto Ciulli and the Theater an der Ruhr in the German post-industrial Ruhr valley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. London/Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. 1980. ‘On the impact of revenue subsidies on repertory theatre policy.’ Journal of Cultural Economics. 4: 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, Eugenio. 1987. ‘The etymological intellectual’. New Theatre Quarterly. 3 (10): 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba, Eugenio and Richard Fowler. 1982. ‘Theatre Anthropology’. The Drama Review: TDR. 26 (2): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartula, Malgorszata and Stefan Schroer. 2001. Über Improvisation. Neun Gespräche mit Roberto Ciulli. Duisburg: trikont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanes, Ruy, Alex Flynn, Maïté Maskens, and Jonas Tinius. 2016. Eds. ‘Micro-utopias: anthropological perspectives on art, relationality, and creativity’. Special Issue. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia/Journal of Art and Anthropology (5)1. https://cadernosaa.revues.org/999.

  • Bohannan, Laura. 1966. ‘Shakespeare in the Bush’. Natural History 75: 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojadžijev, Manuela and Regina Römhild. 2014. ‘Was kommt nach dem “transnational turn”? Perspektiven für eine kritische Migrationsforschung’. Berliner Blätter. Ethnographische und Ethnologische Beiträge 65: 10–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Dominic. 2013. ‘Simply the Best: Parody and Political Sincerity’. American Ethnologist 40 (2): 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2007 [2000]. Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulli, Roberto. 2013. ‘Staatspreis NRW für Roberto Ciulli. “Ich blicke auf die Welt wie ein Clown”. Interview with Dorothee Krings. Rheinische Post. 20. November 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulli, Roberto and Helmut Schäfer. N.d. ‘Das Modell’. Subsection ‘Konzeption’. Website of the Theater an der Ruhr. Mülheim. http://theater-ander-ruhr.de/konzeption/modell/, last accessed on 11 October 2017.

  • ———. N.d. ‘Grundsatz International’. Subsection ‘Konzeption’. Website of the Theater an der Ruhr. Mülheim. http://www.theater-an-derruhr.de/konzeption/international/grundsatz/, last accessed on 11 October 2017.

  • Crehan, K. 2011. Community Art. An Anthropological Perspective. London/New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, U. 1999. Hoftheater. Zur Geschichte des Theaters und der Höfe im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deck, J. and A. Sieburg. Eds. 2011. Politisch Theater Machen. Neue Artikulationsformen des Politischen in den darstellenden Künsten. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bühnenverein. 1999. Theaterstatistik 1998/99. Cologne: Deutscher Bühnenverein.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Theaterstatistik 2013/2014. Cologne: Deutscher Bühnenverein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Nicholas and Jonathan Mair. 2015. ‘Ethics across Borders. Incommensurability and Affinity’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 201–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, E., T. Jost and S. I. Jain 2014. eds. The Politics of Interweaving Performance Cultures. Beyond Postcolonialism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Alex and Jonas Tinius. ‘Reflecting on political performance: Introducing critical perspectives’ (Introduction), in: Anthropology, Theatre, and Performance: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grütters, Monika. 2014a. “Wir müssen unsere Kulturlandschaft schützen!” Interview conducted by Nina May. Leipziger Volkszeitung. 28 July 2014. http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Interview/2014/07/2014-07-29-gruetters-lvz.html?nn=442658, last accessed on 10 October 2017.

  • ———. 2014b. ‘Rede von Kulturstaatsministerin Monika Grütters im Rahmen der Mitgliederversammlung des Deutschen Kulturrates’. 25 September 2014. Staatsministerin für Kultur und Medien. http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Rede/2014/09/2014-09-25-gruettersdkr.html?nn=402618, last accessed on 10 October 2017.

  • Hänzi, Denis. 2013. Die Ordnung des Theaters. Eine Soziologie der Regie. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemke, Rolf C. 2008. ‘Rolf C. Hemke, Netzwerker’. Interview conducted by Margitta Ulbricht. Westfalenpost. 7 December 2008. https://www.waz.de/staedte/muelheim/rolf-c-hemke-netzwerker-id933212.html, last accessed on 10 October 2017.

  • ———. Ed. 2010 Theatre in Sub-Saharan Africa. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Ed. 2013. Theatre in the Arab World. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.. Ed. 2013. Theatre in the Arab World. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallmorgen, W. 1955. Was heisst und zu welchem Ende baut man Kommunaltheater. Darmstadt: Verlag Das Beispiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Armin. 2008 [2003]. Besucherbindung im Kulturbetrieb. Ein Handbuch. 2te Auflage. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Magnus/Ibañez-Tirado, Diana/Henig, David. 2016. ‘Everyday Diplomacy. Introduction to Special Issue’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology. 34(2): 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, P. W. 2003. Theater und kulturelle Erinnerung. Kultursemiotische Untersuchungen zu George Tabori, Tadeusz Kantor und Rina Yerushalmi. Basel/Tübingen: A. Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montias, J. M. (1983) ‘Public support for the performing arts in Europe and the United States’, in: Comparative Development Perspectives. G. Ranis and R. L. West. Eds. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press; reprinted in: P. DiMaggio. 1986. Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts. Studies in Mission and Constraint. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 287–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neligan, Adriana. 2006. ‘Public funding and repertoire conventionality in the German public theatre sector: an econometric analysis’. Applied Economics. 38: 1111-1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, John. 1998. The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and in the United States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, John and Adriana Neligan. 2005. ‘State Subsidies and Repertoire Conventionality in the Non-Profit English Theatre Sector: An Econometric Analysis’. Journal of Cultural Economics. 29: 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Dictionary of English. 2015. 3rd Edn. Ed. Angus Stevenson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, Rupert. 2012. ‘Darum reisen wir!’. Blog entry. Warum reisen wir? Das Onlinetagebuch des Theater an der Ruhr. 26 November 2012. http://www.theater-an-der-ruhr-blog.org/2012/11/26/darum-reisen-wir/, last accessed 10 October 2017.

  • Taylor, Diana. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire. Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. C. 1994. ‘The production and consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics.’ Journal of Economic Literature. 32: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinius, Jonas. 2015a. ‘Bilder, Reisen und Theaterlandschaften. Roberto Ciullis Theater an der Ruhr.’ Das Deutsche Theater im 20. Jahrhundert. Kleine Schriften der Gesellschaft für Theatergeschichte. Heft 43. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Theatergeschichte, pp. 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. ‘Activism and Autonomy, Political Aesthetics and Aesthetic Politics’, in: Anthropology, Theatre, and Development. The Transformative Potential of Theatre. Flynn, Alex and Jonas Tinius. Eds. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015c. ‘Ethical self-cultivation as the politics of engaged theatre. How theatre engages refugee politics’, in: Anthropology, Theatre, and Development. The Transformative Potential of Theatre. Flynn, Alex and Jonas Tinius. Eds. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015d. ‘Institutional formations and artistic critique in German ensemble theatre’. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts. 20(4): 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015e. ‘Between Professional Precariousness and Creative Self-Organisation: The Free Performing Arts Scene in Germany’, in: Pascal Gielen and Nico Dockx. Eds. Mobile Autonomy: Exercises in Artists’ Self-Organisation. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. ‘Art as ethical practice: anthropological observations on and beyond theatre’. World Arthttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21500894.2017.1308966.

  • ———. forthcoming (2018). ‘Interstitial Agents: Negotiating Diversity in Theatre’, in: Bock, Jan-Jonathan and Sharon Macdonald. Eds. Germany’s Differences – Newcomers, Nationhood, and Negotiating Belonging. Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vietta, E. 1955. Darmstädter Gespräch: Theater. Darmstadt: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I. 2002. Negotiating Cultures‬: Eugenio Barba and the Intercultural Debate. Manchester: Manchester University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Tinius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tinius, J. (2018). Artistic Diplomacy: On Civic Engagement and Transnational Theatre. In: Breed, A., Prentki, T. (eds) Performance and Civic Engagement. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66517-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics