Abstract
The principles of responsibility and accountability have increasingly become a significant concept for the political capability to act independently and make decisions without superior authorization.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For different ways on how public deliberation could work at the core of formal democratic decision making, see Goodin (2008). Cf. also Warren and Pearse (2008) who analyze the case of a citizen assembly in British Columbia, Canada, that was empowered to make a decision on the electoral system which led to a referendum. Cf. also Chambers (2012).
- 2.
References
Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice. Public participation in environmental decisions. Resources for the Future: Washington.
Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice and dilemma. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The sage handbook of governance (pp. 1–16). London: Sage.
Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forst, R. (2001). The rule of Reasons. Three models of deliberative democracy. Ratio Juris, 14(4), 345–378.
Funtowicz, S. A., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for a post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–752.
Goodin, R. E. (2008). Innovating democracy. Democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goodin, R. E., & Dryzek, J. S. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society, 34(2), 219–244.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Haas, P. M. (2004). When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 569–592.
Hampel, J., Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2001). Beyond “red” hope and “green” distrust. Public perceptions of genetic engineering in Germany. Polite, 16(60), 68–82.
IRGC, International Risk Governance Council. (2013). Risk governance guidelines for unconventional gas developments. Lausanne: IRGC.
James, B. (1997). Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: Capabilities, resources and opportunities. In J. Bohman, & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy. Essays on reason and politics (pp. 321–348). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Klinke, A. (2006). Demokratisches REGIeren jenseits des Staates. Deliberative Politik im nordamerikanischen Große Seen-Regime. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publisher.
Klinke, A. (2009). Deliberative Politik in transnationalen Räumen—demokratische Legitimation und Effektivität der grenzüberschreitenden Wasser- und Umweltpolitik zwischen Kanada und USA. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 50(4), 774–803.
Klinke, A. (2016). Democratic theory. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 86–100). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Klinke, A., Dreyer, M., Renn, O., Stirling, A., & van Zwanenberg, P. (2006). Precautionary risk regulation in European governance. Journal of Risk Research, 9(4), 373–392.
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22(6), 1071–1094.
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk governance: Contemporary and future challenges. In J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, & C. Ruden (Eds.), Regulating chemical risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives on european and global challenges (pp. 9–27). Cambridge University Press.
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2014). Expertise and experience: A deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 442–465.
Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2012). Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 15(3), 273–292.
Liberatore, A., & Funtowicz, S. A. (2003). ‘Democratizing’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy: What does this mean, and why bother? Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 146–150.
MacKenzie, M. K., & Warren, M. E. (2012). Two trust-based uses of minipublics in democratic systems. In J. Mansbridge, & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems. Deliberative democracy at a larger scale (pp. 95–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (2006). Conflict and self-interest in deliberation. In S. Besson, & J. L. Marti (Eds.) Deliberative democracy and its discontent (pp. 107–132). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont, C., Manin, B., & Marti, J. L. (2010). The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 64–100.
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren,M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Mansbridge, & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems. Deliberative democracy at a larger scale, (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
National Research Council. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington: The National Academies Press.
Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world. Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. M. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Renn, O., Klinke, A., & van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO, 40(2), 231–246.
Renn, O. (2015). Ethikkommission: Wie legitim ist die Legitimation der Politik durch Wissenschaft? In P. Weingart, & G.G. Wagner (Eds.), Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung im Praxistest (pp. 17–34). Velbrück: Weilerswist.
Simone, C. (2012). Deliberation and mass democracy. In J. Mansbridge, & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems. deliberative democracy at a larger scale (pp. 52–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, C. (2012). Rational Deliberation among Experts and Citizens. In J. Mansbridge, & J. Parkinson (Eds.), Deliberative systems. Deliberative democracy at a larger scale (pp. 27–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WBGU. (2000a). German Advisory Council on Global Environmental Change. World in Transition. Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks. Annual Report 1998. Berlin: Springer.
WBGU. (2000b). German Advisory Council on Global Environmental Change. World in Transition. Conservation and Sustainable Use of the Biosphere. Annual Report 1999. London: Earthscan.
Wildavsky, A. B. (1987). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klinke, A., Renn, O. (2018). Distributed Responsibility in Risk Governance. In: Wilderer, P., Renn, O., Grambow, M., Molls, M., Mainzer, K. (eds) Sustainable Risk Management. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66233-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66233-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66232-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66233-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)