Skip to main content

A Framework for Cloud Selection Based on Business Process Profile

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 299))

  • 2054 Accesses

Abstract

The lack of a system that assists in the business process out-sourcing to the cloud hinders the widespread adoption of this emerging computing paradigm. To the best of our knowledge, there is no system that has tackled the business process outsourcing to the cloud issues such as selecting the activities to outsource and the cloud services to support their execution based on objective and subjective assessments of cloud services. In this paper, we propose a system tackling these issues by using previous cloud users experience for the subjective assessment. The objective assessment is based on simulations using the well-known CloudSim toolkit. The aggregation of the objective and subjective assessment allows for more reliable cloud service selection. Furthermore, we propose an optimal deployment of business process activities by proposing a novel penalty based genetic algorithm while considering business process profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sheikh Mahbub, H., Sebastian, R., Max, M.: Towards a trust management system for cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 10th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, TRUSTCOM 2011, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 933–939. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, G., Bai, X., Huang, X., Li, M., Zhou, L.: Evaluating services on the cloud using ontology QoS model. In: Proceedings of 2011 IEEE 6th International Symposium on Service Oriented System (SOSE), pp. 312–317, December 2011

    Google Scholar 

  3. ur Rehman, Z., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K.: Multi-criteria IaaS service selection based on QoS history. In: 2013 IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA), pp. 1129–1135, March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. ur Rehman, Z., Hussain, O.K., Parvin, S., Hussain, F.K.: A framework for user feedback based cloud service monitoring. In: 2012 Sixth International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems, pp. 257–262, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bo, P., Lillian, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: Smicloud: a framework for comparing and ranking cloud services. In: 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 210–218, December 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, M., Ranjan, R., Menzel, M., Nepal, S., Strazdins, P., Wang, L.: A cloud infrastructure service recommendation system for optimizing real-time QoS provisioning constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.01828 (2015)

  8. Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, vol. 44. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Srivastava, A., Sorenson, P.G.: Service selection based on customer rating of quality of service attributes. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pp. 1–8, July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, L., Wang, Y.: A trust vector approach to service-oriented applications. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pp. 270–277, September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arezoo, J., Leyli, M.: Cloud service ranking as a multi objective optimization problem. J. Supercomput. 72(5), 1897–1926 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan, W., Yang, S., Perros, H., Pei, J.: A multi-dimensional trust-aware cloud service selection mechanism based on evidential reasoning approach. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 12(2), 208–219 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han, Y.-B., Sun, J.-Y., Wang, G.-L., Li, H.-F.: A cloud-based BPM architecture with user-end distribution of non-compute-intensive activities and sensitive data. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 25(6), 1157–1167 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duipmans, E.F., Pires, L.F., da Silva Santos, L.O.B.: Towards a BPM cloud architecture with data and activity distribution. In: 2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, pp. 165–171, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  16. Duipmans, E.F., Pires, L., da Silva Santos, L.O.B.: A transformation-based approach to business process management in the cloud. J. Grid Comput. 12(2), 191–219 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Povoa, L.V., de Souza, W.L., Pires, L.F., do Prado, A.F.: An approach to the decomposition of business processes for execution in the cloud. In: 2014 IEEE/ACS 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pp. 470–477, November 2014

    Google Scholar 

  18. Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C.A., Buyya, R.: CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. Pract. Exp. 41(1), 23–50 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu, Y.-B., Wang, Y.-P., Guo, F.-Y.: A new penalty based genetic algorithm for constrained optimization problems. In: 2005 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 3025–3029, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gillen, A.L., Bozman, J.S.: White paper: business-critical workloads: Supporting business-critical computing with an integrated server platform. Technical report, Microsoft Corporation, April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liwei, L., Nikolay, M., Dong-Ling, X.: Context similarity metric for multidimensional service recommendation. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 18(1), 73–104 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalyanmoy, D.: Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, vol. 16. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Goettelmann, E., Dahman, K., Gateau, B., Dubois, E., Godart, C.: A security risk assessment model for business process deployment in the cloud. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp. 307–314. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rekik, M., Boukadi, K., Ben-Abdallah, H.: A comprehensive framework for business process outsourcing to the cloud. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC), pp .179–186. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouna Rekik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rekik, M., Boukadi, K., Ben-Abdallah, H. (2017). A Framework for Cloud Selection Based on Business Process Profile. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics