Skip to main content

Colloquium Participants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Walter Lippmann Colloquium
  • 569 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a brief overview of the Colloquium’s participants, within the broader framework of their life, their philosophical and economic convictions, and their professional accomplishments and contributions. The organizations to which participants belonged and the links and connections between some of them are also addressed. Particular attention is paid to the context of the 1930s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chautemps proceeded to nationalize the railroads and create the SNCF.

  2. 2.

    Auboin (1936).

  3. 3.

    Aron ([1982] 1999, 76–77).

  4. 4.

    Aron (1939).

  5. 5.

    The title can be translated as “Contemporary German Sociology ”.

  6. 6.

    Aron saw in Oppenheimer an authentic liberal keen to make liberalism less inegalitarian. But while Oppenheimer would exercise significant influence over German “neo-liberalism ” and over those interested in a “third way”—Röpke , Rüstow , as well as the young Ludwig Erhard who was his student—Aron remained skeptical of his contributions. Aron himself was at the time more of a socialist, even if he already inclined toward liberalism.

  7. 7.

    Aron (1937).

  8. 8.

    On Laroque, see Jabbari (2012).

  9. 9.

    Baverez (2015).

  10. 10.

    Baudin (1937).

  11. 11.

    Baudin (1941).

  12. 12.

    On Baudin’s monetary ideas, see Baudin (1936a; Baudin 1936b; Baudin 1936c; Baudin 1938) .

  13. 13.

    Baudin (1953, 146) .

  14. 14.

    Boyd (1997, 59–60).

  15. 15.

    Castillejo (1937).

  16. 16.

    In 1934, at the invitation of the School of Corporative Sciences of Pisa, led by Giuseppe Bottai , the minister of corporations of the Fascist regime, Condliffe agreed to submit a text—like other economist colleagues supportive of the New Deal or English socialism—on the recent transformations in the era of general interventionism and dirigisme . One should not see in this contribution the sign of an allegiance to Fascism . On the other hand, there is no question that it bears witness to a sympathy for dirigiste theses, or at least to an absence of strong hostility. On the subject of the new economic and social policies in Australia , Condliffe defended the progress achieved in the realm of social protection . As far as he was concerned, capitalism and liberalism had to renew themselves.

  17. 17.

    Fleming (1998).

  18. 18.

    Ehrmann (1957, 47) and Audier (2012a, 216).

  19. 19.

    Detoeuf (1936, 37) . The complexity of Detoeuf as a figure is illustrated by the magazine he co-founded and which left a mark on intellectual life in the late 1930s, Les Nouveaux Cahiers. Launched in March 1937, gone in 1940, this magazine—bimonthly then monthly—was a strange intellectual and doctrinal laboratory where technocratic and modernizing executives, trade unionists, economics, and intellectuals met.—Some contributors were on the right , whereas others, more numerous, were on the left . Several of its members would pursue their career under the Vichy regime, but not all, and these trajectories or excesses should not lead to a too-hasty judgment of this complex experience. Such an attempt at rapprochement between technocratic industrialists and trade unionists would re-occur during the brief existence of the Centre international d’Etudes pour la rénovation du libéralisme : Rougier and especially Marlio wanted to invite trade unionists and socialists. The writings of Detoeuf also express these attempts at rapprochement.

  20. 20.

    See Cubeddu (1993); Menger (1934–1936) and Ebenstein (2001, 21–30).

  21. 21.

    These lectures were soon published under the title Prices and Production, 1931.

  22. 22.

    Howson (2011, 178).

  23. 23.

    Among his rare liberal colleagues, one should mention Edwin Cannan , who played a role due to his interest in English and Scottish liberalism.

  24. 24.

    Hayek (1983, 425).

  25. 25.

    Hayek (1937).

  26. 26.

    On the socialist calculation debate, see White 2012 (32–67); for Hayek’s contributions, see Caldwell (2004, 205–231).

  27. 27.

    The edited volume, prefaced and concluded by Hayek, was translated into French in 1939—by Daniel Villey (who would become an important player in the Centre International d’Etudes pour la Rénovation du Libéralisme, then in the Mont Pelerin Society ), at the Médicis publishing house under the title L’économie dirigée en régime collectiviste.

  28. 28.

    “[I]t is a fatal delusion to believe that authoritarian government can be confined to economic matters. The tragic fact is that dictatorial direction cannot remain confined to economic matters but is bound to expand and to become ‘totalitarian’ in the strict sense of the word. The economic dictator will soon find himself forced, even against his wishes, to assume dictatorship over the whole of the political and cultural life of the people.” (Hayek 1938)

  29. 29.

    White (2012, 155–173).

  30. 30.

    Hayek (1967).

  31. 31.

    See also Cubeddu (1993).

  32. 32.

    Hayek (1967, 84).

  33. 33.

    Hayek (1994, 128). One of the reasons that is often cited is that The Road to Serfdom had led to public notoriety of Hayek which harmed his academic reputation. There were moreover important methodological disagreements between the Austrian School and the members of Chicago’s economics department, which Hayek as well as Milton Friedman would later acknowledge.

  34. 34.

    Liggio (1994, 517).

  35. 35.

    Salerno (1992, 107–108).

  36. 36.

    See for instance his work , prefaced by Rappard , on monetary problems after World War I in Poland , Austria , and Czechoslovakia , 1931 (Heilperin 1931).

  37. 37.

    Salerno (1992).

  38. 38.

    Heilperin (1939).

  39. 39.

    Salerno (1992).

  40. 40.

    Heilperin (1967).

  41. 41.

    Anon (1973, 24).

  42. 42.

    Lavergne (1932, 422–434).

  43. 43.

    In the July 1936 edition of the journal L’Année politique française et étrangère, he provided a favorable account of Rougier’s Les Mystiques économiques, emphasizing that the philosopher pleads for a “mitigated and reasonable liberalism”.

  44. 44.

    Lavergne (1938, 219) .

  45. 45.

    Riccio (1994, 95–138) and Steel (1980, 310–326).

  46. 46.

    Riccio (1994) and Steel (1980, 299–326).

  47. 47.

    Mantoux (1937) and Mantoux (1946).

  48. 48.

    It is the subject of the famous conference given by Halévy in 1936, “L’ère des tyrannies”, that Wilhelm Röpke also appreciated

  49. 49.

    Audier (2012b).

  50. 50.

    It was Bouglé who signed the preface of Marjolin’s university work , L’évolution du syndicalisme aux États-Unis: de Washington à Roosevelt (Alcan, 1936) (“the development of trade unionism in the United States : from Washington to the United States ”).

  51. 51.

    As Aron would remember in his interview book Le Spectateur engagé (1981), the two men were “wholeheartedly” with the Front populaire, but wanted to change its economic program (Aron 1981).

  52. 52.

    Marjolin (1986, 123).

  53. 53.

    Marjolin (1941).

  54. 54.

    Notably in his 1938 work Le sort du capitalisme, (the fate of capitalism).

  55. 55.

    Marlio (1931, 1938).

  56. 56.

    Marlio (1946).

  57. 57.

    Marlio (1943).

  58. 58.

    Marlio (1951).

  59. 59.

    On the significance of the Musée Social, see Horne (2002).

  60. 60.

    Audier (2012a, 216).

  61. 61.

    Mercier (1936) and Kuisel (1967, 128–135).

  62. 62.

    Audier (2012b, 141).

  63. 63.

    See White (2012, 32–67).

  64. 64.

    One should add, among the future invitees of the Lippmann Colloquium, Lionel Robbins , future colleague of Hayek at the LSE . The book of Robbins , Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science (1932), was to a degree inspired by Mises and the Austrian school.

  65. 65.

    Mises ([1920] 1935). Also see Cubeddu (1993, 111–120).

  66. 66.

    Mises (1944).

  67. 67.

    Howson (2011, 237).

  68. 68.

    Hülsmann (2007, 727). It is important to remember that at the time the Lippmann Colloquium was held, Mises was working on a book against statism and totalitarianism that would only be published posthumously in 1978, with a preface by Alfred Müller-Armack, under the title Im Namen des Staates oder die Gefahren des Kollektivismus (Stuttgart: Verlag Bonn Aktuell). 

  69. 69.

    Piatier (1938a).

  70. 70.

    One reviewer regretted that Piatier did not emphasize the risks of an excessive tax burden to vibrant economic growth (Schwob 1939, 91).

  71. 71.

    Now the University of Manchester.

  72. 72.

    Polanyi , Michael. 1946. Science , Faith and Society. New Brunswick and London : Transaction Publishers. p. 8.

  73. 73.

    These research projects provoked Hayek’s interest. It is also in Economica that Polanyi published in 1941 an article titled “The growth of thought in society”.

  74. 74.

    Scott and Moleski (2005, 161).

  75. 75.

    Polanyi had often expressed his support for the recommendations of the author of the General Theory.

  76. 76.

    In 1956, Röpke expressed to the secretary of the Mont Pelerin Society his frustration with Polanyi’s analyses, which he deemed too favorable to Tito’s Yugoslavia and its economic system. Röpke asked Hunold to “submit the case” of Polanyi to Hayek—that is to say, contemplate his expulsion. But Hayek ended the controversy, staying on good terms with Polanyi (Solchany 2015, 367).

  77. 77.

    Polanyi’s understanding of science differed from that of Karl Popper , and even with regard to the concept of the “open society” Polanyi’s understanding differed from Popper’s.

  78. 78.

    Possony (1938).

  79. 79.

    Possony and Pournelle (1970).

  80. 80.

    See Gerken (1958) and Hennecke (2005).

  81. 81.

    For a clear analysis of the crisis of the Weimar republic and the constitutional aspects of the crisis, see Kennedy (2004, in particular 119–153).

  82. 82.

    Solchany (2015, 190).

  83. 83.

    See Röpke’s chapter “Modern Mass Society” in Röpke (1960 [1958]).

  84. 84.

    In a letter dated October 4th, 1938, shortly after the Walter Lippmann Colloquium was held, and traumatized by the Munich agreement, Röpke despairingly compared Chamberlain to Hindenburg, both having shown culpable weakness toward National Socialism . Cited in Solchany (2015, 122).

  85. 85.

    See Gregg (2010, 139) and Ebeling (2010, 192).

  86. 86.

    White (2012, 243).

  87. 87.

    The English translation of Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage was published under the title A Humane Economy.

  88. 88.

    On the influence of Röpke and Rüstow in Germany, see Hahn (1993). On the social market economy in Germany, see Nicholls (1994). For an English translation of foundational texts related to the social market economy, see Wünsche (1982). See also Zmirak (2001), and Bonefeld (2012).

  89. 89.

    Burgin (2012) and Hartwell (1995, 117–133).

  90. 90.

    His grandfather, Jean-Claude Paul Rougier (1826–1901), author of a liberal treatise titled La liberté commerciale, les douanes et les traités de commerce (1878), had been the creator and first holder of the Chair of Political Economy at the Faculty of Lyon, and Vice-President of the association in Lyon titled Société d’économie politique et d’économie sociale, where Louis Rougier , decades later, held a conference in 1939 on “L’offensive du néo-libéralisme”.

  91. 91.

    Rougier met Ferrero for the first time in 1929 and paid him a visit afterward in Florence, while the latter was under police surveillance by Mussolini’s regime. Regretting that the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation did not respond with more zeal to help Ferrero , Rougier invoked the help of the French socialist Albert Thomas to persuade his old friend Mussolini to give Ferrero an exit visa. After his liberation in 1931, Ferrero taught at the Institut universitaires des Hautes Etudes internationales in Geneva, where numerous “neo-liberal” figures would emerge, among whom Rougier himself and Röpke , also a close friend and admirer of Ferrero .

  92. 92.

    Rougier (1954, 103).

  93. 93.

    Rougier (1938, 9).

  94. 94.

    Rougier (1938, 34).

  95. 95.

    Chivvis (2010, 18).

  96. 96.

    Rueff (1931).

  97. 97.

    Rueff (1934).

  98. 98.

    Rueff (1935).

  99. 99.

    Rueff (1958).

  100. 100.

    Rueff (1938).

  101. 101.

    Rueff (1958).

  102. 102.

    Rueff (1979).

  103. 103.

    Hence, Rueff wrote the preface to the French translation of Röpke’s Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage, and Röpke wrote the preface to the German translation of Rueff’s L’ordre social.

  104. 104.

    Rueff strongly supported the 1957 Treaty of Rome, whereas Röpke was a staunch critic of the treaty.

  105. 105.

    See Meier-Rust (1993).

  106. 106.

    Rüstow (1980, xii–xxii).

  107. 107.

    Solchany (2015, 170).

  108. 108.

    Schüßler (2009, 3–17).

  109. 109.

    He became a friend of Walter Eucken and maintained a correspondence with him.

  110. 110.

    The association founded by economists of the “historical school” favorable to “social” policies.

  111. 111.

    Audier (2012b, 133).

  112. 112.

    Rüstow (1980, xviii).

  113. 113.

    Rüstow (1950–1957).

  114. 114.

    See Hahn (1993). See also: Bonefeld (2012).

  115. 115.

    Vanberg observes that “the slightly interventionist, outcome-oriented flavor of the concept of the social market economy was much more reflective of the thoughts of Müller-Armack , who coined the term, and of Röpke and Rüstow than of the founders of the Freiburg School who advocated a strictly procedural and rule-oriented liberalism” (Vanberg 2004, 2).

  116. 116.

    Ritchey (2012).

  117. 117.

    Anon. [Van Zeeland , Marcel] (1937).

  118. 118.

    Audier (2012b, 107). On the important role of Ortega y Gasset and Francesco Saverio Nitti —two important authors for Rougier —during the 1930s, in the revision of liberalism and the promotion of a federal Europe (see Visone 2015).

References

  • Anon. [Van Zeeland, Marcel]. 1937. Révision des valeurs. Brussels: La Renaissance du Livre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. 1973. The New York Times. Bruce C. Hopper of Harvard Dies: Special to the New York Times. July 7, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, Raymond. 1937. Réflexions sur les problèmes économiques français. Revue de metaphysique et morale 44 (4): 793–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. Remarques sur l’objectivité des sciences sociales. Theoria 5 (2): 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1945. “La chance du socialisme.” Les Temps Modernes. In Politique française articles 1944–1977. Paris: Editions de Fallois.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. The New York Times. Bruce C. Hopper of Harvard Dies: Special to the New York Times. July 7, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Le Spectateur engagé. Ed. Jean-Louis Missika and Dominique Wolton. Paris: Editions de Fallois.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999 [1982]. Entretiens avec Raymond Aron. 28 mai 1982. In Raymond Aron, la philosophie de l’histoire et les sciences sociales, ed. Jean-Claude Chamboredon, 76–77. Paris: Ed. Rue d’Ulm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auboin, Roger. 1936. Libéralisme pratique. L’Europe nouvelle 985 (December 26): 1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audier, Serge. 2012a. Is There a French Neo-Liberalism? In French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day, ed. Raf Geenens and Helena Rosenblatt, 208–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. Néo-libéralisme(s): une archéologie intellectuelle. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudin, Louis. 1936a. La monnaie et la formation des prix. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936b. Les illusions du crédit. Montréal: Editions Lévesque.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1936c. Histoire des faits et doctrines monétaires. Paris: Les cours de droit.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1937. L’utopie soviétique. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. La monnaie. Ce que tout le monde devrait en savoir. Paris: Librairie de Médicis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1941. Preface to La Doctrine Corporative by Maurice Bouvier-Ajam. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1953. L’aube d’un nouveau libéralisme. Paris: Librarie de Médicis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baverez, Nicolas. 2015. Life and Works: Raymond Aron, Philosopher and Freedom Fighter. In The Companion to Raymond Aron, ed. José Colen and Elisabeth Dutartre-Michaut, 3–14. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonefeld, Werner. 2012. Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism. New Political Economy 17 (5): 633–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Carolyn. 1997. Historia Patria: Politics, History, and National Identity in Spain, 1875–1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgin, Angus. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets Since the Great Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, Bruce. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillejo, José. 1937. War of Ideas in Spain: Philosophy, Politics and Education. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivvis, Christopher. 2010. The Monetary Conservative: Jacques Rueff and Twentieth-Century Free Market Thought. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubeddu, Raimondo. 1993. The Philosophy of the Austrian School. Trans. Rachel M. Costa. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detoeuf, Auguste. 1936. La fin du libéralisme. Bulletin du Centre Polytechnicien des Études Économiques 31–32: 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling, Richard. 2010. Political Economy, Public Policy and Monetary Economics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, Alan. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann, Henry Walter. 1957. Organized Business in France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, Grant. 1998. Condliffe, John Bell. In The Dictionary of New Zealand Biography, vol. 4. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerken, Heinrich. 1958. Die Sozial- und Wirtschaftslehre Wilhelm Röpkes in ihrer Bedeutung für die Pädagogik. Mühlheim: Verlag Setzkorn-Schleifhacken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Samuel. 2010. Wilhelm Röpke’s Political Economy. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, Roland. 1993. Marktwirtschaft und Sozialromantik. Die programmatische Erneuerung des Liberalismus in Deutschland unter dem Einfluss der Ideen Wilhelm Röpkes und Alexander Rüstows. Egelsbach: Hänsel-Hohenhausen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, R.M. 1995. A History of the Mont Pèlerin Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich, ed. 1935. Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism by N.G. Pierson, Ludwig von Mises, Georg Halm and Enrico Barone. London: Routledge. (Translated in French in 1939 as L’économie dirigée en régime collectiviste. Trans. Marie-Thérèse Génin et al. Paris: Librarie de Médicis.)

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ed. 1937. Economics and Knowledge. Economica IV, New series 13: 33–54. Re-printed in Hayek, Friedrich. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago, 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 1938. Freedom and the Economic System. Contemporary Review 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1944] 2007. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 1967. Kinds of Rationalism. In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. 82–95. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Interview with Armen Alchian, November 11, 1978. In University of California Oral History Project. Los Angeles: University of California, p. 425. https://archive.org/download/nobelprizewinnin00haye/nobelprizewinnin00haye.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2017.

  • ———. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Ed. Stephen Kresge and Leif Wenar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilperin, Michael. 1931. Le Problème monétaire d’après-guerre et sa solution en Pologne, en Autriche et en Tchécoslovaquie, preface by William Rappard. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1939. International Monetary Economics. New York: Longmans, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Le phénomène Jacques Rueff. In Les Fondements philosophiques des systèmes économiques: Textes de Jacques Rueff et essais rédigés en son honneur, ed. Emil Maria Claassen, 25–34. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennecke, Hans Jörg. 2005. Wilhelm Röpke. Ein Leben in der Brandung. Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, Janet. 2002. A Social Laboratory for Modern France: The Musée Social and the Rise of the Welfare State. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, Susan. 2011. Lionel Robbins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsmann, Jörg-Guido. 2007. Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism. Auburn: Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbari, Eric. 2012. Pierre Laroque and the Welfare State in Postwar France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Ellen. 2004. Constitutional Failure: Carl Schmitt in Weimar. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuisel, Richard. 1967. Ernest Mercier: French Technocrat. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavergne, Bernard. 1932. L’économie moderne et la doctrine libérale. L’année politique française et étrangère 7 (November): 422–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. Essor et décadence du capitalisme. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liggio, Leonard. 1994. Law and Legislation in Hayek’s Legal Philosophy. Southeastern University Law Review 23 (3): 517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantoux, Étienne. 1937. La Théorie Générale de Keynes. Revue d’économie politique 51: 1559–1590.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1946. The Carthaginian Peace; or The Economic Consequences of Mr. Keynes. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjolin, Robert. 1936. L’évolution du syndicalisme aux États-Unis: de Washington à Roosevelt. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlio, Louis. 1931. Les Ententes industrielles internationales. Paris: Imprimerie Crété.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. Le Sort du Capitalisme. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1943. La révolution d’hier, d’aujourd’hui et de demain. New York: Brentano’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1946. Lionel. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1951. Le Cercle infernal. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1941. Prix, monnaie et production. Essai sur les mouvements économiques de longue durée. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Le travail d’une vie. Mémoires, 1911–1986. Paris: Robert Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Rust, Kathrin. 1993. Alexander Rüstow. Geschichtsdeutung und liberales Engagement. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, Carl. 1934–1936. The Collected Works of Carl Menger (4 vols.). Ed. Friedrich Hayek. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, Ernest. 1936. U.R.S.S.: Réflexions. Paris: Éditions du Centre Polytechnicien d’ Études Économiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, Ludwig. 1920. Die Wirschaftsrechnung im sozialistischen Gemeinwesen. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften 47: 86–121. Translated as “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth” in Collectivist Economic Planning, ed. F.A. Hayek. 1935. pp. 87–130. London: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1944. Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1978. Erinnerungen von Ludwig v. Mises. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer. [Available in English as Notes and Recollections with the Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics, ed. Bettina Bien Greaves. 2013. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, Anthony James. 1994. Freedom with Responsibility: The Social Market Economy in Germany, 1918–1963. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatier, André. 1937. Contrôle des devises dans l’économie du IIIe Reich. Paris: P. Hartmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938a. Revue des livres. Politique étrangère 3 (6): 634–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938b. L’évasion fiscale et l’assistance administrative entre États. Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1941. The Growth of Thought in Society. Economica 8 (32): 428–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1946. Science, Faith and Society. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possony, Stefan. 1938. To-morrow’s War: Its Planning, Management and Cost. London: Hodge & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Possony, Stefan, and Jerry Pournelle. 1970. The Strategy of Technology : Winning the Decisive War. Cambridge: University Press of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccio, Barry. 1994. Walter Lippmann: Odyssey of a Liberal. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, Dianne. 2012. Guide to the Papers of the Alfred Schütz Family. Leo Baeck Institute for Jewish History. http://findingaids.cjh.org/?pID=1525175

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1932. Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, Louis. 1938. Les Mystiques économiques. Comment l’on passe des démocraties libérales aux Etats totalitaires. Paris: Médicis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1954. Comment une mission en Russie soviétique a fait de moi un libéral. L’informateur de l’entreprise à capital personnel 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier, Jean-Claude Paul. 1878. La liberté commerciale, les douanes et les traités de commerce. Paris: Guillaumin et cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röpke, Wilhelm. 1960 [1958]. A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co. (First published in 1958 as Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueff, Jacques. 1931. L’assurance chômage, cause du chômage permanent. Revue d’Économie Politique 45 (March–April): 211–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1934. Pourquoi, malgré tout, je reste libéral. Bulletin du Centre Polytechnicien d’études économiques 14–15: 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1935. La crise du capitalisme. Revue Bleue January: 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1938. Le libéralisme et la question sociale. Remarks delivered at the Walter Lippmann Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1958. Une mutation dans les structures politiques: le Marché Institutionnel des Communautés Européennes. Revue d’économie politique 1: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Oeuvres Complètes IV: L’Ordre Social. Ed. Emil-Maria Claassen and Georges Lane. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüstow, Alexander. 1950–1957. Ortsbestimmung der Gegenwart. Eine universal geschichtliche Kulturkritik. Erlenbach-Zürich: Rentsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüstow, Dankwart. 1980. Alexander Rüstow: A Biographical Sketch. In Freedom and Domination: A Historical Critique of Civilization, xiii–xxii. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, Joseph. 1992. Gold and the International Monetary System: The Contribution of Michael A. Heilperin. In The Gold Standard: Perspectives in the Austrian School, ed. Llewellyn H. Rockwell, 107–108. Auburn, AL: Ludwig yon Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, William Taussig, and Martin X. Moleski. 2005. Michael Polanyi: Scientist and Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schüßler, Werner. 2009. Tillich’s Life and Works. In The Cambridge Companion to Paul Tillich, ed. Paul Manning, 3–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwob, Philippe. 1939. André Piatier: L’évasion fiscal et l’assistance administrative entre états. Politique étrangere 4 (1): 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solchany, Jean. 2015. Wilhelm Röpke, l’autre Hayek. Paris: Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, Ronald. 1980. Walter Lippmann and the American Century. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, Viktor. 2004. The Freiburg School: Walter Eucken and Ordoliberalism. Freiburg discussion papers on Constitutional Economics No. 04/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visone, Tommaso. 2015. L’Europa oltre l’Europa. Metamorfosi di un’idea nella crisi degli anni Trenta. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Lawrence. 2012. The Clash of Economic Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wünsche, Horst Friedrich, ed. 1982. Standard Texts on the Social Market Economy. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zmirak, John. 2001. Wilhelm Röpke: Swiss Localist, Global Economist. Wilmington: ISI Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reinhoudt, J., Audier, S. (2018). Colloquium Participants. In: The Walter Lippmann Colloquium. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65885-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics