Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL))

  • 1773 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents benefits and drawbacks of using humor in learning/for teaching and training. We introduce two theories about humor and learning, namely the Instructional Humor Processing Theory and the Perceived Humor Hypotheses. Among the consequences of humor in instruction are cognitive, social, as well as motivational and affective ones: Humor may enhance learning if tied to the course content, humor may increase teachers’ immediacy and the presenters’ likability, and humor may foster positive affect and thus motivation. However, it may reduce the perceived credibility of the presenter and does not necessarily improve effectiveness or performance. Also, the use of humor interacts with personality. We present findings about the mode of presentation, that is, about the use of humor in textbooks, tests, and online instruction. Research in school/university settings serves as the basis and nearly the only setting of previous research; we discuss the limited research on instruction in work contexts. Future research avenues as well as recommendations for practical use close this chapter. For instance, techniques recommended for teaching students (e.g., smile, relate humor to important information) can be applied to trainings or instruction in the work context.

The original version of this chapter was revised: See the “Chapter Note” section at the end of this chapter for details. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65691-5_9

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, L. (2014). Don’t forget, thursday is test[icle] time! Sex Education, 14(4), 387–399. doi:10.1080/14681811.2014.918539.

  • Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S.-J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115–144. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.496867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, H. G., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Derks, P. (1998). The effects of humor on verbal and imaginal problem solving. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 11(1), 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A. (1998). Professors are from Mars, students are from Snickers: How to write and deliver humor in the classroom and in professional presentations. Madison, WI: Magna Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., & Nanda, J. (2006). A randomized trial of humor effects on test anxiety and test performance. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 19(4), 425–454. doi:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.021.

  • Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2015). Exploratory theoretical tests of the instructor humor–student learning link. Communication Education, 64(1), 45–64. doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, E. R., & Balshine, S. (2006). The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(1), 29–39. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., Brown, D., Parks, S. L., & Zillmann, D. (1983). Children’s imitation of a ridiculed model. Human Communication Research, 10(2), 243–255. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00013.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A. R., & Elliott, S. M. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research, 8(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., Comisky, P. W., Crane, J. S., & Zillmann, D. (1980). Relationship between college teachers’ use of humor in the classroom and students’ evaluations of their teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, K. A. (2011). The impact of humor on memory: Is the humor effect about humor? Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1). doi:10.1515/humr.2011.002.

  • Chabeli, M. (2008). Humor: A pedagogical tool to promote learning. Curationis, 31(3), 51–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, D., & Wang, L. (2014). Examining the energizing effects of humor: The influence of humor on persistence behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9396-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, C. E. (2015). Humor in intercultural interaction as both content and process in the classroom. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 28(3), 375–395. doi:10.1515/humor-2015-0065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, J. L., Deitz, S. R., & Hazaleus, S. L. (1981). Effects of humor and test anxiety on performance, worry, and emotionality in naturally occurring exams. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5(2), 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, E. S., & Efran, J. S. (1967). The angered: Their susceptibility to varieties of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(2), 233–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Can humour make students love statistics? Humor and Statistics, 22(3), 210–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipowicz, A. (2006). From positive affect to creativity: The surprising role of suprise. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, M. F., Shifflett, B., & Sibley, R. E. (2006). A comparison of online (high tech) and traditional (high touch) learning in business communication courses in Silicon Valley. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 210–214. doi:10.3200/JOEB.81.4.210-214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B., Wanzer, M. B., & Wojtaszczyk, A. M. (2008). Assessing students’ perceptions of inappropriate and appropriate teacher humor. Communication Education, 57(2), 266–288. doi:10.1080/03634520701687183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodboy, A. K., Booth-Butterfield, M., Bolkan, S., & Griffin, D. J. (2015). The role of instructor humor and students’ educational orientations in student learning, extra effort, participation, and out-of-class communication. Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 44–61. doi:10.1080/01463373.2014.965840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1992). Students’ perceptions of teacher behaviors as motivating and demotivating factors in college classes. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greatbatch, D., & Clark, T. (2003). Displaying group cohesiveness: Humour and laughter in the public lectures of management gurus. Human Relations, 56(12), 1515–1544. doi:10.1177/00187267035612004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampes, W. P. (2010). The relation between humor styles and empathy. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, W. E., & Thomas, J. W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40(4), 52–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers & Education, 88, 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janes, L. M., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Jeer pressure: The behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(4), 474–485. doi:10.1177/0146167200266006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M., & Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(1), 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. M., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1982). Relationship between humor in introductory textbooks and student’s evaluations of the texts’ appeal and effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 50(1), 235–241. doi:10.2466/pr0.1982.50.1.235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krovitz, G. (2007, May 9). Using humor in online classes. Educator’s Voice, 8(2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N. A., McKenzie, S. D., & Belanger, K. A. (1995). Cognitive appraisals and individual differences in sense of humor: Motivational and affective implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, S. A., Cohen, J. L., & Russler, K. M. (2010). Humor on learning in the college classroom: Evaluating benefits and drawbacks from instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(4), 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMorris, R. F., Boothroyd, R. A., & Pietrangelo, D. J. (1997). Humor in educational testing: A review and discussion. Applied Measurement in Education, 10(3), 269–297. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1003_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., & Members of COMM 600. (2014). College student learning, motivation, and satisfaction as a function of effective instructor communication behaviors. Southern Communication Journal, 79(1), 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuliep, J. W. (1991). An examination of the content of high school teachers’ humor in the classroom and the development of an inductively derived taxonomy of classroom humor. Communication Education, 40, 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34–77. doi:10.1080/10463281003765323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaw, C. Y. (2014). The effects of humor cartoons in a series of bestselling academic books. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 27(3), 499–520. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, R. (2000). Laughter: A scientific investigation. New York: Viking Adult.

    Google Scholar 

  • RecepoÄźlu, E., Kilinç, A. Ç., & Çepni, O. (2011). Examining teachers’ motivation level according to school principals’ humor styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(17), 928–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddington, E., & Waring, H. Z. (2015). Understanding the sequential resources for doing humor in the language classroom. Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, 28(1), 1–23. doi:10.1515/humor-2014-0144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, C. (2015). The use of humor to help bridge cultural divides: An exploration of a workplace cultural awareness workshop. Social Work with Groups, 38, 152–169. doi:10.1080/01609513.2014.968944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroglou, V., & Scariot, C. (2002). Humor Styles Questionnaire: Personality and educational correlates in Belgian high school and college students. European Journal of Personality, 16(1), 43–54. doi:10.1002/per.430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel, T., Bachmann, S., Gerdenitsch, C., & Korunka, C. (2015). The humor-creativity pathway: Experimenting with affect. Poster presentation at the 17th European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology [EAWOP] (Oslo/Norway, 20.–23.05.2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. R. (1994). Effect of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(4), 953–967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. R. (2002). The humour effect: Differential processing and privileged retrieval. Memory, 10(2), 127–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. R., & Williams, A. R. (2001). Memory for humorous cartoons. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz, M. A., & LoSchiavo, F. M. (2006). Bringing life to online instruction with humor. Radical Pedagogy, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy/Bringing_Life_to_Online_Instruction_with_Humor.html.

  • Smith, R. E., Ascough, J. C., Ettinger, R. F., & Nelson, D. A. (1971). Humor, anxiety, and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(2), 243–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, W. D., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (1994). Student perception of teacher humor and classroom climate. Communication Research Reports, 11(1), 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, H., & Heath, L. (2014). Impacts of humor and relevance on the remembering of lecture details. Humor—International Journal of Humor Research, 27(1), 87–101. doi:10.1515/humor-2013-0051.

  • Taylor, C., Zeng, H., Bell, S., & Eskey, M. (2010). Examining the do’s and don’ts of using humor in the online classroom. In TCC Worldwide Online Conference (Vol. 2010, pp. 31–46). Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/43757/.

  • Torok, S. E., McMorris, R. F., & Lin, W.-C. (2004). Is humor an appreciated teaching tool? College Teaching, 52(1), 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzer, M. B., & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., Wojtaszczyk, A. M., & Smith, T. (2006). Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education, 55(2), 178–196. doi:10.1080/03634520600566132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. L., & Cotrell, H. W. (2001). Ten specific techniques for developing humor in the classroom. Education, 108(2), 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2005). Advisor–advisee communication two: The influence of verbal aggression and humor assessment on advisee perceptions of advisor credibility and affective learning. Communication Research Reports, 22(4), 303–313. doi:10.1080/000368105000317599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H. (2015). Humor effects in shame-inducing health issue advertising: The moderating effects of fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television programs as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 170–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A. (1976). Faciliating effects of humor on creativity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 318–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tabea Scheel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheel, T. (2017). Humor and Learning in the Workplace. In: Humor at Work in Teams, Leadership, Negotiations, Learning and Health. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65691-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics