Skip to main content

Eugene Gendlin and the Feel of International Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Emotions in International Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations ((PSIR))

  • 1725 Accesses

Abstract

Despite whatever academics say, international politics is not an intellectual enterprise and to intellectualize it is to misunderstand it. Instead international politics, at its most basic level, is a matter of how we, and the collectivities we have created for ourselves, find ourselves in the world. Finding ourselves in the world is first and foremost a task which our bodies solve. Eugene Gendlin’s phenomenological psychology, and his focus on the “felt sense,” provide ways of investigating the embodied nature of international politics. No one has so far analyzed international politics the way Gendlin’s psychology makes possible. The prospects are exciting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gendlin, 2001, As presented in popular titles such as Gendlin, 2003b; See further “The International Focusing Institute,” n.d.; Gendlin was an occasional lecturer at the Ensalen Institute in Big Sur, California, a leading center for the New Age movement . A personal account is Weisel-Barth, 2008, p. 386.

References

  • Ash, T. G. (2006). Islam in Europe. The New York Review of Books, 53(15), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S., & Hamid, N. (2015, November 16). Paris: The War ISIS Wants. New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birzer, M. L., & Smith-Mahdi, J. (2006). Does Race Matter? The Phenomenology of Discrimination Experienced Among African Americans. Journal of African American Studies, 10(2), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1998, April 7). Statement to the Press on Arriving at Hillsborough Castle for the Northern Ireland Talks, 7 April 1998. In Wikiquote. Retrieved from https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tony_Blair

  • Bleiker, R., & Hutchison, E. (2008). Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics. Review of International Studies, 34(Special Issue), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borger, J. (2003, July 17). The Spies Who Pushed for War. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jul/17/iraq.usa

  • Brown, C. (2013). “Human Nature”, Science and International Political Theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, 16(4), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, N. C. (2000). The Passion of World Politics: Propositions on Emotion and Emotional Relationships. International Security, 24(4), 116–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • d’Orsogna, S. (2000). Eugene Gendlin Introduces Focusing (Vol. 1). Toronto. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7PEC5Mh5FY

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fierke, K. M. (2014). Political Self-Sacrifice: Agency, Body and Emotion in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedland, J. (2016a, June 25). From Brexit to Trump? The New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedland, J. (2016b, July 29). Donald Trump Speaks to the Gut – And Progressives Need to Do the Same. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. (2003). Eugene Gendlin’s Theory and Practice of Psychotherapy: A Personal Account. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 2(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (1986). Body Image and Body Schema: A Conceptual Clarification. Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 7(4), 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1973). A Phenomenology of Emotions: Anger. In D. Carr & E. S. Casey (Eds.), Explorations in Phenomenology (pp. 367–398). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1999-6_18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1978). Heidegger and the Philosophy of Psychology. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(1–3), 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1988). Obituary: Carl Rogers (1902–1987). American Psychologist, 43(2), 127–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1991). On Emotion in Therapy. Emotion, Psychotherapy, and Change, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1992a). The Primacy of the Body, Not the Primacy of Perception. Man and World, 25(3), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1992b). The Wider Role of Bodily Sense in Thought and Language. In M. Sheets-Johnstone (Ed.), Giving the Body Its Due (pp. 192–207). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1995). Crossing and Dipping: Some Terms for Approaching the Interface Between Natural Understanding and Logical Formulation. Minds and Machines, 5(4), 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (2001). Let Your Body Interpret Your Dreams (Later Printing ed.). Wilmette, IL: Chiron Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (2003a). Beyond Postmodernism: From Concepts Through Experiencing. In R. Frie (Ed.), Understanding Experience: Psychotherapy and Postmodernism (pp. 100–115). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (2003b). Focusing: How to Open Up Your Deeper Feelings and Intuition. London: Rider & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (2004). The New Phenomenology of Carrying Forward. Continental Philosophy Review, 37(1), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (2009). We Can Think with the Implicit, as Well as with Fully-Formed Concepts. In After Cognitivism (pp. 147–161). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a Human Science: A Phenomenologically Based Approach. New York: Joanna Cotler Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatab, L. J. (1994). Human Nature in a Postmodern World: Reflections on the Work of Eugene Gendlin. Human Studies, 17(3), 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuman, L. (2011). Focusing: An Interview with Philosopher/Psychologist Eugene Gendlin. Tricycle Magazine, (Fall), 40-46-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E., & Bleiker, R. (2014). Theorizing Emotions in World Politics. International Theory, 6(3), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemi, A. (2005). Carl Rogers and Eugene Gendlin on the Bodily Felt Sense: What They Share and Where They Differ. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies, 4(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • In His Own Words: The Inspiring Speeches of Nelson Mandela. (2013, December 6). Express.co.uk. Retrieved from http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/447158/In-his-own-words-The-inspiring-speeches-of-Nelson-Mandela

  • Jager, B. (1989). Transformation of the Passions: Psychoanalytic and Phenomenological Perspectives. In Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology (pp. 217–231). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology (Vol. 1). New York: H. Holt & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1994). The Physical Basis of Emotion. Psychological Review, 101(2), 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1997). Embodied Meaning and Cognitive Science. In D. M. Levin (Ed.), Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy (pp. 148–175). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2008). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. A. (2012). The Deep Bodily Roots of Emotion. Husserl Studies, 28(3), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, C. G. (1922). The Emotions. In K. Dunlap (Ed.), The Emotions (Vol. 1, pp. 33–92). New York: Williams & Wilkins Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. M. (1994). Making Sense: The Work of Eugene Gendlin. Human Studies, 17(3), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. M. (Ed.). (1997). Language Beyond Postmodernism: Saying and Thinking in Gendlin’s Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. D., & Todd, R. M. (2005). Getting Emotional: A Neural Perspective on Emotion, Intention, and Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–9), 210–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Z. (1949, September 21). The Chinese People Have Stood Up! Retrieved June 24, 2010, from https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-5/mswv5_01.htm

  • Neumann, I. B. (2014). International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium, 43(1), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. (2009). Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D., & Davidson, J. (2009). Hubris Syndrome: An Acquired Personality Disorder? A Study of US Presidents and UK Prime Ministers over the Last 100 Years. Brain, 132(5), 1396–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J., & Watt, D. (2011). What Is Basic About Basic Emotions? Lasting Lessons from Affective Neuroscience. Emotion Review, 3(4), 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. J. (2006). Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2007). The Power of Metaphor: Consent, Dissent & Revolution. In R. C. M. Mole (Ed.), Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2016). How the World Stage Makes Its Subjects: An Embodied Critique of Constructivist IR Theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, 19(1), 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2017a). Heidegger on Willpower and the Mood of Modernity. In A. Cerella & L. Odysseos (Eds.), Heidegger and the Global Age. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringmar, E. (2017b). Outline of a Non-deliberative, Mood-Based, Theory of Action. Philosophia, 78(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. M. (2000). Focusing on the Flesh: Merleau-Ponty, Gendlin, and Lived Subjectivity. Lifwynn Correspondence, 5(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the Categorization of Emotions. Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), 426–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P. (1949). Iron in the Soul. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini, G., & Rosfort, R. (2013). Emotions and Personhood: Exploring Fragility, Making Sense of Vulnerability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suskind, R. (2004, October 17). Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • The International Focusing Institute. (n.d.). Retrieved July 25, 2016, from http://www.focusing.org

  • Weisel-Barth, J. (2008). A Response to Lynn Preston’s Explication of Implicit Experience in the Work of Eugene Gendlin: An Appreciation. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 3(4), 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, F. J. (2009). Phenomenological Currents in Twentieth-Century Psychology. In H. L. Dreyfus & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), A Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism (pp. 394–411). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. (2004). Generation Kill: The True Story of Bravo Company in Iraq – Marines Who Deal in Bullets, Bombs and Ultraviolence. New York: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Ross Crisp, Artie Egendorf and to the editors for comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ringmar, E. (2018). Eugene Gendlin and the Feel of International Politics. In: Clément, M., Sangar, E. (eds) Researching Emotions in International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65575-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics