Abstract
In this chapter, we present recent developments to utilize Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technology in an educational context. As the current workload of a learner is a crucial factor for successful learning and should be held in an optimal range, we aimed at identifying the user’s workload by recording neural signals with electroencephalography (EEG). We describe initial studies that identified potential confounds when utilizing BCIs in such a scenario. Taking into account these results, we could show in a follow-up study that EEG could successfully be used to predict workload in students solving arithmetic exercises with increasing difficulty. Based on the obtained prediction model, we developed a digital learning environment that detects the user’s workload by EEG and automatically adapts the difficulty of the presented exercises to hold the learner’s workload level in an optimal range. Beside estimating workload based on EEG recordings, we also show that different executive functions can be detected and discriminated between based on their neural signatures. These findings could be used for a more specific adaptation of complex learning environments. Based on the existing literature and the results presented in this chapter, we discuss the methodological and theoretical prospects and pitfalls of this approach and outline further possible applications of BCI technology in an educational context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Askew, M. (2015). Numeracy for the 21st century: A commentary. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 707–712.
Berka, C., Levendowski, D. J., Lumicao, M. N., Yau, A., Davis, G., Zivkovic, V. T.,…, Craven, P. L. (2007). EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 78(Supplement 1), B231–B244.
Brouwer, A.-M., Hogervorst, M. A., Van Erp, J. B., Heffelaar, T., Zimmerman, P. H., & Oostenveld, R. (2012). Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task. Journal of Neural Engineering, 9(4), 045008.
Burg, J. P. (1972). The relationship between maximum entropy spectra and maximum likelihood spectra. Geophysics, 37(2), 375–376.
Calder, N. (2015). Student wonderings: Scaffolding student understanding within student-centred inquiry learning. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1121–1131.
Causse, M., Fabre, E., Giraudet, L., Gonzalez, M., & Peysakhovich, V. (2015). EEG/ERP as a measure of mental workload in a simple piloting task. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5230–5236.
Corbett, A. (2001). Cognitive computer tutors: Solving the two-sigma problem. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on User Modeling (pp. 137–147).
Cover, T., & Thomas, J. (2006). Elements of information theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135.
Dowker, A. (2004). What works for children with mathematical difficulties? (Vol. 554). Nottingham: DfES Publications.
Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Chee, A. E. (2010). The components of working memory updating: An experimental decomposition and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36(1), 170.
Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2(2–3), 101–118.
Gerjets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? the role of learner activities and of students conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 445–465.
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Cierniak, G. (2009). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: A research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 43–54.
Gerjets, P., Walter, C., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Zander, T. O. (2014). Cognitive state monitoring and the design of adaptive instruction in digital environments: Lessons learned from cognitive workload assessment using a passive brain-computer interface approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 385.
Gevins, A., Smith, M., McEvoy, L., & Yu, D. (1997, Jun). High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: Effects of task difficulty type of processing, and practice. Cereb Cortex, 7(4), 374–385.
Graesser, A., & McNamara, D. (2010). Self-regulated Learning in Learning Environments with Pedagogical Agents that Interact in Natural Language. Educational Psychologist, 45, 234–244.
Harmony, T., Ferna’ndez, T., Silva, J., Bosch, J., Valde’s, P., Ferna’ndez-Bouzas, A.,…, Rodríguez, D. (1999). Do specific eeg frequencies indicate different processes during mental calculation? Neuroscience Letters, 266(1), 25–28.
Haufe, S., Meinecke, F., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Haynes, J.-D., Blankertz, B., Bießmann, F. (2014). On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 87, 96–110.
Jasper, H. (1958). The 10/20 international electrode system. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371–375.
Jonides, J., Schumacher, E. H., Smith, E. E., Lauber E. J., Awh, E., Minoshima, S., Koeppe, R.A. (1997). Verbal working memory load affects regional brain activation as measured by pet. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(4), 462–475.
Karagiannakis, G. N., & Cooreman, A. (2014). Focused MLD intervention based on the classification of MLD subtypes. In The Routledge International Handbook of Dyscalculia and Mathematical Learning Difficulties (p. 265).
Käser, T., Baschera, G.-M., Busetto, A. G., Klingler, S., Solenthaler, B., Buhmann, J. M., Gross, M. (2013). Towards a framework for modelling engagement dynamics in multiple learning domains. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(1–2), 59–83.
Kirschner, P., & Gerjets, P. (2006). Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 1–8.
Kohlmorgen, J., Dornhege, G., Braun, M., Blankertz, B., Müller K.-R., Curio, G.,…, Kincses, W. E. (2007). Improving human performance in a real operating environment through real-time mental workload detection. In Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing (pp. 409–422). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kong, J., Wang, C., Kwong, K., Vangel, M., Chua, E., & Gollub, R. (2005). The neural substrate of arithmetic operations and procedure complexity. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(3), 397–405.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex frontal lobe tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140.
Murata, A. (2005). An attempt to evaluate mental workload using wavelet transform of EEG. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 47(3), 498–508.
Oken, B., Salinsky M., & Elsas, S. (2006). Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: Physiological basis and measurement. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117(9), 1885–1901.
Richards, K. C., Enderlin, C. A., Beck, C., McSweeney J. C., Jones, T. C., & Rober son, P. K. (2007). Tailored biobehavioral interventions: A literature review and synthesis. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 21(4), 271–285.
Samek, W., Meinecke, F. C., & Müller, K.-R. (2013). Transferring subspaces between subjects in brain-computer interfacing. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 60(8), 2289–2298.
Sanders, A., & Lamers, J. (2002). The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychologica, 109(1), 41–56.
Scharinger, C., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2015a). Pupil dilation and eeg alpha frequency band power reveal load on executive functions for link-selection processes during text reading. PloS One, 10(6), e0130608.
Scharinger, C., Soutschek, A., Schubert, T., & Gerjets, P. (2015b). When flanker meets the n-back: What EEG and pupil dilation data reveal about the interplay between the two central-executive working memory functions inhibition and updating. Psychophysiology, 52(10), 1293–1304.
Scheiter, K., Fillisch, B., Krebs, M.-C., Leber, J., Ploetzner, R., Renkl, A., et al. (2017). How to design adaptive multimedia environments to support self-regulated learning. In Informational Environments: Effects of Use Effective Designs (Chap. 9).
Schlögl, A., Keinrath, C., Zimmermann, D., Scherer R., Leeb, R., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2007). A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(1), 98–104.
Soltanlou, M., Jung, S., Roesch, S., Ninaus, M., Brandelik, K., Heller, J., et al. (2017). Behavioral and neurocognitive evaluation of a web-based learning platform for orthography and arithmetic. In Informational Environments: Effects of Use Effective Designs (Chap. 7).
Spüler, M. (2015). A Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system to use arbitrary Windows applications by directly controlling mouse and keyboard. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 4087–1090).
Spüler, M., Rosenstiel, W., & Bogdan, M. (2012a). Adaptive SVM-based classification increases performance of a MEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (pp. 669–676).
Spüler, M., Rosenstiel, W., & Bogdan, M. (2012b). Principal component based covariate shift adaption to reduce non-stationarity in a MEG-based brain- computer interface. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012(1), 1–7.
Spüler, M., Walter, A., Rosenstiel, W., & Bogdan, M. (2014). Spatial filtering based on canonical correlation analysis for classification of evoked or event- related potentials in EEG data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 22(6), 1097–1103.
Spüler, M., Sarasola-Sanz, A., Birbaumer, N., Rosenstiel, W., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2015). Comparing metrics to evaluate performance of regression methods for decoding of neural signals. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1083–1086).
Spüler, M., Walter, C., Rosenstiel, W., Gerjets, P., Moeller K., & Klein, E. (2016). EEG-based prediction of cognitive workload induced by arithmetic: A step towards online adaptation in numerical learning. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education ZDM, 48(3), 267–278.
Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia. Brain, 123(11), 2240–2255.
Sweller, J., Van Merrinboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Thomas, H. B. G. (1963). Communication theory and the constellation hypothesis of calculation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15(3), 173–191.
Tu, W., & Sun, S. (2012). A subject transfer framework for eeg classification. Neurocomputing, 82, 109–116.
Walter, C., Cierniak, G., Gerjets, P., Rosenstiel, W., & Bogdan, M. (2011). Classifying mental states with machine learning algorithms using alpha activity decline. In European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks
Walter, C., Schmidt, S., Rosenstiel, W., Gerjets, P., & Bogdan, M. (2013). Using cross-task classification for classifying workload levels in complex learning tasks. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 (pp. 876–881).
Walter, C., Wolter, P., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Spüler, M. (2014, 09). Towards cross-subject workload prediction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference, Graz, Austria.
Wang, Z., Hope, R. M., Wang, Z., Ji, Q., & Gray, W. D. (2012). Cross-subject workload classification with a hierarchical bayes model. NeuroImage, 59(1), 64–69.
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002). Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 767–791.
Acknowledgements
This research was financed by the Leibniz ScienceCampus Tübingen “Informational Environments”. It was further supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; grant SP-1533∖2-1) and the LEAD Graduate school at the Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, which is funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German federal government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spüler, M., Krumpe, T., Walter, C., Scharinger, C., Rosenstiel, W., Gerjets, P. (2017). Brain-Computer Interfaces for Educational Applications. In: Buder, J., Hesse, F. (eds) Informational Environments . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64273-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64274-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)