Skip to main content

Informational Environments: Cognitive, Motivational-Affective, and Social-Interactive Forays into the Digital Transformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Informational Environments

Abstract

This chapter deals with the question of how people use digital technologies in order to get a better understanding of the world surrounding them, thus offering a cognitively inspired perspective to the current digital transformation of society. After delineating the importance of information and information processing, we introduce the concept of informational environments as the set of informational resources that a person habitually taps into over a life-course in order to get a better understanding of the world. Implications of this definition are discussed. We also introduce the two main themes of the current book and provide a preview on the subsequent chapters. The first main theme (effects of use) is to provide descriptive accounts of how people currently make use of their informational environments. On the one hand, effects of use depend on cognitive, motivational-affective, and social-interactive characteristics of a person. On the other hand, effects of use depend on the characteristics of the environment (e.g., rules and regulations). The second main theme (effective designs) prescriptively refers to the way that informational resources in an informational environment can be designed to improve learning. It is argued that digital technologies can provide such learning opportunities inasmuch as they engender teacher-like characteristics. Among these are cognitive characteristics (e.g., fostering self-regulation skills), motivational-affective characteristics (e.g., fostering emotion regulation), and social-interactive characteristics (e.g., providing interactive support that is adapted to the current needs of a learner).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, S. (2008). How do animations influence learning? In D. H. Robinson & G. J. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning(pp. 37–67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleven, V., Mclaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19, 105–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, R., Millar, G. C., Taub, M., Mudrick, N. V., Bradbury, A. E., & Price, M. J. (2017). Using data visualizations to foster emotion regulation during self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 225–247). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). The self in social contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 297–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomé, T., & Bromme, R. (2009). Coherence formation when learning from text and pictures: What kind of support for whom? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 282–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buder, J. (2017). A conceptual framework of knowledge exchange. In S. Schwan & U. Cress (Eds.), The psychology of digital learning: Constructing, exchanging, and acquiring knowledge with digital media (pp. 105–122). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buder, J., Buttliere, B., & Cress, U. (2017). The role of cognitive conflicts in informational environments: Conflicting evidence from the learning sciences and social psychology? In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 53–74). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buder, J., & Hesse, F. W. (2016). Designing digital technologies for deeper learning. In M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buder, J., & Schwind, C. (2012). Learning with personalized recommender systems: A psychological view. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E., & Voogel, A. (1985). Transfer of training principles for instructional design. ECTJ, 33, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., & Jeong, H. (Eds.). (2016). Mass collaboration and education (Vol. 16). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello, S. (2013). A selective meta-analysis on the relative incidence of discrete affective states during learning with technology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1082–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dscout (2016, June 15). Mobile touches: dscout’s inaugural study on humans and their tech. Retrieved from https://blog.dscout.com/mobile-touches

  • Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 949–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (2000). Lifelong learning—More than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W.-T., & Pirolli, P. (2007). SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the World Wide Web. Human-Computer Interaction, 22, 355–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Lippert, A. M., & Hampton, A. J. (2017). Successes and failures in building learning environments to promote deep learning: The value of conversational agents. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 273–298). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hillmert, S., Groß, M., Schmidt-Hertha, B., & Weber, H. (2017). Informational environments and college student dropout. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 27–52). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höller, J., Tsiatsis, V., Mulligan, C., Karnouskos, S., Avesand, S., & Boyle, D. (2014). From machine-to-machine to the Internet of things: Introduction to a new age of intelligence. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2005). Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerle, J., Bientzle, M., Cress, U., Flemming, D., Greving, H., Grapendorf, J., … Sassenberg, K. (2017). Motivated processing of health-related information in online environments. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 75–96). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–78). Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts—A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, J. (2016). Machines of loving grace: The quest for common ground between humans and robots. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., Pluchino, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015). Eye-movement modeling of integrative reading of an illustrated text: Effects on processing and learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. (1982). Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W. (1963). Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1983). Informavores. In F. Machlup & U. Mansfield (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 111–113). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, A. (2005). An attempt to evaluate mental workload using wavelet transform of EEG. Human Factors, 47, 498–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 703–732). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass, J. L., O’Keefe, P. A., Homer, B. D., Case, J., Hayward, E. O., Stein, M., & Perlin, K. (2013). The impact of individual, competitive, and collaborative mathematics game play on learning, performance, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 1050–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores—And teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33, 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, R. D ., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutor's explanations and questions. Review of Education Research, 77, 534–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, K., Fillisch, B., Krebs, M.-C., Leber, J., Plötzer, R., Renkl, A., … Zimmermann, G. (2017). How to design adaptive multimedia environments to support self-regulated learning. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 203–223). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1961). Why we need teaching machines. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 377–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltanlou, M., Jung, S., Roesch, S., Ninaus, M., Brandelik, K., Heller, J., … Moeller, K. (2017). Behavioral and neurocognitive evaluation of a web-platform for game-based learning of orthography and numeracy. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 149–176). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., Thota, J. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (2003). Cognitive flexibility theory: Hypermedia for complex learning, adaptive knowledge application, and experience acceleration. Educational Technology, 43, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spüler, M., Krumpe, T., Walter, C., Scharinger, C., Rosenstiel, W., & Gerjets, P. (2017). Brain-computer interfaces for educational applications. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 177–201). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T., Goeze, A., Marx, C., Hoehne, V., Klotz, V., & Schrader, J. (2017). Using digital media to assess and promote school and adult education teacher competence. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 125–148). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werquin, P. (2010, February). Recognition of non-formal and informal learning: Country practices. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., Rakovic, M., Marzouk, Z., Pakdaman-Savoji, A., … Nesbit, H. C. (2017). Designs for learning analytics to support information problem solving. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 249–272). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witzany, G. (Ed.). (2014). Biocommunication of animals. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zurstiege, G., Zipfel, S., Ort, A., Mack, I., Meitz, T. G. K., & Schäffeler, N. (2017). Managing obesity prevention using digital media—A double-sided approach. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 97–123). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Buder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buder, J., Hesse, F.W. (2017). Informational Environments: Cognitive, Motivational-Affective, and Social-Interactive Forays into the Digital Transformation. In: Buder, J., Hesse, F. (eds) Informational Environments . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics