Skip to main content

Everyday Arts for Special Education: Impact on Student Learning and Teacher Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arts Evaluation and Assessment
  • 789 Accesses

Abstract

Everyday Arts for Special Education was a five-year program providing professional development and instruction in the arts in ten, New York City, special education elementary schools, funded through a US Department of Education i3 grant. The program served 300 teachers and 5334 special education students. The impact of the program on reading achievement and social-emotional learning was investigated through a quasi-experimental design, using the New York State Alternative Assessment and the Student Annual Needs Determination Inventory. A mixed-method study included weekly student assessment by participating teachers, structured observations, surveys, and interviews. The program was determined to have an effect on reading scores, social-emotional learning, communication and socialization skills, and teachers’ ability to implement arts-based teaching methods for students with varied disabilities.

This research was supported by US Department of Education i3 Grant U396C100275 awarded to District 75, New York City Department of Education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    District 75’s arts partner was MNMP for the first two years of the grant. MNMP was absorbed by UAP, which then became District 75’s partner for the final three years.

  2. 2.

    Because students were rated on a 3-point scale, mean scores could range from 1 to 3.

References

  • Cahill, K., Silva, R., & Chappell, D. A. (2012). SANDI training manual. Riverside, CA: Riverside County Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, R., & Horowitz, A. (2016, October). Demonstration of a hierarchical survey platform for program evaluation and student assessment. Demonstration presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Education Department, Office of State Assessment. (2010). New York State Alternative Assessment: Administration manual 2010–11, pp. 1–31. Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riverside County Office of Education, Special Education Unit. (2008). Student annual needs determination inventory (3rd ed.). Riverside, CA: Riverside County Office of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and Standards Handbook: Version 3.0. (2014). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horowitz, R. (2018). Everyday Arts for Special Education: Impact on Student Learning and Teacher Development. In: Rajan, R., O'Neal, I. (eds) Arts Evaluation and Assessment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64116-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64116-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64115-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64116-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics