Skip to main content

An Introduction to Arts Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arts Evaluation and Assessment

Abstract

Program evaluation is a relatively new field of study, both for its discipline-specific value and broader purpose. In this chapter, we discuss the development of evaluation as a necessary component of organizational development and grant writing, and expound these ideas to the arts. Since funding for arts programming is generally smaller than other fields, there are additional challenges for arts evaluators to consider when choosing appropriate models for data collection and analysis. Finally, we discuss the current trends in evaluating the arts, the challenges faced by organizations of all sizes, and introduce the varied and unique contributions to this edited collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bresler, L. (Ed.). (2007). International handbook of research in arts education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. M., Horowitz, R., & Abeles, H. (2000). Learning in and through the arts: The question of transfer. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 228–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chand O’Neal, I. (2014). Selected findings from the John F. Kennedy Center’s Arts in Education Research Study: An impact evaluation of arts-integrated instruction through the Changing Education Through the Arts (CETA) program. Washington, DC: The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand O’Neal, I., Paek, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Comparison of competing theories about ideation and creativity. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 2(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0018

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand O’Neal, I., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Uncover & unleash students’ creative potential: Translating research into practice. Principal, National Association of Elementary School Principals and Crayola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (2009, February 24). In tough times, the humanities must justify their worth. The New York Times, p. C1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Fiscal Year 2012 Congressional Action. 2013. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget12/12action.pdf

  • Eisner, E. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in education and the arts. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E. (Ed.). (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership and President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. S. (2012a). Integrating the performing arts in grades K-5. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. S. (2012b). Who needs the arts? Focus on teacher education. ACEI, 11(4), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. S. (2015). Artistic assessment: Strategies for documenting learning in the arts. Journal of the Grant Professionals Association, 13(1), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. S., & Tomal, D. (2015). Grant writing: Practical strategies for scholars and professionals. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives on curriculum evaluation. AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation, No. 1 (pp. 39–83). Rand McNAlly: Skokie, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Years of Arts Integration. (2012). Retrieved November 1, 2013, from http://www.ed.gov/oii-news/ten-years-arts-integration

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rajan, R.S., O’Neal, I.C. (2018). An Introduction to Arts Evaluation. In: Rajan, R., O'Neal, I. (eds) Arts Evaluation and Assessment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64116-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64116-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64115-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64116-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics