Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Systematic Approach to Adopt Sustainability and Efficiency Practices in Energy-Intensive Industries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

The foundry industry is counted among the energy- and resource-intensive industries, and thus an important contributor to impacts on climate change. On a global level, the production of casting parts is expected to increase, with China, USA and India as the main cast producers, and the automotive sector as the main purchaser. While the production of castings is one of the oldest production processes in human history, there are still weaknesses regarding sustainable operations, amongst others due to the asset intensity and different energy cost situations on global level. Political and legislative actions were taken to force sustainable practices in Europe, which means a challenge and a responsibility for foundries at the same time, to adapt their processes, and to adopt sustainability and efficiency management. This paper describes a systematic model approach combining a synthesis of top-down and bottom-up analyses and establishing sustainable practices in foundries. The approach follows the Plan–Do–Check–Act cycle and allows to identify and capture energy and resource efficiency potential while considering life cycle aspects within a highly specific and complex industry. The paper also highlights the importance of transdisciplinary collaboration regarding the realization of sector-specific energy efficiency and integrated into value chain networks. The benefit of the approach is its application on different sustainability maturity levels, and its potential to be adopted in different energy- and resource-intensive industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aurich, J. C., Lauer, C., Faltin, M., & Schweitzer, E. (2009). Abschätzung der Lebenszykluskosten neu entwickelter Fertigungsprozesse. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 104(9), 720–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austrian Standards Institute. (2006). EN ISO 14040. In Environmental management-life cycle assessment-principles and framework (ISO 14040:2006) (p. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Foundry Association. (2003). Guide to energy efficiency opportunities in Canadian foundries. Joint project of the Canadian Industry Program for Energy Conservation (CIPEC). http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/oee/pdf/cipec/ieep/newscentre/foundry/Foundry_eng.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2016.

  • Chai, K. H., & Yeo, C. (2012). Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach: A conceptual framework. Energy Policy, 46, 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coss, S., Topic, M., Tschiggerl, K., & Raupenstrauch, H. (2015). Development and application of a modular-based, multi-level approach for increasing energy efficiency. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 1, 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2012). Practical application of improving energy efficiency in foundries. Johannesburg: Brics Foundry Forum 2012. http://de.slideshare.net/NFTN/practical-applications-of-improving-energy-efficiency-in-foundries. Accessed November 11, 2016.

  • Düspohl, M., Frank, S., Tuck-Fatt, S., & Döll, P. (2012). Transdisciplinar research for supporting environmental management. In: R. Seppelt, A.A. Voinov, S. Lange, D. Bankamp (Eds.), International environmental modelling and software society (iEMSs) 2012 international congress on environmental modelling and software managing resources of a limited planet: Pathways and visions under uncertainty (pp 1952–1959). Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eronen, S., Tapola, M., Svensson, E., Sommarin, P., Helber, J., Piatek, J., Przybylski, J., Caballero, P., & Kemppainen, P. (2013). Improving the energy efficiency of foundries in Europe. Final report of the IEE project IEE/07/585/SI2.500402 Foundrybench: Foundry Energy Efficiency Benchmarking. http://ax-fibin.aldone.fi/@Bin/7cf59cc87fffb7e3e9fe5aa5768a7325/1415364723/application/pdf/41984/Foundrybench_Resultoriented%20final%20report.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2015.

  • European Commission. (2005). Reference document on best available techniques in smitheries and foundries (pp. 13–14). Sevilla: Europ IPPC Bureau at the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T. E., & Allenby, B. R. (1995). Industrial ecology (p. 9). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helber, J., & Steinhäuser, M. (2011). Good practice guide on energy saving potentials and opportunities for foundries. Foundrybench D19. Düsseldorf. http://www.swerea.se/Global/Swerea_SWECAST/Foundrybench/Foundrybench%20D19%20Good%20practice%20guide.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2015.

  • Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: Barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 3,(4), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1994). The energy efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, T., Bergmann, M., & Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics, 79, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jochem, E. (2003). Energie rationeller nutzen: Zwischen Wissen und Handeln. Gaia, 12(1), 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knothe, W. (2013). Strategien und Maßnahmen zur Energie-Effizienz im Fertigungsprozess einer Eisengiesserei. Giesserei Rundschau, 60(5/6), 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. A. (2005). Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics, 53, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J. (1992). Auf dem Weg zu Transdisziplinarität. Gaia, 1(5), 250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posch, W. (2011). Ganzheitliches Energiemanagement für Industriebetriebe. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rohdin, P., Thollander, P., & Solding, P. (2007). Barriers to and driver for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry. Energy Policy, 35(1), 672–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, M., Abele, E., Eisele, C., & Rummel, W. (2010). Analyse von Leistungsmessungen. Ein Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Energieeffizienz von Werkzeugmaschinen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 105(10), 876–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., & Hansen, E. G. (2013). Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: Mapping the field. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(4), 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, C. (2004). Energieeffizienz in Unternehmen. Eine wissensbasierte Analyse von Einflussfaktoren und Instrumenten. Zurich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, S., O’Mally, E., Schleich, J., & Scott, S. (2004). The economics of energy efficiency. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, D. (2014). Transdisciplinary energy research: Reflecting the context. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thollander, P., & Ottosson, M. (2008). An energy efficient Swedish pulp and paper industry: Exploring barriers to and driving forces for cost-effective energy efficiency investments. Energy Efficiency, 1(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Thollander, P., & Backlund, S. (2013). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency in foundries: A European comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschiggerl, K., Topic, M., Doschek, K., Rauter, M., Biedermann, H., & Raupenstrauch, H. (2016). Foundry products and their value added in life cycle considerations. Giesserei Rundschau, 62(7/8), 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschiggerl, K., & Wolf, P. (2012). Innovative CP networks: The case of the ÖKOPROFIT® network promoting innovative clean production solutions for 20 years. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 14(6), 1029–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2015). The global casting industry. Giesserei-Praxis, 2015(1–2), 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015a). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Proposal by the President. Draft decision-/CP.21. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2016.

  • United Nations. (2015b). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on September 25, 2015. 70/1. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed October 27.

  • Von Gleich, A. (2008). Ausblick. In A. Von Gleich & S. Gössling-Reisemann (Eds.), Industrial ecology: Erfolgreiche Wege zu nachhaltigen industriellen Systemen (pp. 366–375). Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1994). Preface. In B. R. Allenby & D. J. Richards (Eds.), The greening of industrial ecosystems (Vol. 211, p. V). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Association of the Austrian Foundry Industry and partnering foundries for supporting the project “EnEffGiess”. The project was funded by the Austrian Foundry Industry and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency, and conducted under the “Collective Research” program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chair of Economics- and Business Management, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Peter-Tunner-Strasse 25-27, 8700, Leoben, Austria

    Karin Tschiggerl & Milan Topić

Authors
  1. Karin Tschiggerl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Milan Topić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Tschiggerl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, HAW Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tschiggerl, K., Topić, M. (2018). A Systematic Approach to Adopt Sustainability and Efficiency Practices in Energy-Intensive Industries. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation