Skip to main content

A Critical Review of the Role of Indicators in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) bring together environmental, social and economic concerns. They therefore have the potential to move society away from the dominant model of prosperity as purely economic toward a more holistic and ‘sustainable’ prosperity. But, the success of such a transformative agenda rests on its implementation. At the heart of planned implementation of the SDGs is a set of 230 indicators. Indicators have been strongly critiqued in a range of literatures. However, in the context of the SDGs, indicators have been described as ‘essential’ with little critical assessment of their role in implementation. Therefore, this chapter aims to provide this critical voice. To do this, the chapter reviews critiques of indicators from sustainability science, anthropology and sociology and provides illustrative cases of indicators implementation. From this review we are able to draw lessons for the use of indicators in SDG implementation. Specifically, the chapter argues that indicators are reductionist and struggle with contested concepts. Nevertheless, by making the operationalisation of concepts visible and enabling quantified analysis, indicators can have a useful role in SDG implementation. However, this requires that indicator critiques are taken seriously and inform indicator use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, A. (2014). Alternative economic indicators?. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, H., Freeman, A., & Higgs, P. (2013). A dynamic mapping of the UK’S creative industries (p. 79). London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2008). Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable? (p. 251). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, B., Sehnbruch, K., Piasna, A., & Agloni, N. (2014). The quality of employment and decent work: Definitions, methodologies, and ongoing debates. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(2), 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2016). Understanding the value of arts & culture. Swindon: Arts & Humanities Research Council. http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/documents/publications/cultural-value-project-final-report/. Accessed: 11/10/2016.

  • Davis, K., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. (2015). The local-global life of indicators: Law, power, and resistance. In S. Merry, K. Davis, & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The quiet power of indicators: Measuring governance, corruption, and rule of law (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCMS. (2014). Culture, sport and wellbeing: An analysis of the taking part survey. London: Department for Culture Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCMS. (2015). Taking part 2015/16 quarter 2. London: Department for Culture Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR. (1999). A better quality of life: The UK sustainable development strategy. London: Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, N. (2015). Tradeoffs in accountability: Conditionality processes in the European Union and Millennium Challenge Corporation. In S. Merry, K. Davis, & B. Kingsbury (Eds.), The quiet power of indicators: Measuring governance, corruption and the rule of law (pp. 156–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2015). Sustainable development in the European Union: 2015 monitoring report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Luxembourg: Eurostat Statistical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnerty, J. (2005). Social indicators: Pitfalls and promise. In P. Herrman (Ed.), Utopia between corrupted public responsibility and contested modernisation: Globalization and social responsibility (pp. 61–76). Hauppauge: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, E., Dougill, A., Mabee, W., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredericks, S. (2014). Measuring and evaluating sustainability: Ethics in sustainability indexes. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., & MacNaughton, G. (2016). A human rights lens on full employment and decent work in the 2030 sustainable development agenda. SAGE Open, 6(2), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2016). Decent work: International Labour Organisation. http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang–en/index.htm. Accessed 01/08/2016.

  • Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth—Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (p. 336). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R. (1968). Remarks at the University of Kansas. http://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/Ready-Reference/RFK-Speeches/Remarks-of-Robert-F-Kennedy-at-the-University-of-Kansas-March-18-1968.aspx. Accessed 02/08/2016.

  • Lofts, H., & Macrory, I. (2015). Sustainable development indicators: July 2015. Office of National Statistics, UK. http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/sustainabledevelopmentindicators/2015-07-13. Accessed 29/07/2016.

  • Mair, S., Druckman, A., & Jackson, T. (2016). Global inequities and emissions in Western European textile and clothing consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 57–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, U. (2009). MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis, 70(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information systems for sustainable development: A report to the Balaton Group (p. 95). Hartland Four Corners: The Sustainability Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. (2011). Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology, 52(3), S83–S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., & Mary, M. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. Morgan & M. Mary (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 10–37). UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2016). Measuring the success of sustainable development indices in terms of reporting by the global press. Social Indicators Research, 125, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2003). Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K., O’Brien, D., & Lee, D. (2013). Happy now? Well-being and cultural policy. Philosophy & Public Policy Quarterly, 31(2), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (p. 310). Chichester: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaford, C. (2013). The multiple uses of subjective well-being indicators. Social Indicators Research, 114(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (p. 982). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M., & Eijsackers, H. (2007). Ecological indicators: Between the two fires of science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 7(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). UN millennium goals, about the MDGs. http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/goals/. Accessed: 16/09/2016.

  • UN. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld. Accessed 09/06/2016.

  • Victor, P. A. (2007). Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster (p. 272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, B. (2012). Towards a balanced scorecard: A critical analysis of the Culture and Sport Evidence (CASE) programme. Cultural trends, 21(4), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (2016). Sustainable development goals. http://www.wwf.org.uk/what_we_do/making_the_links/sustainable_development_goals/. Accessed: 23/07/2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was completed as part of the ESRC Research Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity, Grant Number ES/M010163/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Mair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mair, S., Jones, A., Ward, J., Christie, I., Druckman, A., Lyon, F. (2018). A Critical Review of the Role of Indicators in Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63007-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics