Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in Gastroenterology

Part of the book series: Clinical Gastroenterology ((CG))

Abstract

Since the last edition of this book, several significant advances have been made in the instruments used for endoscopy. This chapter is a brief review of some fundamental improvements that have occurred over the last 5–10 years. It specifically emphasizes those innovations that pertain to the esophagogastroduodenoscope and the colonoscope. Advances in specialty instruments such as endoscopic ultrasound equipment, duodenoscopes, and enteroscopes are not covered in this chapter so that the focus on broad-based improvements in endoscopes can be maintained. All major endoscope manufacturers that supply gastrointestinal endoscopes for the United States were contacted and asked if they would like to contribute a list of innovations that they have incorporated into their endoscopes in the last 5–10 years. The information provided by those companies is included in this chapter along with other notable innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saito Y, Kimura H. Responsive insertion technology. Dig Endosc. 2011;23(Suppl 1):164–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, et al. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2000;46(6):801–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshikawa I, Honda H, Nagata K, et al. Variable stiffness colonoscopes are associated with less pain during colonoscopy in unsedated patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(12):3052–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55(2):172–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuesta R, Sola-Vera J, Uceda F, et al. Does “responsive insertion technology” improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(3):355–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prieto-de-Frias C, Munoz-Navas M, Carretero C, et al. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2013;105(4):208–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haycock A. Magnetic Endoscopic Imaging. Up to date 2013. Accessed 18 Sept 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, et al. Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9243):1718–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung HY, Chung CC, Kwok SY, et al. Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2006;38(3):214–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan C, Repici A, Zullo A, et al. New paradigms for colonoscopic management of diminutive colorectal polyps: predict, resect, and discard or do not resect? Clin Endosc. 2013;46(2):130–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z, et al. Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:353–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Halpern Z, Gross SA, Gralnek IM, et al. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study. Endoscopy. 2015;47(4):238–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(4):431–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Affronti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Affronti, J., Lake, A. (2018). Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. In: Sridhar, S., Wu, G. (eds) Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in Gastroenterology. Clinical Gastroenterology. Humana Press, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62993-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62993-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62991-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62993-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics