Skip to main content

Volatile Interregionalism: The Case of South Atlantic Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 15))

Abstract

In their extra-regional outreach Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa rarely make each other a priority. However, since the end of the Cold War there has been an increasing amount of political efforts to strengthen ties on a region-to-region basis. This chapter argues that this rapprochement has been facilitated by the emergence of two regional projects following a similar logic in a post-Cold War context, in particular the Southern African Development Community and the Common Market of the Southern Cone. At the same time, both projects face serious limitations of actorness that are illustrative of the confined space for interregionalism across the South Atlantic. An analysis of the formalised initiatives on political, economic and trade issues between the two regions concludes that these are characterised by transregional and partly pure forms of interregionalism and that most initiatives are heavily shaped by the leading role of Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See http://www.mercosur.int/innovaportal/v/762/1/secretaria/acceso_autoridades_gestor (retrieved on 07.01.2015) for a complete overview.

  2. 2.

    External funding still represented over 50% of the SADC budget in 2009/10 (SADC 2009).

  3. 3.

    Cf. http://es.socialmercosul.org/cupula-social/ (retrieved on 02.02.2015).

  4. 4.

    Aggarwal and Fogarty (2004) also point to transnational production networks and the transnational activities of non-governmental organisations and civil society actors in that context.

  5. 5.

    The Community of Portuguese Language Countries also falls in this category but due to Brazil being the only South American member and not representing its region within this organisation, it will not be covered in this paper.

  6. 6.

    A similar initiative has been launched in 2005 by Brazil to bring together South American and Arab States under the Spanish acronym ASPA (South America-Arab States Summit), cf. Ayuso et al. in this volume.

  7. 7.

    Cf. http://asasummit.itamaraty.gov.br/asa-ingles/summit-of-south-american-africa (retrieved on 18.04.2015).

  8. 8.

    Cf. http://www.au.int/en/asa (retrieved on 18.04.2015).

References

  • Aggarwal, V. K., & Fogarty, E. A. (Eds.). (2004). EU trade strategies: Between regionalism and globalization. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, C., & Vieira, M. (2005). The new diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1077–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & Söderbaum, F. (2014). Introduction: Intersecting interregionalism. In F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzozero, L. (2011). Los primeros veinte años del MERCOSUR: Del Programa de Liberación Comercial al Plan Estratégico de Acción Social. Densidades (6), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Ministry of External Relations. (2008). Brazilian Foreign Policy Handbook. Brasilia: Alexandre de Gusmao Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, G., Vázquez, M., & Ventura, D. (2009). Reforma institucional del MERCOSUR: Análisis de un reto. In G. Caetano (Ed.), La reforma institucional del MERCOSUR: Del diagnóstico a las propuestas (pp. 21–76). Montevideo: CEFIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason, J. (2011). The political economy of integration: The experience of Mercosur. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2011). The European union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, A. (1999). Globalisation and regionalism in the South in the 21st century. In G. Mills & C. Mutschler (Eds.), Exploring South-South dialogue: Mercosur in Latin America and SADC in Southern Africa (pp. 15–21). Johannesburg: SAIIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2008). Regionalism in world politics: Past and present. In A. Kösler (Ed.), Elements of regional integration: A multidimensional approach (pp. 15–28). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioramonti, L. (Ed.). (2012). Regions and crises: New challenges for contemporary regionalisms (International political economy series). Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamba-Stonehouse, V. (1989). Strategy in the Southern Oceans: A South American View. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, G. L. (2012). Latin America in the 21st century. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de Venezuela – Ministerio del Poder Popular para la Comunicación y la Información. (2010). II Cumbre América del Sur – África – ASA 2009 (Colección Cuadernos para el debate). Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsäter, A., & Söderbaum, F. (2010). Civil society in regional governance in Eastern and Southern Africa. In D. Armstrong, V. Bello, J. Gilson, & D. Spini (Eds.), Civil society and international governance: The role of non-state actors in the EU, Africa, Asia and Middle East (pp. 148–165). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H. (2006). Interregionalism as a multifaceted phenomenon: In search of a typology. In H. Hänggi, R. Roloff, & J. Rüland (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations (pp. 31–62). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentz, J. J. (2005). South Africa and the logic of regional cooperation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B. (1999). Globalization and the new regionalism: The second great transformation. In B. Hettne (Ed.), Globalism and the new regionalism (pp. 1–24). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B. (2003). The new regionalism revisited. In F. Söderbaum & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism: A Palgrave reader (pp. 22–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B. (2006). Beyond the “new” regionalism. In A. Payne (Ed.), Key debates in new political economy (pp. 128–160). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, D. M. (2010). La política exterior de Raúl Alfonsín (1983–1989): Un balance aproximativo. Temas de historia argentina y americana (17), 99–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (2005). A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadiagala, G. M. (2001). Foreign policy decisionmaking in Southern Africa’s fading frontline. In G. M. Khadiagala & T. Lyons (Eds.), African foreign policies: Power and process (pp. 131–158). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechini, G. (2006). Argentina y África en el espejo de Brasil: ¿política por impulsos o construcción de una política exterior? Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechini, G. (2007). Middle powers: IBSA and the new South-South cooperation. NACLA Report on the Americas, 40(5), 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, T. (2013). EU normative power and regionalism: Ideational diffusion and its limits. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattheis, F. (2014). New regionalism in the South – Mercosur and SADC in a comparative and interregional perspective. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERCOSUR. (1991). Tratado de Ascunción para la Constitución de un Mercado Común.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, L. (2002). Community of insecurity: SADC’s struggle for peace and security in Southern Africa. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutenko, L. (2006). MERCOSUR y los países de Asia y de África: Nueva etapa de interacción. Iberoamérica (Trimestral desde Moscú) (3), 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosthuizen, G. (2006). The Southern African development community: The organisation, its policies and prospects. Midrand: Institute for Global Dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponjaert, F. (2013). Interregionalism as a coherent and intelligible instrument in the EU foreign Policy toolbox. In M. Telò & F. Ponjaert (Eds.), The EU’s foreign policy: What kind of power and diplomatic action? (pp. 135–158). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (Eds.). (2012). The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. (2004). Reflections on approaching an FTA negotiation with Mercosur: A review of key issues (SAIIA Trade Policy Report 6). Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J. (2014). Interregionalism and international relations: Reanimating an obsolescent research Agenda? In F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting interregionalism: Regions, global governance and the EU (pp. 15–35). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • SADC Summit of Heads of State and Government. (2003, August 26). Communiqué of the Summit of Heads of State and Government, Dar Es Salaam. http://www.sadc.int/files/3913/5292/8384/SADC_SUMMIT_COMMUNIQUES_1980-2006.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2017.

  • SADC. (2009). Activity report of the SADC secreteriat: For the period August 2007–July 2008. Gaborone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, A. (2012). New regionalism and civil society: Bridging the democratic gap? In P. Riggirozzi & D. Tussie (Eds.), The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America (pp. 147–166). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. (2004). The political economy of regionalism: The case of Southern Africa. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., Stalgren, P., & van Langenhove, L. (2005). The EU as a global actor and the dynamics of interregionalism: A comparative analysis. Journal of European Integration, 27(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standaert, S., & Rayp, G. (2012). Regional integration agreements and rent-seeking in Africa (Working paper series 773). Gent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulchin, J. S. (1987). The Malvinas War of 1982: An inevitable conflict that never should have occurred. Latin American Research Review, 22(3), 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1986). Declaration of a zone of peace and co-operation in the South Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten, J. M., & Ribeiro Hoffmann, A. (2010). Explaining the enforcement of democracy by regional organizations: Comparing EU, Mercosur and SADC. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3), 737–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Klaveren, A. (2000). Chile: The search for open regionalism. In B. Hettne (Ed.), National perspectives on the new regionalism in the south (pp. 132–156). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Nieuwkerk, A. (2010). SADC’s common foreign policy. In C. Harvey & A. van Nieuwkerk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 FOPRISA annual conference (pp. 97–112). Gaborone: Lightbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (2003). Driving SACU – Mercosur: Trans-Atlantic co-operation in the automotive industry (SAIIA Reports 34). Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Mattheis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mattheis, F. (2018). Volatile Interregionalism: The Case of South Atlantic Relations. In: Mattheis, F., Litsegård, A. (eds) Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62908-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics