Skip to main content

Citizen-Sourcing for Public Policy Making: Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics

Part of the book series: Public Administration and Information Technology ((PAIT,volume 25))

Abstract

The public sector, motivated by multiple success stories of the ‘crowd-sourcing’ in the private sector, and also by the increasing complexity of social problems and needs, has started moving in this direction as well, and this gives rise to the gradual development of the ‘citizen-sourcing’. It is important to develop appropriate policy informatics for this purpose, and in particular theoretically sound effective ICT-based citizen-sourcing methods, which enable the efficient retrieval of policy-relevant information, knowledge and ideas from citizens, and then the advanced processing of them in order to calculate useful policy analytics, which can provide substantial support for public policy making. This chapter initially provides an overview of the research that has been conducted in this area by the research group of the author in the last decade, as part of several European projects, concerning the application in the public sector of crowd-sourcing ideas and the development of ICT-based methods for this purpose. We present briefly four such ICT-based methods that we have developed for the ‘active’ as well the ‘passive’ citizen-sourcing, initially aiming at the general public and latter focusing on the experts. Then leveraging the experience gained from the development and some first pilot applications of these methods we propose some theoretical foundations from previous political and management sciences research, which can be used for the future development of effective ICT-based citizen-sourcing methods for supporting public policy making, as well as for their evaluation. Next, based on them an evaluation framework is developed for the multi-perspective evaluation of such methods. Finally, an outline of the evaluations of these ICT-based citizen-sourcing methods is provided, based on parts of this evaluation framework, as well as a comparison of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

DOI:

Diffusion of Innovation

ICT:

Information and Communication Technologies

TAM:

Technology Acceptance Model

References

  • Agafonovas A, Alonderiene R (2013) Value creation in innovations crowdsourcing - example of creative agencies. Organ Mark Emerg Econ 4(1):72–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Androutsopoulou A, Charalabidis Y, Loukis E (2015) Using social media monitoring for public policy making – an evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 9th Mediterranean conference on information systems (MCIS 2015), Samos, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2008) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases. Convergence 14(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2012) Crowdsourcing: a model for leveraging online communities. In: Delwiche A, Henderson J (eds) The Routledge handbook of participative cultures. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2013) Crowdsourcing. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Camisón C, Forés B (2010) Knowledge absorptive capacity: new insights for its conceptualization and measurement. J Bus Res 63(7):707–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalabidis Υ, Loukis E, Androutsopoulou A (2014a) Fostering social innovation through multiple social media. Inf Syst Manag 31:225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalabidis Υ, Loukis E, Koulizakis Y, Mekkaoui D, Ramfos A (2014b) Leveraging European Union policy community through advanced exploitation of social media. In: Proceedings of IFIP sixth international conference on e-Participation - ePart 2014, Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003a) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003b) The era of open innovation. Sloan Manag Rev 44(3):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open innovation: researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99(397):569–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin J (2003) Dialog mapping: reflections on an industrial strength case study. In: Kirschner P, Buckingham Shum P, Carr C (eds) Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin J, Begeman M (1989) gIBIS: a tool for all reasons. J Am Soc Inf Sci 40(3):200–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella A, Bonina CM (2012) A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms. Gov Inf Q 29:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro E, Loukis E, Charalabidis Y, Osella M (2013) Policy making 2.0: from theory to practice. Gov Inf Q 30(4):359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger D, Seedorf S, Schulze T, Nickerson RC, Schader M (2011) Managing the crowd: towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. In: Proceedings of American conference on information systems (AMCIS), 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilens M, Page BI (2014) Testing theories of American politics: elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspect Polit 12(3):564–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2008) Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3(2):101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetmank L (2013) Components and functions of crowdsourcing systems – a systematic literature review. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2013 conference proceedings, Lipsia, Alemania

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgers D, Ihl C (2010) Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int J Public Participation 4(1):67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6). Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html

  • Howe J (2008) Crowdsourcing, why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao CH, Yang C (2011) The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. Int J Inf Manag 31(2):128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huizingh KRE (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain R (2010) Investigation of governance mechanisms for crowdsourcing initiatives. In: Proceedings of American conference on information systems (AMCIS), 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz W, Rittel H (1972) Information science: on the structure of its problems. Inf Storage Retr 8(2):95–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz W, Rittel H (1979) Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper No. 131, University of California, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukis E, Wimmer M (2010) Analyzing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation. In: 4th international conference on online deliberation (OD), Leeds, UK, June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Loukis M, Wimmer A (2012) Multi-method evaluation of different models of structured electronic consultation on government policies. Inf Syst Manag 29(4):284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukis E, Spinellis D, Katsigiannis A (2011) Barriers to the adoption of B2B e-marketplaces by large enterprises: lessons learnt from the Hellenic Aerospace Industry. Inf Syst Manag 28(2):130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukis E Charalabidis Υ, Androutsopoulou A (2015) Evaluating a passive social media citizensourcing innovation. In: Proceedings of IFIP eGovernment conference EGOV2015, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukensmeyer CJ, Torres LH (2008) Citizensourcing: citizen participation in a networked nation. In: Yang K, Bergrud E (eds) Civic engagement in a network society. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, pp 207–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Towards an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J Strateg Inf Syst 22(4):257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marangunić N, Granić A (2015) Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc 14(1):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergel I, Desouza KC (2013) Implementing open innovation in the public sector: the case of Challenge.gov. Public Adm Rev 73(6):882–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam T (2012) Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0. Gov Inf Q 29:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prpić J, Taeihagh A, Melton J (2015) The fundamentals of policy crowdsourcing. Policy Internet 7(3):340–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raus M, Flügge B, Boutellier R (2009) Electronic customs innovation: an improvement of governmental infrastructures. Gov Inf Q 26:246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rechenberger T, Jung V, Schmidt N, Rosenkranz C (2015) Utilizing the crowd – a literature review on factors influencing crowdsourcing initiative success. In: Pacific conference on information systems (PACIS) 2015 proceedings. Paper 250

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel H, Weber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A (2010) Crowdsourcing critical success factor model strategies to harness the collective intelligence of the crowd. London School of Economics (LSE). Working-Paper 1–2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of the crowds. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • West J, Salter A, Vanhaverbekec W, Chesbrough H (2014) Open innovation: the next decade. Res Policy 43:805–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev 27(2):185–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Euripidis N. Loukis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loukis, E.N. (2018). Citizen-Sourcing for Public Policy Making: Theoretical Foundations, Methods and Evaluation. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Luna-Reyes, L. (eds) Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61762-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics