Skip to main content

Technologies, Possibilities, Emergence and an Ethics of Responsibility: Refiguring Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research

Part of the book series: Digital Ethnography ((DIETH))

Abstract

In this chapter, I propose a processual approach to the contemporary context of digital visual research. I consider the following questions: What does the ‘technological possible’ mean for digital visual research?; What are the implications of seeing researcher engagement with new and emerging technologies as improvisation rather than innovation?; What does this mean for an ethics of responsibility in digital visual research?; How can we harness techniques that involve digital visual technologies for making or ensuring better futures?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amit, V. 2000. The University as Panopticon: Moral Claims and Attacks on Academic Freedom. In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, ed. M. Strathern. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. 2011. Materials in Making. In Redrawing Anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, 21–32. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. 2011. Learning the ‘Banana-Tree’: Self Modification Through Movement. In Redrawing Anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, 77–90. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, A.G., and S. Pink. 2015. Eye Movements, Attention and Movies: Can Top Down Processing Play a Role? Refractory Journal. Online at http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2015/02/06/dyer-pink/.

  • Fors, V., M. Berg, and S. Pink. 2016. Capturing the Ordinary: Imagining the User in Designing and Using Automatic Photographic Lifelogging Technologies. In Lifelogging: Theoretical Approaches and Case Studies about Self-Tracking, ed. S. Selke. Springer VS: Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, E., and T. Ingold. 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation: An Introduction. In Creativity and Cultural Improvisation, ed. E. Hallam and T. Ingold, 1–24, ASA Monograph No. 44. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, A. 2017. The Art of Turning Left and Right. In Anthropologies and Futures, ed. J. Salazar, S. Pink, A. Irving, and J. Sjoberg. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S.J. 2014. Rethinking Repair. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality and Society, ed. T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, and K. Foot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, P. 2000. The Trickster’s Dilemma: Ethics and the Technologies of the Anthropological Self. In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, ed. M. Strathern. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. 2011. Drawing with Our Feet (and Trampling the Maps): Walking with Video as a Graphic Anthropology. In Redrawing Anthropology, ed. T. Ingold, 143–156. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. 2017. Ethics in a Changing World: Embracing Uncertainty, Understanding Futures, and Making Responsible Interventions. In Working in the Between: Theoretical Scholarship and Applied Practice, ed. S. Pink, V. Fors, and T. O’Dell. Berghahn: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., and N. Astari (Directors). 2015. Laundry Lives: Everyday Life and Environmental Sustainability in Indonesia. A Film by Sarah Pink and Nadia Astari, Made in Collaboration with the Digital Ethnography Research Centre and Design Research Institute, RMIT University, and Unilever, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., and Y. Akama and contributors. 2015. Un/Certainty. iBook. Download from http://d-e-futures.com/projects/uncertainty/.

  • Pink, S. 2015. Going Forward Through the World: Thinking Theoretically About First Person Perspective Digital Ethnography. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 49 (2): 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., E. Ardevol, and D. Lanzeni. 2016. Digital Materiality: Configuring a Field of Anthropology/Design? In Digital Materialities: Anthropology and Design, ed. S. Pink, E. Ardevol, and D. Lanzeni. Oxford: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S., V. Fors, and T. O’Dell (eds.). 2017. Theoretical Scholarship and Applied Practice. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postill, J. 2006. Media and Nation Building. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, J.F., S. Pink, A. Irving, and J. Sjoberg (eds.). 2017. Anthropologies and Futures: Techniques for Researching an Uncertain World. Oxford: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., and S. Wright. 2015. Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture, Rankings and the New World Order. Social Anthropology 23 (1): 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. 2000. Afterword: Accountability … and Ethnography. In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, ed. M. Strathern. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strengers, Y. 2016. ‘Envisioning the Smart Home: Reimagining a Smart Energy Future’. In Digital Materailities: Anthropology and Design, eds. S. Pink, E. Ardevol, and D. Lanzeni. Bloomsbury: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Pink .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pink, S. (2017). Technologies, Possibilities, Emergence and an Ethics of Responsibility: Refiguring Techniques. In: Gómez Cruz, E., Sumartojo, S., Pink, S. (eds) Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research. Digital Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61221-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61222-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics