Skip to main content

What Do We Need to Understand About Ethics?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence
  • 6069 Accesses

Abstract

Consideration of ethical questions in AI requires an understanding of some central questions and ideas in ethics. This chapter provides an introduction to ethics which will be used as a basis for further explanation of the particular questions about ethics in AI. Ethics is sometimes seen entirely negatively as restricting developments, but can also be used more positively as assisting in the promotion of beneficial activities. Standard normative ethical theories are outlined, but the focus here is on spelling out underlying questions in ethics. We need to understand that there are diverse accounts of the root need for ethics, questions about the nature of ethical concerns, and questions about who, or what, is the proper object of our moral concern, all of which need to be addressed in thinking about AI. There are also contentious questions about the nature of argument and justification in ethics, including questions about moral relativism , which are especially pertinent to the issue of developing codes of ethics, and which we will need to consider carefully. The issue of transparency in ethics parallels concerns with transparency in AI. Questions about the nature of moral agency and moral motivation are also of prime relevance to discussions of AI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Admin (2017) SCOTUS asks public defender: does use of COMPAS at sentencing violate due process? On point, Wisconsin State Public Defender, 6 March 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1999) Nicomachean ethics (trans: Irwin T), 2nd edn. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson P (2009) Ethics and ethnography. Twenty First Century Soc 4(1):17–30. doi:10.1080/17450140802648439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine (2014) Confessions (trans: Hammond CJ-B). Loeb Classical Library 26. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie N (2009) Organisational integrity and moral climates. In: Brenkert GG (ed) Oxford handbook of business ethics, Oxford handbooks online. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds D, Warburton N (2010) Philosophy bites. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler L (2017) We tested bots like Siri and Alexa to see who would stand up to harassment. Quartz, 22 February 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2013) Distributed morality in an information society. Sci Eng Ethics 19(3):727–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Minds Mach 14(3):349–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud S (2002) Civilisation and its discontents (trans: McLintock D). Penguin Classics. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulhati CM (2005) A new colonialism? Conducting clinical trials in India. N Engl J Med 352(16):1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt J (2013) The righteous mind: why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1972) The moral law, translation of groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (trans: Paton HJ). Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1998) Religion within the boundaries of mere reason: and other writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuschke B (2012) Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Vann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres Case C-236/09 ECJ. De Jure 45(3):624–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy S (2015) How Elon Musk and Y Combinator plan to stop computers from taking over. Backchannel, 11 December 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciano M, Wainwright MA, Wright MJ, Martin NG (2006) The heritability of conscientiousness facets and their relationship to IQ and academic achievement. Personal Individ Differ 40(6):1189–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie JL (1977) Ethics: inventing right and wrong. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1863) Utilitarianism. Parker, Son and Bourn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutafi J, Furnham A, Paltiel L (2004) Why is conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence? Personal Individ Differ 37(5):1013–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (2004) Privacy as contextual integrity. Wash Law Rev 79(1):119–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (2010) Privacy in context: technology, policy and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo U (2011) Killers, fridges, and slaves: a legal journey in robotics. AI Soc 26(4):347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1974) The Republic (trans: Lee D). Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler S (1988) Consequentialism and its critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnall S, Haidt J, Clore GL, Jordan AH (2008) Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34(8):1096–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of Wisonsin v Eric Loomis (2016) 2015AP157-CR. Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock GJ (1971) The object of morality. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BAO (1976) Morality: an introduction to ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman H (2016) The myth of the moral brain: the limits of moral enhancement. MIT Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1973) Philosophical investigations (trans: Anscombe GEM). Blackwells, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo P (2008) The Lucifer effect: understanding how good people turn evil. Random House, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo P, Boyd J (2009) The time paradox: the new psychology of time. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boddington, P. (2017). What Do We Need to Understand About Ethics?. In: Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory, and Algorithms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60647-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60648-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics