Skip to main content

Esophageal Manometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders

Abstract

Esophageal manometry is a test that measures the pressure events in the esophagus and at the two sphincters at each end at rest and in response to liquid and/or solid test swallows. Conventional line-tracing-based and high-resolution manometry systems that utilize spatiotemporal plots are clinically available. The main reason to obtain an esophageal manometry is evaluation of difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) for which a definitive diagnosis has not been achieved by endoscopy or radiographic studies. It is also used to definitely establish the diagnosis of achalasia and its subtypes, an esophageal motility disorder characterized by absent or abnormal esophageal contractions and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax. A hierarchical algorithm (Chicago classification) is available for the interpretation of HRM studies and classification of motility disorders. Manometry is performed with a thin catheter passed through your nose into your esophagus that has multiple pressure sensors to measure contractions. It is usually an outpatient procedure that is generally very safe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:591–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:610–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Gyawali CP, Patel A. Esophageal motor function: technical aspects of manometry. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:527–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Conklin JL, Fox M, Pandolfino JE, Peters JH, Roman S, Staiano A, Vaezi MF. Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:99–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A. Development of a topographic analysis system for manometric studies in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:395–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Schwizer W, Smout AJ. International high resolution Manometry working G: Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(Suppl 1):57–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. Oesophageal high-resolution manometry: moving from research into clinical practice. Gut. 2008;57:405–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, Bruley des Varannes S, Gourcerol G, Coffin B, Ropert A, Roux A, Mion F. High-resolution Manometry improves the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders in patients with dysphagia: a randomized multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:372–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE. International high resolution Manometry working G: the Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ. Intermittent spatial separation of diaphragm and lower esophageal sphincter favors acidic and weakly acidic reflux. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:334–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conklin JL. Evaluation of esophageal motor function with high-resolution Manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19:281–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, Bruley des Varannes S, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Elizalde JI, Gaudric M, Smout AJ, Tack J, Busch OR, Zaninotto G, Boeckxstaens GE. Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:718–25. quiz e13–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernandez JC, Ratuapli SK, Burdick GE, Dibaise JK, Crowell MD. Interrater and intrarater agreement of the chicago classification of achalasia subtypes using high-resolution esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Perez-Fernandez MT, Santander C, Marinero A, Burgos-Santamaria D, Chavarria-Herbozo C. Characterization and follow-up of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction detected by high resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:116–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Hoeij FB, Smout AJ, Bredenoord AJ. Characterization of idiopathic esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Management of spastic disorders of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2013;42:27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rengarajan A, Drapekin J, Patel A, Gyawali CP. Comparison of two high-resolution manometry software systems in evaluating esophageal motor function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(12):1836–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sweis R, Anggiansah A, Wong T, Kaufman E, Obrecht S, Fox M. Normative values and inter-observer agreement for liquid and solid bolus swallows in upright and supine positions as assessed by esophageal high-resolution manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23:509–e198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roman S, Damon H, Pellissier PE, Mion F. Does body position modify the results of oesophageal high resolution manometry? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22:271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nativ-Zeltzer N, Logemann JA, Zecker SG, Kahrilas PJ. Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography – a normative study of younger and older adults. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28:721–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edy Soffer M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soffer, E., Shaker, A. (2018). Esophageal Manometry. In: Bardan, E., Shaker, R. (eds) Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59352-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59352-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59350-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59352-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics