Skip to main content

Challenges to International Stem Cell Clinical Trials in Countries with Diverging Regulations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Safety, Ethics and Regulations

Part of the book series: Stem Cells in Clinical Applications ((SCCA))

Abstract

This chapter addresses challenges to the organization and conduct of international stem cell clinical trials in a context of regulatory pluralism. Multi-country clinical trial collaborations in stem cell medicine have the potential to speed up clinical developments and to widen access to new treatments among patients. However, the regulatory procedures through which the safety and efficacy of stem cell-based treatments are determined vary widely across countries. Internationally harmonized governance frameworks are not yet in place. In this chapter we show that this high level of regulatory variation and the absence of internationally binding standards for clinical stem cell research present important challenges to multi-country clinical trial collaborations. Four types of challenges will be highlighted. First is the need to inquire into and interact with regulatory procedures and law in multiple countries. Second, the interaction with medical authorities in multiple countries is resulting in a high level of organizational complexity. Third consists of delays, increased costs, and uncertainties that result from nonexistent, unclear, or still emerging regulatory arrangements in different countries. Fourth is that the high level of regulatory variation across countries necessitates far-reaching forms of scientific self-governance, training, and procedural adjustments in participating clinical trial sites. To illustrate this point, the chapter presents a case study of project-internal self-governance and capacity building in the context of a clinical trial infrastructure that is active across the contexts of China, Hong Kong, and the USA. The chapter concludes with a call for the creation of an international support structure that systematically addresses these problems. Five measures that may help to reduce existing difficulties will be introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is based on three papers that I have published in 2014 and 2015. These papers are (1) Rosemann A (2015) Multi-country stem cell trials: the need for an international support structure. Stem Cell Res 14(3):396–400; (2) Rosemann A (2015) Stem cell treatments for neurodegenerative diseases: challenges from a science, business and healthcare perspectives, Neurodegener Dis Manag 5(2):85–87; and (3) Rosemann A (2014) Standardization as situation-specific achievement: regulatory diversity and the production of value in intercontinental collaborations in stem cell medicine. Soc Sci Med 122:72–80. I have rearranged information from these articles and developed them further in the context of this chapter. These articles have been published open access under a CC-BY license. I am permitted to use and reproduce segments of these texts in this chapter.

References

  • Andrews PW, Cavagnaro J, Deans R, Feigal E, Horowitz E, Keating A, Rao M, Turner M, Wilmut I, Yamanaka S (2014) Harmonizing standards for producing clinical-grade therapies from pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 32(8):724–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arcidiacono JA, Blair JW, Benton KA (2012) US Food and Drug Administration international collaborations for cellular therapy product regulation. Stem Cell Res Ther 3(5):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M (2005) Stem cell therapy or snake oil? Nat Biotechnol 23(12):1467–1469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AC, Beachy SH, Olson S (2014) Stem cell therapies: opportunities for ensuring the quality and safety of clinical offerings: summary of a joint workshop. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagavati S (2015) Stem cell therapy: challenges ahead. Indian J Pediatr 82(3):286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco P, Sipp D (2014) Sell help not hope. Nature 510(7505):336–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blasimme A (2013) Translating stem cells to the clinic: scientific societies and the making of regenerative medicine. Quaderni 2:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan P (2011) Geron Corp. shuts down world’s first stem cell trial. OC Sci. http://sciencedude.ocregister.com/2011/11/16/geron-corp-shuts-down-worlds-first-stem-cell-trial/159883/. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Bubela T, Reshef A, Li MD, Atkins H, Caulfield T, Culme-Seymour E, Gold ER, Illes J, Isasi R, McCabe C, Ogbogu U, Piret J, Mason C (2012) Enabling advanced cell therapies (EnACT): invitation to an online forum on resolving barriers to clinical translation. Regen Med 7(6):735–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bubela T, Mishra A, Mathews D (2014) Policies and practices to enhance multi-sectorial collaborations and commercialization of regenerative medicine. In: Hogle L (ed) Regenerative medicine ethics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 67–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski D (2006) Patients warned about unproven spinal surgery. Nature 440(7086):850–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski D (2009) Stem cell therapy faces more scrutiny in China: but regulations remain unclear for companies that supply treatments. Nature 459(7244):146–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cyranoski D (2013) Japan to offer fast-track approval path for stem cell therapies. Nat Med 19(5):510–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner A (2012) Law’s performativities: shaping the emergence of regenerative medicine through European Union legislation. Soc Stud Sci 42(5):753–774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (2008) Human subject protection; foreign clinical studies not conducted under an investigational new drug application. Fed Regist 73(82):22800–22816

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink DW (2009) FDA regulation of stem cell-based products. Science 324(5935):1662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hourd P, Chandra A, Medcalf N, Williams G (2014) Regulatory challenges for the manufacture and scale-out of autologous cell therapies. Stembook; Internet, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201975/. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Hyun IS (2010) Allowing room for innovative stem cell-based therapies outside clinical trials: ethical and practical challenges. J Law Med Ethics 38(2):277–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isasi R (2012) Alliances, collaborations and consortia: the international stem cell forum and its role in shaping global governance and policy. Regen Med 7(6s):84–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISSCR (2008) ISSCR guidelines for the clinical translation of stem cells. International Society for Stem Cell Research. Available at http://www.isscr.org/GuidelinesforClinicalTranslation/2480.htm. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Keating P, Cambrosio A (2012) Cancer on trial: oncology as a new style of practice. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirstead H (2008) Challenges to the clinical viability of stem cell technology. Spinal Cord Injury—what are the barriers to cure? Cambridge, MA: Bedford Center Workshop 29, p 2008. http://www.spinalcordworkshop.org/portfolio-type/hans-keirstead-phd-challenges-to-the-clinical-viability-of- stem-cell-technologies/. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Keirstead H (2012) Translation of stem cell therapies. Spinal Cord Injury—what are the barriers to cure? Bedford Center Spinal Cord Workshop. http://www.spinalcordworkshop.org/portfolio-type/hans-keirstead-phd- translation-of-stem-cell-based-therapies/. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Kiatpongsan S, Sipp D (2008) Offshore stem cell treatments. Nat Rep Stem Cells 10:1038

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoepfler P (2012) Yamanaka on making iPS cells from each patient: ‘in reality, we cannot do that. http://www.ipscell.com/2012/11/yamanaka-on-making-ips-cells-from-each-patient-in-reality-we-cannot-do-that/. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Knoepfler PS (2015) From bench to FDA to bedside: US regulatory trends for new stem cell therapies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 82:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li MD, Atkins H, Bubela T (2014) The global landscape of stem cell clinical trials. Regen Med 9(1):27–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall O, Hyun IS (2009) Medical innovation versus stem cell tourism. Science 324:1664–1665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lysaght T, Sipp D (2014) Dislodging the direct to consumer marketing of stem cell- based interventions from medical tourism. In: Parry B et al (eds) Bodies across borders: the global circulation of body parts, medical tourists and professionals. Ashgate Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell K, Trounson A, Baum E (2010) Stem cell therapies in clinical trials: workshop on best practices and the need for harmonization. Cell Stem Cell 7(4):451–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon D (2014) The global industry for unproven stem cell interventions and stem cell tourism. Tissue Eng Regen Med 11(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minisman G, Bhanushali M, Conwit R, Wolfe GI, Aban I, Kaminski HJ, Cutter G (2012) Implementing clinical trials on an international platform: challenges and perspectives. J Neurol Sci 313(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan GH (2014) H.R.4475—Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act of 2014. CONGRESS.GOV. https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4475. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013) Novel neurotechnologies: intervening in the brain. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Novel_neurotechnologies_report_PDF_web_0.pdf. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • OECD (2011). Facilitating international cooperation in non-commercial clinical trials. Global Science Forum. http://www.oecd.org/science/scienceandtechnologypolicy/49344626.pdf. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015

  • Ravinetto RM, Talisuna A, Crop M, Loen H, Menten J, Overmeir C (2013) Challenges of non-commercial multicentre North–South collaborative clinical trials. Tropical Med Int Health 18(2):237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A (2013) Medical innovation and national experimental pluralism: insights from clinical stem cell research and applications in China. BioSocieties 8(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A (2014a) Why regenerative stem cell medicine progresses slower than expected. J Cell Biochem 115(12):2073–2076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A (2014b) Standardization as situation-specific achievement: regulatory diversity and the production of value in intercontinental collaborations in stem cell medicine. Soc Sci Med 122:72–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A (2015) Stem cell treatments for neurodegenerative diseases: challenges from a science, business and healthcare perspective. Neurodegener Dis Manag 5(2):85–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A, Bortz G, Vasen F (2016) Global regulatory developments for clinical stem cell research: diversification and challenges to collaborations. Regen Med 11(7):647–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann A, Sleeboom-Faulkner M (2016) New regulation for clinical stem cell research in China—expected impact and challenges for implementation. Regen Med 11(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter B (2009) State strategies and the geopolitics of the global knowledge economy: China, India and the case of regenerative medicine. Geopolitics 14(1):47–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sariola S, Simpson B (2013) Precarious ethics: toxicology research among self-poisoning hospital admissions in Sri Lanka. BioSocieties 8(1):41–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipp D (2014) The domestication of stem cell tourism. In: Joly Y, Knoppers BM (eds) Routledge handbook of medical law and ethics. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeboom-Faulkner M (2013) Latent science collaboration: Strategies of bioethical capacity building in Mainland China’s stem cell world. Biosocieties 8(1):7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeboom-Faulkner M et al (2016) Comparing national home-keeping and the regulation of translational stem cell applications: an international perspective. Soc Sci Med 153:40–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui S, Sleeboom-Faulkner M (2015) Governance of stem cell research and its clinical translation in China: an example of profit-oriented bionetworking. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 9(4):397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar V, Studer L (2014) Pluripotent stem cells in regenerative medicine: challenges and recent progress. Nat Rev Genet 15:82–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari SS, Raman S (2014) Governing stem cell therapy in India: regulatory vacuum or jurisdictional ambiguity? New Genet Soc 33(4):413–433

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tuch B, Wall D (2014) Self-regulation of autologous cell therapies. Med J Austin 200:196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan S, Rao M, Keating A, Srivastava A (2013) Overcoming challenges to initiating cell therapy clinical trials in rapidly developing countries: India as a model. Stem Cells Transl Med 2:607–613

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg A, Rehmann-Sutter C, Sleeboom-Faulkner M, Lu G, Döring O, Cong Y et al (2013) From global bioethics to ethical governance of biomedical research collaborations. Soc Sci Med 98:293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth E (2010) Preclinical and phase 1 development of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury. In Conference presentation, the international conference of stem cells and regenerative medicine for neurodegenerative diseases, Hualien, Taiwan, 24 Apr 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohn DY (2012) Korea okays stem cell therapies despite limited peer-reviewed data. Nat Med 18(3):329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zarzeczny A, Caulfield T, Ogbogu U, Bell P, Crooks VA, Kamenova K, Master Z (2014) Professional regulation: a potentially valuable tool in responding to “stem cell tourism”. Stem Cell Rep 3(3):379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article has benefited from research support provided by the European Research Council (ERC: 283219) and the Economic and Social Science Research Council ESRC: ES/I018107/1). Due to ethical concerns, supporting data cannot be made openly available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Achim Rosemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosemann, A. (2017). Challenges to International Stem Cell Clinical Trials in Countries with Diverging Regulations. In: Pham, P., Rosemann, A. (eds) Safety, Ethics and Regulations. Stem Cells in Clinical Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59165-0_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics