Abstract
Today’s Internet possibilities, namely Web 2.0 features such as easy information access, production, share, and (re) use, have contributed to significant changes in the way teachers access information through other people’s contributions. Arising from Web 2.0 tools diversity, new kinds of possibilities and resources are available nowadays, as well as new online environments that are cropping up in teachers’ practices, allowing for the emergence of a culture of sharing and participation (Brown, 2008).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To avoid readers’ “jumping” between the abbreviations OAR [Open Access Repository(ies)] and OER [Open Access Resource(s)], the authors adopted the terminology Digital Educational Resource(s) (abbreviated as DER), instead of OER.
- 2.
- 3.
See “Has ‘Run’ Run Amok? It Has 645 Meanings … So Far”, by Neal Conan, in http://www.np r.org/2011/05/30/136796448/has-run-run-amok-it-has-645-meanings-so-far, interviewing Simon Winchester, May 30, 2011, about his “A Verb for Our Frantic Times” (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/opinion/29winchester.html?_r=0, May 28th, 2011). Retrieved May 28th, 2016.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Alevizou, P. (2012). Open to interpretation?: productive frameworks for understanding audience engagement with OER. In Cambridge 2012: Innovation and impact—openly collaborating to Enhance education, a joint meeting of OER12 and OpenCourseWare Consortium Global 2012 (pp. 16–18). Queens: The Open University. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/33452/.
Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (2002). E-research: Methods, strategies, and issues (1st ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2014). Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 22(20889), 1–13. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.20889.
Baumgartner, P., Naust, V., Canals, A., Ferran, N., Minguillón, J., Pascual, M., … Schaffert, S. (2012). Open educational practices and resources—OLCOS roadmap. OLCOS project. Retrieved from http://www.olcos.org/english/roadmap/download/index.htm.
Beaulieu, A., & Wouters, P. (2009). E-research as intervention. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), E-research: Transformations in scholarly practice (pp. 54–69). New York: Routledge.
Blas, N., Fioreb, A., Mainettib, L., Vergallob, R., & Paolinia, P. (2014). A portal of educational resources: Providing evidence for matching pedagogy with technology. Research in Learning Technology, 22(22906), 1–26. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.22906.
Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2012). Innovating learning: Key elements for developing creative classrooms in Europe. JRC Scientific and Politcy Reports. Luxembourg. doi:10.2791/90566.
Brown, J. (2008). Foreword: Creating a culture of learning. In T. Iiyoshi & M. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. xi–xvii). FL: University Press of Florida.
Browne, T., Holding, R., Howell, A., & Rodway-Dyer, S. (2010). The challenges of OER to academic practice. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2010(1), 1–15. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ910518.pdf.
Cardoso, E. (2009). Estudos sobre repositórios institucionais e repositórios de recursos educativos: metodologias, resultados e recomendações. Master’s thesis, University of Minho. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1822/10537.
Cardoso, G., Mendonça, S., Lima, T., Paisana, M., & Neves, M. (2014). In OberCom—Observatório da Comunicação (Ed.), A Internet em Portugal—Sociedade em Rede 2014. Lisboa: Publicações OberCom. Retrieved from http://www.obercom.pt.
Castro, C., Ferreira, S., & Andrade, A. (2011). Repositórios de Recursos Educativos Digitais em Portugal no Ensino Básico e Secundário: que caminho a percorrer? In Proceedings CISTI’2011—6a Conferência Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação (pp. 489–495). Chaves: AISTI Associação Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/8359.
Clements, K., & Pawlowski, J. (2012). User-oriented quality for OER: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust [special issue]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 4–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x.
de Jong, T., van Riesen, S., Sikken, J., Anjewierden, A., Bollen, L., Wassink-Kamp, E., … Zutin, D. (2015). Go-Lab: Deliverable D8.3—First trial report. Go-Lab consortium. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.go-lab-project.eu/sites/default/files/files/deliverable/file/Go-Lab_D8.3.pdf.
Discover Programme. (2015). Our mission. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://gulbenkian.pt/descobrir/mais/a-nossa-missao/.
Edwards, S., & Nuttall, J. (2015). Teachers, technologies and the concept of integration. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 375–377. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2015.1074817.
Ertmer, P., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.
European Commission. (2013). Opening up education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open education. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Brussels. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0654&from=EN.
European Schoolnet. (2016). European schoolnet. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://www.eun.org.
Fabian, C., Kieslinger, B., Holocher-Ertl, T., & Hochgerner, J. (2013). Evaluation report on experiences of GLOBAL excursion materials and activities. Brussels: Global Excursion. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/100728_en.html.
Francisco, M. (2012). A utilização de Recursos Educativos Digitais no Ensino Superior a Distância: a perceção do estudante e o modo como utiliza os recursos digitais para fins educativos. Master’s thesis, Open University. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/2338.
GLOBAL Excursion. (2016). GLOBAL excursion. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://www.globalexcursion-project.eu/.
Go-Lab Project. (2016). Go-Lab project. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://go-lab-project.eu/.
Goldschmidt, M., Pöhnl, S., & Bogner, F. (2012). Open science resources: Towards the development of a shared digital repository for formal and informal science education: Validation report 2 cycle. Open science resources. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.ea.gr/ep/osr/material/D-6.4-Validation Report Second Cycle.pdf.
Gras-Velázquez, A., Clements, K., Craeye, P., Moura-Caravalho, J., Rodriguez-Yebra, M., Kubilinskiene, S., … Oprea, D. (2011). ASPECT: National validation reports: Belgium, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania. ASPECT project. Retrieved from http://www.aspect-project.org/node/28.
Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99–108). Chesapeake: Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education (SITE). Retrieved from https://chathamcat.pbworks.com/f/HarrisHofer-TPACKActivityTypes.pdf.
Hew, K., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
Hoermann, S., Hildebrandt, T., Rensing, C., & Steinmetz, R. (2005). Resource center: A digital learning object repository with an integrated authoring tool set. In World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 3453–3460). Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved from ftp://www.kom.tu-darmstadt.de/papers/HHRSt05_691.pdf.
House of Sciences. (2015a). First house of sciences international meeting. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/iencontrointernacional/.
House of Sciences. (2015b). Frames. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/cc/index.php?idart=55.
House of Sciences. (2015c). Partnerships. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/cc/index.php?idart=287.
House of Sciences. (2015d). Second House of Sciences International Meeting. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/2encontrointernacional/
House of Sciences. (2015e). Support texts. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/cc/index.php?idart=290.
House of Sciences. (2016a). Digital educational resources. Retrieved January 31, 2016, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/cc/redindex.php.
House of Sciences. (2016b). Homepage. Retrieved January 31, 2016, from http://www.casadasciencias.org/.
Jankowski, N. (2009). The contours and challenges of e-research. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), E-research: Transformations in scholarly practice (pp. 3–31). New York: Routledge.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. http://doi.org/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131510001545.
Jimoyiannis, A., Tsiotakis, P., Roussinos, D., & Siorenta, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 248–267. doi:10.1234/ajet.v29i2.157.
Kearney, C. (2016). Efforts to increase students’ interest in pursuing science, technology, engineering and mathematics studies and careers: National measures taken by 30 countries—2015 Report. European Schoolnet. Brussels. Retrieved from http://files.eun.org/scientix/Observatory/ComparativeAnalysis2015/Kearney-2016-NationalMeasures-30-countries-2015-Report.pdf.
Kilburn, D., & Earley, J. (2015). Disqus website-based commenting as an eresearch method: Engaging doctoral and earlycareer academic learners in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(3), 288–303. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2015.1026253.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm.
Koh, J., & Chai, C. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222–232. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017.
Koh, J., Chai, C., & Tay, L. (2014). TPACK-in-action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022.
Kopcha, T. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014.
Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97–111. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/7_3/10.pdf.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Enhance teachers’ productivity with new tools for designing teaching and learning. In S. Northen (Ed.), System upgrade realising the vision for UK education—A report from the ESRC/EPSRC technology enhanced learning (pp. 37–39). London: University of London—Technology Enhanced Learning Research Programme. Retrieved from http://tel.ioe.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/TELreport.pdf.
Learning Resource Exchange. (2016). Homepage. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://lreforschools.eun.org/.
Manches, A. (2012). Go beyond the keyboard and mouse to learn through movement and gesture. In S. Northen (Ed.), System upgrade realising the vision for UK education—A report from the ESRC/EPSRC technology enhanced learning (pp. 33–34). London: University of London—Technology Enhanced Learning Research Programme. Retrieved from http://tel.ioe.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/TELreport.pdf.
Millaruelo, C., Martín, R., Felpeto, P., Gil, M., Yáñez, M., Cañizares, A., … Vicente, R. (2014). Guía para la evaluación de repositorios institucionales de investigación. Ministério da Ciencia e Innovación de España, FECYT, Recolecta e CRUE. Retrieved from https://www.recolecta.fecyt.es/guias-y-directrices.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. Retrieved from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/publications/journal_articles/mishra-koehler-tcr2006.pdf.
Open Science Resources. (2016). Open science resources. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from http://www.openscienceresources.eu/.
Pegler, C. (2012). Herzberg, hygiene and the motivation to reuse: Towards a three-factor theory to explain motivation to share and use OER. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–18. doi:10.5334/2012-04.
Ramos, J., Teodoro, V., & Ferreira, F. (2011). Recursos Educativos Digitais: que futuro?—Recursos educativos digitais: reflexões sobre a prática. In Cadernos SACAUSEF VII. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação e Ciência Direção-Geral de Inovação e de Desenvolvimento Curricular. Retrieved from https://dspace.uevora.pt/rdpc/bitstream/10174/5051/1/1330429397_Sacausef7_11_35_RED_reflexoes_pratica.pdf.
Sampson, D., Zervas, P., & Sotiriou, S. (2012). Open access to science education resources and learning designs in Europe. In 2012 IEEE fourth international conference on technology for education (pp. 200–203). Hyderabad: IEEE Computer Society. doi:10.1109/T4E.2012.25.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Shin, T. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpack): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.
School Libraries Network. (2015). Projects and partnerships. Retrieved January 5, 2015, from http://rbe.mec.pt/np4/437.html.
Scientix. (2016). Scientix. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://www.scientix.eu/.
Seiça, R. (2009). TREE—Um Repositório de Objectos Educativos de Software Aberto com Perfil de Metadados. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10216/58424.
Shafi, M., Sumeer, G., & Tariq, A. (2013). Web 2.0 interactivity in open access repositories. The Electronic Library, 31(6), 703–712. doi:10.1108/EL-08-2011-0121.
Shueb, S., & Sofi, R. (2014). Web 2.0 interactivity in open access (OA) repositories: An analysis. Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(1), 29–38. doi:10.1108/EL-08-2011-0121.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0013189X015002004?journalCode=edra.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ351846.
Stone, M. (2014). Scientix the community for science education in Europe. Brussels: European Schoolnet. Retrieved from http://www.scientix.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=6c22a98f-9c5f-4e49-b24e-6f5d2ad9ee5e&groupId=10137.
Tasiopoulou, E., Mihai, G., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S., Kamp, E., Kollöffel, B., … Orduña, P. (2014). Go-Lab: Deliverable D8.1—Validation and evaluation plan and evaluation matrix. Go-Lab consortium. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.go-lab-project.eu/deliverables.
Tavares, R. (2016). Collaborative learning assessment in mobile-learning using web 2.0 tools. In A. Carvalho, S. Cruz, C. Marques, A. Moura, I. Santos, & N. Zagalo (Eds.), Atas do 3.o Encontro sobre Jogos e mobile learning (pp. 209–219). Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, LabTE. Retrieved from https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/jspui/handle/10316/31171.
Tavares, R., & Vieira, R. (2016). Formação contínua de professores do 1.o CEB em TIC: o desenvolvimento de RED com recurso a ferramentas da Web 2.0. In D. Alves, H. Pinto, I. Dias, M. Abreu, & R. Muñoz (Eds.), V Conferência Internacional Investigação, Práticas e Contextos em Educação (2016). Leiria: Escola Superior de Educação e Ciências Sociais—Instituto Politécnico de Leiria. Retrieved from https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4602618/Atas_IPCE_2016.pdf.
Tavares, R., Vieira, R., & Pedro, L. (2016). Impacto da formação contínua segundo o referencial TPACK na utilização e desenvolvimento de recursos educativos digitais por professores do 1.o CEB. In Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa (Ed.), Digital Technologies & Future School: Atas do IV Congresso Internacional TIC e Educação 2016 (artigos selecionados) (pp. 1180–1197). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa. Retrieved from https://cld.pt/dl/download/e7500488-3c2a-4d99-9de0-ade4c5cc9aba/Livro_Artigos.pdf.
TPACK, Matthew, J. (2015). TPACK.org. Retrieved December 7, 2015, from http://www.tpack.org/
Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. (2012). The “third”-order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education [special issue]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060. Retrieved from http://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/810/108.
UNESCO. (2012). 2012 Paris OER declaration. World Open Educational Resources (OER) congress. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/index.php?id=64395.
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml.
van Assche, F., Massart, D., Vuorikari, R., Duval, E., Vandeputte, B., Baumgartner, P., … Mesdom, F. (2009). Experiences with the learning resource exchange for schools in Europe. eLearning Papers, 17, 1–15. Retrieved from www.elearningpapers.eu
Windle, R., Wharrad, H., McCormick, D., Laverty, H., & Taylor, M. (2010). Sharing and reuse in OER: Experiences gained from open reusable learning objects in health. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1–18. doi:10.5334/2010-4.
Wishart, J., & Thomas, M. (2015). Introducing e-research in educational contexts, digital methods and issues arising. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(3), 223–229. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2015.1036852.
Yalaho, A., Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Wilson, R. (2011). ASPECT: Final evaluation report. ASPECT project. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.aspect-project.org/node/28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tavares, R., Moreira, A. (2017). Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development. In: Implications of Open Access Repositories Quality Criteria and Features for Teachers’ TPACK Development. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57916-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57916-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57915-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57916-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)