Skip to main content

The Sustainability Illusion Versus the Recycling Renaissance - A Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automotive Recycling, Plastics, and Sustainability
  • 2915 Accesses

Abstract

Are we even in theory on the right path? The results obtained for this book turned out to be highly controversial, especially when comparing theory with reality. Therefore, an extensive discussion provides an analysis of patterns, exceptions, relationships, and the generalisation of results. In fact, how significant are the results? What do we now understand with the results? And do they (dis-)agree with previous works? When considering the theories discussed in Chap. 2, such as human ecology, eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness, resource and impact decoupling, as well as corporate sustainability, it becomes clear that these notions offer valuable strategies to improve sustainability in the economic world. However, the results from Chaps. 3 and 4 show that these theories still remain mostly theories. Many companies know in theory how to apply sustainability, Ecodesign, however you might call it. However, many of them incorporate sustainability not as a vision, but as a way to achieve compliance with the law. This is now unravelled in a discussion of a possible sustainability illusion followed by an investigation of the chance of a recycling renaissance, and whether this is the right path for the automotive plastics production and recycling system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For this analysis the following term without was used: “recycling + Recycling + RECYCLING”.

  2. 2.

    For this analysis the following term without was used: “(plastics recycling) + (Plastics Recycling) + (Plastics recycling) + (PLASTICS RECYCLING) + (plastic recycling) + (Plastic Recycling) + (Plastic recycling)”.

  3. 3.

    “The base scenario, for which a degree of virgin plastic displaced by recycled plastic of 100% is assumed, is compared to a scenario in which only 20% of the recyclate replaces virgin plastic (the remainder being evenly split between substituting for concrete and wood)”. (Jean-Charles et al. 2010, p. 50).

References

  • Authorised Treatment Facilities [ATF professional]. 2015. Recycled plastics grades starting to have impact. http://www.atfprofessional.co.uk/1502plastics.aspx. Accessed 10 Aug 2015.

  • Baumgartner, R.J., H. Biedermann, and M. Zwainz. 2009. Ă–ko-Effizienz: Konzepte, Anwendungen und Best Practices. vol. 3. Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R.J. and D. Ebner. 2010. Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development 18 (2): 76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMW Group. 2015. Sustainable Value Report 2015. https://www.bmwgroup.com/ content/dam/bmw-group-websites/bmwgroup_com/responsibility/downloads/ de/2015/BMW_SVR_2015_RZ_DE.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2017.

  • Braungart, M., W. McDonough, and A. Bollinger. 2007. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions-a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (13): 1337–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. et al. 2013. Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the lowcarbon economy. Energy Policy 53: 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartier, Y., Emmanuel, J., Pieper, U., PrĂĽss, A., Rushbrook, P., Stringer, R., Townend, W., Wilburn, S., Zghondi, R. 2014. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities. World Health Organization, (Ed. 2). World health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. 2006. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. et al. 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters 8 (2). IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024. CC BY 3.0.

  • Daniels, E.J. et al. 2004. Sustainable end-of-life vehicle recycling: R&D collaboration between industry and the US DOE. JOM 56 (8): 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiePresse. 2013. Das Gute, das Bessere und das Echte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, D., and H.L. MacLean. 2007. The role of product information in automotive plastics recycling: a financial and life cycle assessment’. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (11–12): 1158–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEF [manufacturers’ association]. 2012. Government must take stronger action over looming raw material shortage. http://www.eef.org.uk/about-eef/medianews-and-insights/media-releases/2012/aug/government-must-take-strongeraction- over-looming-raw-material-shortage. Accessed 30 June 2015.

  • Emerson, J.W., Hsu, A., Levy, M. A., de Sherbinin, A., Mara, V., Esty, D. C., and Jaiteh, M. 2012. Environmental performance index and pilot trend environmental performance index. New Haven: Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2015. Environment: Higher recycling targets to drive transition to a Circular Economy with new jobs and sustainable growth. \(\copyright \) European Union 1995–2017. Accessed 10 Feb 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Umweltbundesamt GmbH. 2010. End of life vehicles: Legal aspects, national practices and recommendations for future successful approach. \(\copyright \) European Union 1995–2017. Accessed 20 June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. 2013. Green Paper On a European Strategy on Plastic Waste in the Environment. http://eur-lex.europa.eu. \(\copyright \) European Union 1995–2017. Accessed 10 Feb 2017.

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., and M. Swilling. 2011. Decoupling: natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin Associates (2011). Revised Final report. Life Cycle Inventory of 100% Post Consumer HDPE and PET recycled resin from post-consumer containers and Packaging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Inc. 2017. Google Books Ngram Viewer. http://books.google.com/ ngrams. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.

  • Janschitz, S., and F.M. Zimmermann. 2010. Regional modeling and the logics of sustainability—a social theory approach for regional development and change. Enviromental Economics 1 (1): 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean-Charles, M. et al. 2010. Environmental benefits of recycling—2010 update. http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Environmental_benefits_of_recycling_2010_update.3b174d59.8816.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2013.

  • Jenseit, W. et al. 2003. Recovery options for plastic parts from end-of-life vehicles: an eco-efficiency assessment. Ă–ko-Institut eV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanari, N. et al. 2003. End-of-life vehicle recycling in the European Union. JOM 55 (8): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D. et al. 2013. Sustainability’s next frontier. In MIT Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koplin, J., S. Seuring, and M. Mesterharm. 2007. Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry—the case of the Volkswagen AG. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (11–12): 1053–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulke, E. 2013. Wirtschaftsgeographie. 5. UTB; 2434: Geographie, Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaGrega, M.D., P.L. Buckingham, and J.C. Evans. 2010. Hazardous waste management. Waveland Press. Reissue edition (July 1, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maudet, C., G. Bertoluci, and D. Froelich. 2012. Integrating plastic recycling industries into the automotive supply chain. Published by “HAL” (The open archive HAL)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., and M. Braungart. 2013. The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability-Designing for Abundance. North Point Press; 1st edition (April 16, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, J.-B. et al. 2011. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331 (6014): 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. et al. 2014. Challenges and Alternatives to Plastics Recycling in the Automotive Sector. Materials 7 (8): 5883–5902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, R.K. et al. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J., M. Alexander, A. Gurr, and D. Greenwood. 2011. Preparing for a life cycle \(CO_{2}\) measure. Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership, Ricardo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl-Vorbach, E. et al. 2015. Sustainable Open Innovation and its influence on economic and sustainability innovation performance. The XXVI ISPIM Conference 2015 budapest, Hungary, 14–17 June 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • PlasticsEurope. 2014. Eco-profiles and Environmental Product Declarations of the EuropeanPlastics Manufacturers—High-density Polyethylene (HDPE), Low-density Polyethylene (LDPE), Linear Low-density Polyethylene (LLDPE). http://www.plasticseurope.org/plastics-sustainability-14017/eco-profiles.aspx. Accessed 10 Dec 2016.

  • Pomberger, R., and A. Ragossnig. 2014. Future waste—waste future. In: Waste management & research: the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA 32 (2): 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • RecyclingToday. 2010. European Plastics Recyclers Discuss Plastic Scrap Exports. http://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/European-Plastics-Recyclers-EU-talks. Accessed 1 Oct 2015.

  • Woynillowicz, D., and C. Severson-Baker. 2009. Oil Sands Fever-The Environmental Implications of Canada’s Oil Sands Rush. The Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • WRAP [Waste & Resources Action Programme]. 2013. WRAP outlines ÂŁ330BN economic growth potential for EU from smarter resource use. http://www.wrap.org.uk/content/wrap-outlines-%C2%A3330bn-economic-growth-potential-eusmarter- resource-use. Accessed 30 June 2015.

  • Zero Waste Europe [ZWE]. 2014. Press Release: Circular Economy Package puts Europe firmly on the Zero Waste track but.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Schönmayr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schönmayr, D. (2017). The Sustainability Illusion Versus the Recycling Renaissance - A Discussion. In: Automotive Recycling, Plastics, and Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57400-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics