Skip to main content

Anglo-Saxon Concepts of Dis/Ability: Placing Disease at Great Chesterford in Its Wider Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bioarchaeology of Impairment and Disability

Abstract

Within Anglo-Saxon society , individuals obtained their status on the basis of their ability to undertake required and prescribed social roles . People experiencing impairment, be that as a result of disease or some other process including trauma or pregnancy, might thus have reduced ability to undertake socially required activities. These people would have been highly visible within contemporary society by their very inability to undertake all required roles. These ideas are explored using a cluster of inhumations from the early Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Great Chesterford. Cemetery topography, visibility of difference, liminality , and etiology are explored in order to suggest the importance of the development of a sample-based approach to osteobiography. These might then be used to establish local understandings of disability, whereby individuals are viewed as people with focus placed on ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aspöck, E. (2015). Funerary and post-depositional body treatments at the Middle Anglo-Saxon Cemetery Winnall II: Norm, variety—And deviance? In: Z. L. Devlin & E-J. Graham (Eds.), Death embodied: Archaeological approaches to the treatment of the corpse (pp. 86–108). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonser, W. (1963). The medical background of Anglo-Saxon England: A study in history, psychology, and Folklore. London: The Welcome Historical Medical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, J. (2014). The story of pain: From prayer to Painkiller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin, A. T. (2016). Exploring the social construction of disability: An application of the bioarchaeology of personhood model to a pathological skeleton from ancient Bahrain. International Journal of Paleopathology, 12, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckberry, J. (2007). On sacred ground: Social identity and churchyard burial in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, c. 700–1100 AD. In: H. Williams & S. Semple (Eds.), Early medieval mortuary practices (pp. 120–132). Anglo-Saxon studies in archaeology and history (Vol 14). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckberry, J. (2014). Osteological evidence of corporeal and capital punishment in Later Anglo-Saxon England. In: J. P. Gates & N. Marafioti (Eds.), Capital and corporal punishment in Anglo-Saxon England (pp. 131–148). Anglo-Saxon Studies 23. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckberry, J. L., & Hadley, D. M. (2007). An Anglo-Saxon execution cemetery and Walkington Wold, Yorkshire. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 26, 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E., & Craig, G. (2013). The diagnosis and context of a facial deformity from an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Spofforth, North Yorkshire. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 23, 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S. (1991). When do Anglo-Saxon children count? Journal of Theoretical Archaeology, 2, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, S. (2010). Differentiation in Later Anglo-Saxon burial ritual on the basis of mental or physical impairment. In J. Buckberry & A. Cherryson (Eds.), Burial in Later Anglo-Saxon England c 650-1100 (pp. 93–102). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M. (1999). Accessing the inaccessible: Disability and archaeology. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15, 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. M., Perrucio, A. V., Ibrahim, S., Hogg-Johnson, S., Wong, R., & Badley, E. M. (2012). Understanding recovery: Changes in the relationships of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) components over time. Social Science and Medicine, 75, 1999–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, J. D. (1980). The Human Bones. In: J. D. Dawes & J. R. Magilton (Eds.) The cemetery of St Helen-on-the-Walls, Aldwark. The archaeology of York The Medieval Cemeteries 12/1 (pp. 19–82). Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaitre, L. (2013). Medieval medicine: The art of healing, from head to toe. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettwyler, K. A. (1991). Can paleopathology provide evidence of “compassion”? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84, 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin, Z. L. (2015). ‘(Un)touched by decay’: Anglo-Saxon encounters with dead bodies. In: Z. L. Devlin & E-J. Graham (Eds.), Death embodied: Archaeological approaches to the treatment of the corpse (pp. 63–85). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitte, S. N., & Stojanowski, C. M. (2015). The osteological paradox 20 years later: Past perspectives, future directions. Journal of Archaeological Research, 23(4), 397–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, J. (1986). Excavations at great Chesterford, Essex, 1953-5. Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society, 75, 3–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duday, H. (2009). The archaeology of the dead: Lectures in archaeothanatology (A. M. Cipriani & J. Pearce, Trans.). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duday, H., Courtaud, P., Crubezy, E., Sellier, P., & Tillier, A. M. (1990). L’Anthropologie «de terrain»: reconnaissance et interprétation des gestes funéraires. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 2(3), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equality Act. (2010). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents. HM Government.

  • Evison, V. (1994). An Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Great Chesterford, Essex. CBA Research Report 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorato, V., Boylston, A., & Knüsel, C. (Eds.). (2007). Blood red roses. Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, A. P., Laidlaw, M., Cook, B. J., McKinley, J. I., & Wells, N. A. (2001). An unusual early 17th century burial at the Roman villa at Pinglestone Farm, Old Alresford. Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Society, 56, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, J. P., & Marafioti, N. (Eds.). (2014). Capital and corporal punishment in Anglo-Saxon England. Anglo-Saxon Studies 23. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1990 [1963]). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, D. M. (2010). Burying the socially and physically distinctive in Later Anglo Saxon England. In J. Buckberry & A. Cherryson (Eds.), Burial in later Anglo-Saxon England c 650–1100 (pp. 103–115). Oxford: Oxbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, D. M., & Buckberry, J. (2005). Caring for the dead in late Anglo-Saxon England. In F. Tinti (Ed.), Pastoral care in late Anglo-Saxon (pp. 121–147). Boydell: Woodbridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, H. W. (1932). The lame, the halt, and the blind: The vital role of medicine in the history of civilisation. New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inskip, S. A., Taylor, G. M., Zakrzewski, S. R., Mays, S., Pike, A. W. G., Llewellyn, G., et al. (2015). Osteological, biomolecular and geochemical examination of an early Anglo-Saxon case of Lepromatous Leprosy. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0124282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. (2008). Forever young: Child burial in Anglo-Saxon England. In: S. Lewis Simpson (Ed.), Northern world: Youth and age in the medieval north (pp. 17–36). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucy, S. (2000). The Anglo-Saxon way of death. Stroud: Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marafioti, N., & Gates, J. P. (2014). Introduction. In: J. P. Gates & N. Marafioti (Eds.), Capital and corporal punishment in Anglo-Saxon England (pp. 1–16). Anglo-Saxon Studies 23. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masala, C., & Petretto, D. R. (2008). From disablement to enablement: Conceptual models of disability in the 20th century. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1233–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, I. (2006). Disability in medieval Europe: Thinking about physical impairment during the high Middle Ages, c. 1100–1400. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzler, I. (2013). A social history of disability in the middle ages: Cultural considerations of physical impairment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. F. (1990). The body silent. London: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1983). Social work with disabled people. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. (2009). Anglo-Saxon deviant burial customs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robb, J. (2002). Time and biography: Osteobiography of the Italian neolithic lifespan. In Y. Hamilakis, M. Pluciennik, & S. Tarlow (Eds.), Thinking through the body: Archaeologies of corporeality (pp. 153–171). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1999). Disability in the skeletal record: Assumptions, problems and some examples. Archaeological Review from Cambridge, 15, 79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. A. (2000). Did they take sugar? The use of skeletal evidence in the study of disability in past populations. In: J. Hubert (Ed.), Madness, disability and social exclusion (pp. 46–59). One World Archaeology 40. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., & Cox, M. (2003). Health and disease in Britain: From prehistory to the present day. Stroud: Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., & Manchester, K. (1995). The archaeology of disease. Stroud: Alan Sutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothauser, B. C. L. (2007). Winter in Heorot: Looking at Anglo-Saxon perceptions of age and kingship through the character of Hrothgar. In A. Classen (Ed.), Old age in the middle ages and the renaissance: Interdisciplinary approaches to a neglected topic (pp. 103–120). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, D. (2009). Laws, funerals and cemetery organisation: The seventh-century Kentish family. In D. Sayer & H. Williams (Eds.), Mortuary practices and social identities in the middle ages: Essays in burial archaeology in honour of Heinrich Härke (pp. 141–169). Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, F., Lewis, M., & Watts, R. (2015). The lives and deaths of young medieval women: The osteological evidence. Medieval Archaeology, 59, 272–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (2012). The body & social theory. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stodder, A. L. W., & Palkovich, A. M. (Eds.). (2012). The bioarchaeology of individuals. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, N. (1999). The spindle and the spear: A critical enquiry into the construction and meaning of gender in the early Anglo-Saxon burial rite (Vol. 288). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, N. (2002). Multiple burials, multiple meanings? Interpreting the early Anglo-Saxon multiple interment. In S. J. Lucy & A. Reynolds (Eds.), Burial in early medieval England and Wales (pp. 103–121). London: Society for Medieval Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. H. (1967). Medicine in Medieval England. London: Oldbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and Illness contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L., & Cameron, T. (2014). Introducing the index of care: A web-based application supporting archaeological research into health-related care. International Journal of Paleopathology, 6, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, L., & Oxenham, M. F. (2011). Survival against the odds: Modeling the social implications of care provision to seriously disabled individuals. International Journal of Paleopathology, 1(1), 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremain, S. (2002). On the subject of impairment. In M. Corker & T. Shakespeare (Eds.), Disability/postmodernity: Embodying disability theory (pp. 32–47). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrebos, J. (1986). Cleft lip surgery in Anglo-Saxon Britain: The Leech Book (circa AD 920). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 77, 850–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T. (1994a). Counting the dead: The epidemiology of skeletal populations. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T. (1994b). The human remains. In: V. Evison (Ed.), An Anglo-Saxon cemetery at great Chesterford, Essex (pp. 52–66). CBA Research Report 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, T. (2007). Palaeoepidemiology: The measure of disease in the human past. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2011). WHO international classification of functioning. Geneva: Disability and Health (ICF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (2006). Death and memory in early medieval Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (2009). On display: Envisioning the early Anglo-Saxon dead. In D. Sayer & H. Williams (Eds.), Mortuary practices and social identities in the middle ages: Essays in burial archaeology in honour of Heinrich Härke (pp. 170–206). Exeter: University of Exeter Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. W., Milner, G. R., Harpending, H. C., & Weiss, K. M. (1992). The osteological paradox: Problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology, 33(4), 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, L. E., & Yoder, C. J. (2003). Recent progress in bioarchaeology: Approaches to the osteological paradox. Journal of Archaeological Research, 11(1), 43–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakrzewski, S. R. (2014). Palaeopathology, disability and bodily impairments. In R. Metcalfe, J. Cockitt, & R. David (Eds.), Palaeopathology in Egypt and Nubia: A century in review (pp. 57–68). Oxford: Archaeopress Egyptology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakrzewski, S. R. (2015). “Behind every mask there is a face, and behind that a story”. Egyptian bioarchaeology and ancient identities. In: S. Ikram, J. Kaiser, & R. Walker (Eds.), Egyptian bioarchaeology: Humans, animals, and the environment (pp. 157–167). Leiden: Sidestone Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr Simon Mays, Dr Joanna Sofaer and Dr Jo Buckberry for their comments and insightful conversation over our studies of the Great Chesterford cemetery. We would like to thank Dr Kathy Dettwyler for helpful discussions in theorizing and framing this work. And finally our thanks go again to the editors and the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Zakrzewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zakrzewski, S., Evelyn-Wright, S., Inskip, S. (2017). Anglo-Saxon Concepts of Dis/Ability: Placing Disease at Great Chesterford in Its Wider Context. In: Byrnes, J., Muller, J. (eds) Bioarchaeology of Impairment and Disability. Bioarchaeology and Social Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56949-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56949-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56948-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56949-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics