Abstract
Diffuse interface models have become an important analytical and numerical method to model two-phase flows. In this contribution we review the subject and discuss in detail a thermodynamically consistent model with a divergence free velocity field for two-phase flows with different densities. The model is derived using basic thermodynamical principles, its sharp interface limits are stated, existence results are given, different numerical approaches are discussed and computations showing features of the model are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abels, H.: Diffuse interface models for two-phase flows of viscous incompressible fluids. Habilitation thesis, Leipzig (2007)
Abels, H.: Existence of weak solutions for a diffuse interface model for viscous, incompressible fluids with general densities. Commun. Math. Phys. 289, 45–73 (2009)
Abels, H.: On a diffuse interface model for two-phase flows of viscous, incompressible fluids with matched densities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 194, 463–506 (2009)
Abels, H., Breit, D.: Weak solutions for a non-Newtonian diffuse interface model with different densities. Nonlinearity 29, 3426–3453 (2016)
Abels, H., Lengeler, D.: On sharp interface limits for diffuse interface models for two-phase flows. Interfaces Free Bound. 16(3), 395–418 (2014)
Abels, H., Wilke, M.: Convergence to equilibrium for the Cahn-Hilliard equation with a logarithmic free energy. Nonlinear Anal. 67, 3176–3193 (2007)
Abels, H., Garcke, H., Grün, G.: Thermodynamically consistent, frame indifferent diffuse interface models for incompressible two-phase flows with different densities. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22(3), 1150013 (2012)
Abels, H., Depner, D., Garcke, H.: Existence of weak solutions for a diffuse interface model for two-phase flows of incompressible fluids with different densities. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 15(3), 453–480 (2013)
Abels, H., Depner, D., Garcke, H.: On an incompressible Navier-Stokes/Cahn-Hilliard system with degenerate mobility. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 30(6), 1175–1190 (2013)
Abels, H., Garcke, H., Lam, Kei Fong, Weber, J.: Two-phase flow with surfactants: diffuse interface models and their analysis. In: Bothe, D., Reusken, A. (eds.) Transport Processes at Fluidic Interfaces. Springer, Cham (2017)
Abels, H., Liu, Y., Schöttl, A.: Sharp interface limits for diffuse interface models for two-phase flows of viscous incompressible fluids. In: Bothe, D., Reusken, A. (eds.) Transport Processes at Fluidic Interfaces. Springer, Cham (2017)
Aki, G., Dreyer, W., Giesselmann, J., Kraus, C.: A quasi-incompressible diffuse interface model with phase transition. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24, 827–861 (2014)
Alt, H.W.: The entropy principle for interfaces. Fluids and solids. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 2, 585–663 (2009)
Anderson, D.-M., McFadden, G.B., Wheeler,A.A.: Diffuse interface methods in fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 139–165 (1998)
Antanovskii, L.K.: A phase field model of capillarity. Phys. Fluids 7(4), 747–753 (1995)
Armero, F., Simo, J.C.: Formulation of a new class of fractional-step methods for the incompressible mhd equations that retains the long-term dissipativity of the continuum dynamical system. Fields Inst. Commun. 10, 1–24 (1996)
Boyer, F.: Nonhomogeneous Cahn-Hilliard fluids. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 18(2), 225–259 (2001)
Boyer, F.: A theoretical and numerical model for the study of incompressible mixture flows. Comput. Fluids 31, 41–68 (2002)
Brenner, S.C., Scott, L.R.: The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods. Springer, New York (2002)
Cahn, J.W., Hilliard, J.E.: Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28(2), 258–267 (1958)
Campillo-Funollet, E., Grün, G., Klingbeil, F.: On modeling and simulation of electrokinetic phenomena in two-phase flow with general mass densities. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 72(6), 825–854 (2012)
Ding, H., Spelt, P.D.M., Shu, C.: Diffuse interface model for incompressible two-phase flows with large density ratios. J. Comp. Phys. 22, 2078–2095 (2007)
Elliott, C.M., Garcke, H.: Existence results for diffusive surface motion laws. Adv. Math. Sci. Appl. 7(1), 467–490 (1997)
Feng, X.: Fully discrete finite element approximations of the Navier-Stokes-Cahn-Hilliard diffuse interface model for two-phase fluid flows. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 1049–1072 (2006)
Garcke, H., Hinze, M., Kahle, C.: A stable and linear time discretization for a thermodynamically consistent model for two-phase incompressible flow. Appl. Numer. Math. 99, 151–171 (2016)
Grün, G.: On convergent schemes for diffuse interface models for two-phase flow of incompressible fluids with general mass densities. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51(6), 3036–3061 (2013)
Grün, G., Klingbeil, F.: Two-phase flow with mass density contrast: stable schemes for a thermodynamic consistent and frame-indifferent diffuse-interface model. J. Comput. Phys. 257, Part A, 708–725 (2014)
Grün, G., Metzger, S.: On micro-macro models for two-phase flow of dilute polymeric solutions: modeling - analysis - simulation. In: Bothe, D., Reusken, A. (eds.) Transport Processes at Fluidic Interfaces. Springer, Cham (2017)
Grün, G., Guillén-González, F., Metzger, S.: On fully decoupled, convergent schemes for diffuse interface models for two-phase flow with general mass densities. Commun. Comput. Phys. 19(5), 1473–1502 (2016)
Guillén-González, F., Tierra, G.: Splitting schemes for a Navier–Stokes–Cahn–Hilliard model for two fluids with different densities. J. Comput. Math. 32(6), 643–664 (2014)
Gurtin, M.E., Polignone, D., Viñals, J.: Two-phase binary fluids and immiscible fluids described by an order parameter. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 6(6), 815–831 (1996)
Hirth, C.W., Nichols, B.D.: Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comp. Phys. 39, 201–225 (1981)
Hohenberg, P.C., Halperin, B.I.: Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435–479 (1977)
Jacqmin, D.: Calculation of two-phase Navier-Stokes flows using phase-field modeling. J. Comput. Phys. 155, 96–127 (1999)
Kay, D., Styles, V., Welford, R.: Finite element approximation of a Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes system. Interfaces Free Bound. 10, 15–43 (2008)
Kim, J., Kang, K., Lowengrub, J.: Conservative multigrid methods for Cahn-Hilliard fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 193, 511–543 (2004)
Kotschote, M.: Strong solutions for a compressible fluid model of Korteweg type. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 25(4), 679–696 (2008)
Liu, C., Shen, J.: A phase field model for the mixture of two incompressible fluids and its approximation by a Fourier-spectral method. Physica D 179(3–4), 211–228 (2003)
Lowengrub, J., Truskinovsky, L.: Quasi-incompressible Cahn-Hilliard fluids and topological transitions. R. Soc. Lond. Proc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. n454, 2617–2654 (1998)
Minjeaud, S.: An unconditionally stable uncoupled scheme for a triphasic Cahn–Hilliard/Navier-Stokes model. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 29(2), 584–618 (2013)
Sethian, J.A.: Level Set Methods. Evolving Interfaces in Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science. Cambridge Monograph on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Weber, J.: Analysis of diffuse interface models for two-phase flows with and without surfactants. Dissertation thesis, University of Regensburg (2016)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported within the DFG Priority Program 1506 “Transport Processes at Fluidic Interfaces”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Discretization in Space and Time
We assume \(\mathscr{T}_{h}\) to be a quasiuniform triangulation of Ω with simplicial elements in the sense of [19].
Concerning discretization with respect to time, we assume that
- (T):
-
the time interval I: = [0, T) is subdivided in intervals I k = [t k , t k+1) with t k+1 = t k + τ k for time increments τ k > 0 and k = 0, ⋯ , N − 1. For simplicity, we take τ k ≡ τ for k = 0, ⋯ , N − 1.
We write v k for v(⋅ , kτ), \(k \in \mathbb{N}\), and we denote step functions in time mapping I = [0, T] onto one of the discrete function spaces X h , …by an index τh.
For the approximation of both the phase-field φ and the chemical potential μ, we introduce the space U h of continuous, piecewise linear finite element functions on \(\mathscr{T}_{h}\). The expression \(\mathscr{I}_{h}\) stands for the nodal interpolation operator from C 0(Ω) to U h defined by \(\mathscr{I}_{h}u:=\sum _{ j=1}^{\dim U_{h}}u(x_{ j})\theta _{j}\), where the functions θ j form a dual basis to the nodes x j , i.e. θ i (x j ) = δ ij , i, j = 1, …, dimU h .
Let us furthermore introduce the well-known lumped masses scalar product corresponding to the integration formula
For the discretization of the velocity field v and the pressure p, we use function spaces W h ⊂ X h ⊂ W 0 1,2(Ω) and S h ⊂ L 0 2(Ω): = {v ∈ L 2(Ω) | ∫ Ω v = 0} which form an admissible pair of discretization spaces in hydrodynamics. This means that besides the conditions
- (S1):
-
\(\mathbf{W}_{h}:=\{ \mathbf{v}_{h} \in \mathbf{X}_{h}\vert \int _{\varOmega }q_{h}\mathop{ \mathrm{div}}\nolimits \mathbf{v}_{h} = 0\quad \forall q_{h} \in S_{h}\},\)
- (S2):
-
The Babuška-Brezzi condition is satisfied, i.e. a positive constant β exists such that
$$\displaystyle{\sup _{\mathbf{v}_{h}\in \mathbf{X}_{h}}\frac{(q_{h},\mathop{\mathrm{div}}\nolimits \mathbf{v}_{h})} {\left \|\mathbf{v}_{h}\right \|_{\mathbf{W}_{0}^{1,2}(\varOmega )}} \geq \beta \left \|q_{h}\right \|_{L^{2}(\varOmega )}}$$for all q h ∈ S h
a number of additional conditions hold true which are specified in [26] and [29].
Taylor-Hood elements (i.e. P 2 P 1-elements) and P 2 P 0-elements are examples in agreement with these conditions. In both cases, X h is given as
For Taylor-Hood elements, S h is defined to be the subset of functions in U h with vanishing mean value. In the case of P 2 P 0-elements, S h is given by the set of elementwise constant functions with mean value zero. Let us specify the assumptions on initial data and the double-well potential.
Definition 1
Let \(\psi \in C^{1}(\mathbb{R}; \mathbb{R}_{0}^{+})\) be given such that ψ′ is piecewise C 1 with at most quadratic growth of the derivatives for \(\left \vert x\right \vert \rightarrow \infty\). We call \(\psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}} \in C^{0}(\mathbb{R}^{2}; \mathbb{R})\) an admissible discretization of ψ′ if the following is satisfied.
- (H1):
-
There is a positive constant C, such that
$$\displaystyle{ \left \vert \psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}}\left (a,b\right )\right \vert \leq C\left (1 + \left \vert a\right \vert ^{3} + \left \vert b\right \vert ^{3}\right ). }$$ - (H2):
-
\(\psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}}\left (a,b\right )\left (a - b\right ) \geq F\left (a\right ) - F\left (b\right )\) for all \(a,b \in \mathbb{R}\).
- (H3):
-
\(\psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}}\left (a,b\right ) = F'\left (a\right )\) for all \(a \in \mathbb{R}\).
- (H4):
-
There is a positive constant C such that
$$\displaystyle{\left \vert \psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}}(a,b) -\psi _{\tau h}^{{\prime}}(b,c)\right \vert \leq C\left (a^{2} + b^{2} + c^{2}\right )\left (\vert a - b\vert + \vert b - c\vert \right )}$$for all \(a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}.\)
Moreover, we make the following assumptions on initial data and the regularized mass density \(\rho \left (\varphi \right )\).
- (H5):
-
Let initial data Φ 0 ∈ H 2(Ω; [−1, 1]) and \(\mathbf{V}_{0} \in \mathbf{W}_{0,\mathop{\mathrm{div}}\nolimits }^{1,2}(\varOmega )\) be given such that we have for discrete initial data \(\varphi _{h}^{0}:=\mathscr{ I}_{h}\varPhi _{0}\) and v h 0—given by the orthogonal projection of V 0 onto \(\mathscr{W}_{h}\)—uniformly in h > 0 that
$$\displaystyle{\int _{\varOmega }\left \vert \varDelta _{h}\varphi _{h}^{0}\right \vert ^{2} \leq C\left \|\varPhi _{ 0}\right \|_{H^{2}(\varOmega )}^{2}}$$and that
$$\displaystyle{\int _{\varOmega }\rho (\varphi _{h}^{0})\left \vert \mathbf{v}_{ h}^{0}\right \vert ^{2} + \frac{1} {2}\int _{\varOmega }\left \vert \nabla \varphi _{h}^{0}\right \vert ^{2} +\int _{\varOmega }\mathscr{I}_{ h}F(\varphi _{h}^{0}) \leq C\mathscr{E}(\mathbf{V}_{ 0},\varPhi _{0}).}$$Here, the discrete Laplacian Δ h w ∈ U h ∩ H ∗ 1(Ω) is defined by
$$\displaystyle{ \left (\varDelta _{h}w,\varTheta \right )_{h} = -\int _{\varOmega }\langle \nabla w,\nabla \varTheta \rangle \quad \forall \varTheta \in U_{h}. }$$(8.45) - (H6):
-
Given mass densities \(0 <\tilde{\rho } _{-}\leq \tilde{\rho }_{+} \in \mathbb{R}\) of the fluids involved and an arbitrary, but fixed regularization parameter \(\bar{\varphi }\in \left ( \frac{\tilde{\rho }_{-}} {\tilde{\rho }_{+}-\tilde{\rho }_{-}}, \frac{2\tilde{\rho }_{-}} {\tilde{\rho }_{+}-\tilde{\rho }_{-}}\right )\), we define the regularized mass density of the two-phase fluid by a smooth, increasing, strictly positive function ρ of the phase-field φ which satisfies
$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \rho (\varphi )\vert _{(-1-\bar{\varphi },1+\bar{\varphi })} = \frac{\tilde{\rho }_{+} -\tilde{\rho }_{+}} {2} \varphi + \frac{\tilde{\rho }_{-} +\tilde{\rho } _{+}} {2},& & {}\end{array}$$(8.46)$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \rho (\varphi )\vert _{(-\infty,-1- \frac{2\tilde{\rho }_{-}} {\tilde{\rho }_{+}-\tilde{\rho }_{-}})} \equiv const.,& & {}\end{array}$$(8.47)$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \rho (\varphi )\vert _{(1+ \frac{2\tilde{\rho }_{-}} {\tilde{\rho }_{+}-\tilde{\rho }_{-}},\infty )} \equiv const..& & {}\end{array}$$(8.48)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abels, H., Garcke, H., Grün, G., Metzger, S. (2017). Diffuse Interface Models for Incompressible Two-Phase Flows with Different Densities. In: Bothe, D., Reusken, A. (eds) Transport Processes at Fluidic Interfaces. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56602-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56602-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56601-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56602-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)