Skip to main content

Community Structures Evaluation in Complex Networks: A Descriptive Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3rd International Winter School and Conference on Network Science (NetSci-X 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Evaluating a network partition just only via conventional quality metrics—such as modularity, conductance or normalized mutual of information—is usually insufficient. Indeed, global quality scores of a network partition or its clusters do not provide many ideas about their structural characteristics. Furthermore, quality metrics often fail to reach an agreement especially in networks whose modular structures are not very obvious. Evaluating the goodness of network partitions in function of desired structural properties is still a challenge. Here, we propose a methodology that allows one to expose structural information of clusters in a network partition in a comprehensive way, thus eventually helps one to compare communities identified by different community detection methods. This descriptive approach also helps to clarify the composition of communities in real-world networks. The methodology hence bring us a step closer to the understanding of modular structures in complex networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almeida, H., Guedes, D., Meira Jr., W., Zaki, M.J.: Is there a best quality metric for graph clusters? In: Gunopulos, D., et al. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6911, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286 (5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., Moore, C.: Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 066111 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Creusefond, J., Largillier, T., Peyronnet, S.: On the evaluation potential of quality functions in community detection for different contexts. In: Advances in Network Science: 12th International Conference and School, NetSci-X (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., Faloutsos, C.: On power-law relationships of the internet topology. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, pp. 251–262 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fire, M., Tenenboim, L., Lesser, O., Puzis, R., Rokach, L., Elovici, Y.,: Link prediction in social networks using computationally efficient topological features. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 73–80 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Girvan, M. and Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Guimerà, R., Amaral, L.A.N.: Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2005, P02001 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guimerà, R., Amaral, L.A.N.: Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Lett. Nat. 7028, 895–900 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Leskovec, J., Krevl, A.: SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data (2014). Reference date: 13/12/2016

  11. Newman, M.E., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69 (2), 026113 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravasz, E., Somera, A.L., Mongru, D.A., Oltvai, Z.N., Barabási, A.-L.: Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297 (5586), 1551–1555 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, J., Leskovec, J.: Defining and evaluating network communities based on ground-truth. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 42, 181–213 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10115-013-0693-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yook, S.H., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L.: Modeling the Internet’s large-scale topology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 13382–13386 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinh-Loc Dao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dao, VL., Bothorel, C., Lenca, P. (2017). Community Structures Evaluation in Complex Networks: A Descriptive Approach. In: Shmueli, E., Barzel, B., Puzis, R. (eds) 3rd International Winter School and Conference on Network Science . NetSci-X 2017. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55471-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics