Skip to main content

What Is Science Diplomacy?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science and Diplomacy

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

Abstract

When we speak of science diplomacy, we use a vocabulary that did not exist prior to the present millennium. We also deal with an issue which has tended to be of recent interest these days, so we will try to specify the meaning being given to this concept. But behind the new vocabulary, science diplomacy appears to be rooted in the distant past: history gives evidence of ancient ties between science and foreign policy. This chapter, both conceptual and historical, is guided by this question: what is science diplomacy?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As part of an interview reported in “Science as a tool for international diplomacy”, http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/30532_en.html. V. Turekian was formerly the Chief International Officer at the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the editor-in-chief of the quarterly journal Science & Diplomacy, launched in 2012. In September 2015, he was named the 5th Science and Technology Adviser to the Secretary of State.

  2. 2.

    Yet the combination of science to non-military objectives of foreign policy—in today’s language, “Science for diplomacy”—has already been studied, notably with respect to the Cold War period (Doel and Wang 2002; Doel 1997).

  3. 3.

    Another political voice was added in 2009 when the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown called on science to play a new role in international politics and diplomacy: “It is important that we create a new role for science in international policymaking and diplomacy … to place science at the heart of the progressive international agenda”. This quote opens the Royal Society-AAAS report.

  4. 4.

    This statement was made during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on 13 January, 2009.

  5. 5.

    However, researchers could be associated informally with diplomatic efforts in the so-called “Track II Diplomacy”. The Cold War period offers several examples.

  6. 6.

    This treaty covers the prohibition of nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water.

  7. 7.

    This is clearly evidenced by the historian Ronald E. Doel (1997).

  8. 8.

    An equivalent center was created in parallel in Ukraine.

  9. 9.

    Article 2 of the 27 November 1992 agreement establishing the International Science and Technology Center.

  10. 10.

    As well as Canada, which later on withdrew from the organization.

  11. 11.

    Dismantling arsenals was the other side of the clearance of the Cold War books: at the G8 Summit in Kananaskis (Canada) in June 2002, the Global Partnership against the Spread of Weapons and Materials of Mass Destruction (G8GP) was launched. Originally focused on countries of the former Soviet Union, in one decade it was able to dismantle more than 180 nuclear submarines, destroy thousands of tons of chemical weapons and secure thousands of radioactive sources.

References

  • Beaucour, F. 1970. L’Institut d’Egypte et ses travaux. Souvenir Napoléonien 255: 11–13. http://www.napoleon.org

  • Blais, H. 2004. Le rôle de l’Académie des sciences dans les voyages d’exploration au XIXe siècle. La revue pour l’histoire du CNRS 10. http://histoire-cnrs.revues.org/587

  • Chouiki, M. 2008. La géographie coloniale: engagement politique et flou identitaire—Le cas marocain. In L’empire des géographes—Géographie, exploration et colonisation XIXe-XXe siècle, ed. P. Singaravélou, 112–123. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, D. 2011. Science Diplomacy: What’s It All About? CEPI-CIPS Policy Brief 13. http://cips.uottawa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Copeland-Policy-Brief-Nov-11-5.pdf

  • Darcos, X. 2011. La diplomatie culturelle est un enjeu vital. L’Express, December 12. http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/monde/xavier-darcos-la-diplomatie-culturelle-est-un-enjeu-vital_1060563.html

  • Delcorde, R. 2005. Les mots de la diplomatie. Paris: L’Harmattan. 133 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of State–USAID. 2010. Leading Through Civilian Power—The First Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, 219 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, R.E. 1997. Scientists as Policy Makers, Advisors and Intelligence Agents: Linking Contemporary Diplomatic History with the History of Contemporary Science. In The Historiography of Contemporary Science and Technology, ed. T. Sőderqvist, 215–224. Reading: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doel, R.E., and Z. Wang. 2002. Science and Technology. In Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy, ed. A. De Conde, R. Dean Burns, and F. Logevall, 443–459. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, J.-M. 2003. Les grands voyages scientifiques au siècle des Lumières. Paris: Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle—Centre Alexandre Koyré. 25 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedoroff, N. 2009, January 9. Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Cell 136(1): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucher, M. 2013. Puissance et influence. Repère et référence. In Atlas de l’influence française au XXIème siècle, ed. M. Foucher, 10–17. Paris: Robert Laffont/Institut français.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J. 2011. Backdoor Diplomacy: How U.S. Scientists Reach Out to Frenemies. innovationnewsdaily, April 8. http://www.innovationnewsdaily.com/196-science-diplomacy-soft-power.html

  • Klein, J.-F. 2008. La Société de géographie de Lyon: pour la Croix et la soie ? (1873–1900). In L’empire des géographes—Géographie, exploration et colonisation XIXe-XXe siècle, ed. P. Singaravélou, 91–109. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P. 2016. Présence française dans le monde—L’action culturelle et scientifique. Paris: La Documentation française. 128 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, M. 2011. L’ENA, outil du soft power à la française. In Enjeux et vecteurs de la diplomatie d’influence. Mondes–Les Cahiers du Quai d’Orsay 9: 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. 2010. Science and Technology in China: A Roadmap to 2050—Strategic General Report of the Chinese Academy of Science. Beijing and Heidelberg: Science Press and Springer. 138 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pestre, D. 2004. Le nouvel univers des sciences et des techniques: une proposition générale. In Les sciences pour la guerre: 1940–1960, ed. A. Dahanand and D. Pestre, 11–47. Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenzer, N. 2012. L’influence des grandes puissances dans le monde et leurs stratégies pour l’avenir. Mondes–Les Cahiers du Quai d’Orsay 9: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. 2010. National Security Strategy, 52 p. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss__viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ruffini, PB. (2017). What Is Science Diplomacy?. In: Science and Diplomacy. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55104-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics