Abstract
Geneva, 19 November 1985. Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan met for the first time. During this summit mainly devoted to disarmament, the Soviet leader proposed to his American counterpart an ambitious program of research and experimentation on a subject on which scientists of his country had been devoting much attention for years: verifying the scientific and technological feasibility of nuclear fusion as a new source of energy. Very consistent with the detente and cooling of tensions in the post-Cold War world, this proposal for a peaceful use of nuclear energy had considerable symbolic meaning. More importantly, it had huge prospects for controlling the process of nuclear fusion in order to produce clean and virtually limitless energy from abundant elements in nature, provided a long-term scientific investment was made. The following year, the United States, the European Union and Japan agreed to join the Soviet Union and conduct this program, whose economic reach, if successful, would be considerable: the ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) was born. Later, China, India and South Korea joined the adventure. On 17 November 2010, the foundation stone of the experimental reactor was laid in France on the Cadarache site.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We will refer to this text as the “Royal Society-AAAS report”.
- 2.
- 3.
The cost of construction of the reactor is estimated at around 19 billion euros. The operational phase is expected to start in the late 2020s.
- 4.
This diplomatic shift was also pursuing another goal: counteract the depletion of intake of students and young researchers from developing countries which followed the tightening of immigration policy under Patriot Act of 26 October 2001, and which was detrimental to research activity in the United States.
- 5.
J.-J. Salomon (2006, p. 237) notes that “on the European continent, the very concept of science (Wissenschaft in Germany or nauka in Russia) has always included the social sciences and humanities”, while “in the Anglo-Saxon world, the policy of natural sciences is separate from that which affects the social sciences…”.
- 6.
These percentages relate to publications in science and engineering.
- 7.
Articles co written by authors from more than one region are accounted for in each of them, therefore the total of regional shares exceeds 100%. All figures in this paragraph are from UNESCO (2015), op.cit.
- 8.
The use of the armed forces and economic pressures are the other two major instruments of foreign policy.
- 9.
The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations was adopted on 18 April 1961 and entered into force on 24 April 1964. In 2015, 190 countries were signatory.
- 10.
There is, however, an embryonic diplomacy at the level of the European Union.
- 11.
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.
- 12.
A recent exception is the collection of contributions co-edited by L. S. Davis and R. G. Patman in 2015.
- 13.
The list is given in the Acknowledgement.
References
Davis, L.S., and R.G. Patman. 2015. Science Diplomacy—New Day or False Dawn? Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. 278 p.
Delcorde, R. 2005. Les mots de la diplomatie. Paris: L’Harmattan. 133 p.
———. 2009. L’évolution du métier de diplomate, vol. 10, Annuaire Français de Relations Internationales. Paris: Centre Thucydide—Analyse et recherche en relations internationales. 12 p. http://www.afri-ct.org
Foucher, M. 2013. Puissance et influence. Repère et référence. In Atlas de l’influence française au XXIème siècle, ed. M. Foucher, 10–17. Paris: Robert Laffont/Institut français.
Hocking, B., J. Melissen, S. Riordan, and P. Sharp. 2012. Futures for Diplomacy—Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. The Hague: Netherland Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”. 78 p.
Khanna, P. 2011. How to Run the World. New York: Random House. 272 p.
Kurbalija, J., and V. Katrandjiev. 2006. Multistakeholder Diplomacy—Challenges and Opportunities. Malta: Diplo Foundation. 204 p.
Merton, R.K. 1942/1973. The Normative Structure of Science. In Robert K. Merton—The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. N.W. Storer, 267–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
National Science Board. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. 592 p. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/seind12.pdf
———. 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. 898 p. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/
Nye, J. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books. 307 p.
———. 2004. Soft Power—The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. 191 p.
Royal Society and American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2010. New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power? 32 p. http://diplomacy.aaas.org/files/New_Frontiers.pdf
Salomon, J.-J. 2006. Les scientifiques entre pouvoir et savoir. Paris: Albin Michel. 435 p.
UNESCO. 2015. UNESCO Science Report—Toward 2030. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. 820 p.
Van Bergeijk, P.A.G. 2009. Economic Diplomacy and the Geography of International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 240 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruffini, PB. (2017). Introduction. In: Science and Diplomacy. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55104-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55104-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55103-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55104-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)