Skip to main content

Collaboration to Promote Use of Community Indicators: Communication Is Key

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII

Part of the book series: Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being ((CQLWB))

  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

To play a meaningful role in quality-of-life efforts, organizations managing indicators initiatives must collaborate with others. After summarizing evidence-based factors that influence the success of collaboration, the chapter highlights factors of greatest potential interest to community indicators initiatives: Mutual understanding and trust, members see the collaboration as in their self-interest, multiple layers of participation, appropriate cross-section of members, and open and frequent communication. These factors are then explored through a case study of the community indicators project that we operate, Minnesota Compass. Finally, we end by outlining a tactical approach to communications and outreach that reinforces collaboration—and helps to ensure the use of indicators toward the broader goal of increasing overall quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Auspos and Cabaj (2014), Kania and Kramer (2011).

  2. 2.

    See Mattessich et al. (2001) for a description of the meta-analytic procedures used to identify the factors. Note also that Wilder Research is currently updating the meta-analysis of research on collaboration, with the intent to publish updated findings during 2016. The new edition includes expanded content describing how to apply the research-based factors in increasingly diverse 21st Century communities.

References

  • Auspos, P., & Cabaj, M. (2014). Complexity and community change: Managing adaptively to improve effectiveness. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011, Winter). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work (2nd ed.). Chicago: Turner Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig Helmstetter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helmstetter, C., Mattessich, P., Hamberg, R., Hartzler, N. (2017). Collaboration to Promote Use of Community Indicators: Communication Is Key. In: Holden, M., Phillips, R., Stevens, C. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54617-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54618-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics