Abstract
One important objective of community indicator initiatives, often explicit in their title or mandate, is to assess overall well-being, life quality, or social progress. These concepts are increasingly becoming accountable to the evaluation survey respondents give when asked about how their life feels, overall. Such quantitative, subjective data are not directly useful for guiding policy, but statistical analysis based on these subjective well-being data can now be used to guide the choice of indicators in a community indicator system, and can even provide weights to use in calculating a summary index for a set of seemingly unrelated indicator measures. This chapter uses a database of 82 indicator initiatives implemented since the 1970s from 30 countries, and at all geographic scales, to assess trends in the structure, content, and success of attempts to measure human flourishing or life quality. Based on a taxonomy that encompasses unaggregated dashboards of indicators, money-denominated accounts, other indices (composite indicators), and measures oriented around subjective well-being, the database suggests that unaggregated and subjective-well-being-oriented indicator initiatives are more successful in terms of their longevity. Moreover, in the interest of accessibility, transparency, accountability, and the assurance of relevance, the construction of indices should only be carried out when quantitatively guided by the analysis of subjective well-being data. Relying on subjective well-being in this way provides an intuitive, compelling headline indicator or synthetic index, supported by a set of policy-amenable indicators whose inclusion is accountable to the actual experience of citizens.
This chapter is adapted from a longer review to be published in Social Indicators Research, and benefits from some additional research assistance carried out by Julianne Skarha. I am grateful for feedback from the editors and from participants of the 2016 CIC Impact Summit. The work was supported by funding from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada grant 435-2016-0531.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barrington-Leigh, C., & Escande, A. (2016). Measuring progress and well-being: A comparative review of indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1505-0
Bernanke, B. S. (2010). The economics of happiness. www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20100508a.htm. Visited on December 2011.
Bigot, R., Croutte, P., Daudey, E., Hoibian, S., & Müller, J. (2012). L’évolution du bien-être en France depuis 30 ans.
Cameron, D. (2010). A transcript of a speech given by the Prime Minister on wellbeing on 25 November. http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pm-speech-on-well-being (visited on 12/2011).
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.
Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Office for National Statistics Paper.
Exton, C., Smith, C., & Vandendriessche, D. (2015). Comparing happiness across the world: Does culture matter? OECD Statistics Working Papers. doi:10.1787/5jrqppzd9bs2-en
Hall, J., Barrington-Leigh, C., & Helliwell, J. (2011). Cutting through the clutter: Searching for an over-arching measure of well-being. CESifo DICE Report, 8(4), 8–12.
Hall, J., & Rickard, L. (2013). People, progress and participation: How initiatives measuring social progress yield benefits beyond better metrics. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Helliwell, J. F., et al. (2010). International evidence on the social context of well-being. In E. Diener, J. F. Helliwell, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), International differences in well-being (pp. 213–229). Oxford University Press.
Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. http://worldhappiness.report/ed/2012/
Human Development Report Office. (2013). Human Development Report 2013: Technical Notes. Technical Report, pp. 1–8.
Lind, N. (2014). Legatum Prosperity Index. In: Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3529–3530). Springer.
Michalos, A., et al. (2011). Technical Report 1.0. Waterloo, ON: The Canadian Index of Wellbeing and University of Waterloo.
Neumayer, E. (1999). The ISEW—Not an index of sustainable economic welfare. Social Indicators Research, 48(1), 77–101. issn: 0303-8300. doi:10.1023/A:1006914023227
OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being.
OECD. (2015). How’s life?: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). Better life initiative: Measuring well-being and progress. http://www.oecd.org/ progress. Visited on March 2016.
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342. issn: 1467-6494. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.
Stone, A. A, Mackie, C., et al. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2005). The Economist Intelligence Unit quality-of-life index. The Economist.
UK Office of National Statistics. (2011). National statistician’s reflections on the national Debate on measuring national well-being. eprint: www.ons.gov.uk. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/wellbeing-knowledgebank/understanding-wellbeing/measuring-what-matters–national-statistician-sreflections-on-the-national-debate-on-measuring-national-well-being.pdf. Visited on December 2011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrington-Leigh, C. (2017). The Role of Subjective Well-Being as an Organizing Concept for Community Indicators. In: Holden, M., Phillips, R., Stevens, C. (eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII. Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54617-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54618-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)