Abstract
This chapter discusses surface transportation applications, space applications, and medical applications in detail. It extends the discussion from Chap. 3 where we considered a broader variety of application domains and their relation to dependability. The choice of these applications is due to expertise of the authors and positioning of these applications in the overall dependability palette as ones of the most challenging yet different from each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
C. Hernandez, J. Abella, Timely error detection for effective recovery in light-lockstep automotive systems, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 34(11), 1718–1729 (2015)
MICROSAR Safe: Safety According to ISO 26262 up to ASIL D—Compatible with AUTOSAR. https://www.tttech.com/products/automotive/autosar-safety-software/microsar-safe/. Accessed 7 July 2016
V. Izosimov, Scheduling and optimization of fault-tolerant distributed embedded systems. Doctor Thesis No. 1290, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Sweden (2009)
G. Lagunoff, BorgWarner eAWD. http://hybridfordonscentrum.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/20140404_BorgWarner.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2016
AUTOSAR 4.0. https://www.autosar.org/specifications/release-40/. Accessed 7 July 2016
ISO 26262:2011 Road vehicles—Functional safety (2011)
D. Reinhardt, G. Morgan, An embedded hypervisor for safety-relevant automotive E/E-systems, in 9th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems (SIES 2014) (2014)
What is Docker? https://www.docker.com/what-docker. Accessed 7 July 2016
V. Izosimov, G. Di Guglielmo, M. Lora, G. Pravadelli, F. Fummi, Z. Peng, M. Fujita, Time-constraint-aware optimization of assertions in embedded software. J. Electron. Test. Theory Appl. (JETTA) 28(4), 469–486 (2012)
V. Izosimov, I. Polian, P. Pop, P. Eles, Z. Peng, Analysis and optimization of fault-tolerant embedded systems with hardened processors, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE 2009) (Nice, France, 2009), pp. 682–687
E. Dubrova, Fault-Tolerant Design (Springer, 2013)
V. Izosimov, A. Asvestopoulos, O. Blomkvist, M. Törngren, Security-aware development of cyber-physical systems illustrated with automotive case study, in Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE 2016) (2016), pp. 818–821
AEC-Q100/AEC-Q200—Automotive Electronics Council. http://www.aecouncil.com/AECDocuments.html. Accessed 7 July 2016
ZVEI, Handbook for Robustness Validation of Semiconductor Devices in Automotive Applications. http://www.zvei.org/Publikationen/Robustness-Validation-Semiconductor-2015.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2016
G. Jerke, A.B. Kahng, Mission profile aware IC design—A case study, in Design Automation and Test in Europe (DATE 2014) (Dresden, 2014), pp. 1–6
EN 50126-1 Railway applications—The specification and demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS)—Part 1: Basic requirements and generic process
EN 50128 Railway applications—Communications, signalling and processing systems—Software for railway control and protection systems
EN 50129 Railway applications—Communication, signalling and processing systems—Application Guide for EN 50129—Part 1: Cross-acceptance
R.D. Schrimpf, D.M. Fleetwood (eds.), Radiation Effects and Soft Errors in Integrated Circuits and Electronic Devices (World Scientific, Singapore, 2004)
ECSS-E-HB-10-12A, Space engineering, Calculation of radiation and its effects and margin policy handbook
ECSS-Q-ST-30C, Space product assurance—Dependability
ECSS-Q-ST-40C, Space product assurance—Safety
R. Trautner, ESA’S roadmap for next generation payload data processors, in Proceedings of the 2011 Data Systems In Aerospace (DASIA) (Malta, 2011)
ESA Round Table Synthesis, Next Generation Processor for On-board Payload Data Processing Application (2007)
ECSS-Q-HB-60-02A DIR2.6, DRAFT, 30, Space engineering, product assurance—Techniques for Radiation Effects Mitigation in ASICs and FPGAs, October (2015)
P.J. Pingree, Advancing NASA’s on-board processing capabilities with reconfigurable FPGA technologies: opp & implications, in IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (IPDPSW), April (2010)
B. Fiiethe et al., Adaptive hardware by dynamic reconfiguration for the Solar Orbiter PHI instrument, in Proceedings of the NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware Systems, June (2012)
F. Bubenhagen et al., Enhanced dynamic reconfigurable processing module for future space applications, in Proceedings of the International Space Wire Conference (ISC) (2010)
F. Dittmann et al., Implementation of a dynamically reconfigurable processing module for SpaceWire Networks, in Proceedings of the International Space Wire Conference (ISC) (2010)
D.F. McAllister, D.F. Nagle, Toward a fault-tolerant processor for medical applications, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Engineering of Computer-Based Medical Systems (1988), pp. 101–104
D.R. Wallace, D.R. Kuhn, Lessons from 342 medical device failures, in 4th IEEE International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering (1999), pp. 123–131
S. Bak et al., The system-level simplex architecture for improved real-time embedded system safety, in Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium (2009), pp. 99–107
A. Maheshwari, W. Burleson, R. Tessier, Trading off transient fault tolerance and power consumption in deep submicron (DSM) VLSI circuits. IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 12(3) (2004)
K. Chakrabarty, F. Su, Design of fault-tolerant and dynamically-reconfigurable microfluidic biochips, in DATe 2005, vol. 2 (2005), pp. 1202–1207
N. Xiong et al., Comparative analysis of quality of service and memory usage for adaptive failure detectors in healthcare systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 27(4), 495–509 (2009)
R.M. Seepers, C. Strydis, G.N. Gaydadjiev, Architecture-level fault-tolerance for biomedical implants, in International Conference on Embedded Computer Systems (SAMOS) (2012), pp. 1202–1207
S. Patel, H. Park, P. Bonato, L. Chan, M. Rodgers, A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 9, 21 (2012)
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank Christos Strydis, Ioannis Sourdis, Jørgen Ilstad and Oliver Bringmann for their valuable contributions during preparation of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Izosimov, V., Paschalis, A., Reviriego, P., Manhaeve, H. (2018). Application-Specific Solutions. In: Ottavi, M., Gizopoulos, D., Pontarelli, S. (eds) Dependable Multicore Architectures at Nanoscale. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54422-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54422-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54421-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54422-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)