Skip to main content
  • 631 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 5 shows that rural minority migrants moving to urban areas in China and India are not always poor as is often believed. At times, they may be less poor than the local residents because they tend to be better educated and economically better-off at the time of migration. However, there are differences between the countries in some respects. For example, in China employers provide housing to migrants and the government subsidizes their cost of migration, whereas the Indian employers and the government do not. Remittances of migrants are far more important in raising living standards of Indian minority migrants (especially Muslims) than they are in China. In general, rural-to-urban migration tends to improve livelihood of minorities in both countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. H., Jr., & Page, J. (2005, October 10). Do international migration and remittances reduce poverty in developing countries? World Development, 33(10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, J. (1994). Seasonal migration and cooperative capitalism: Crushing of cane and labour by sugar factories in Bardoli. In J. Breman (Ed.), Wage hunters and gatherers. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremen, J. (1996). Footloose labour: Working in India’s informal sector. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cassimiliano, C., & Menon, C. (2013). Does urbanization affect rural poverty? Evidence from Indian districts. World Bank Economic Review, 27(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS). (2002). Household Survey 2002. Beijing: CASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshingkar, P. (2010). Migration, remote rural areas and chronic poverty in India (Overseas Development Institute (ODI) Working Paper 323 (CPRC Working Paper 163)). London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, J. (2010). Poverty reduction in China and India: Policy implications of recent trends (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Working Paper No. 92) (ST/ESA/2010/DWP/92).

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of China (GOC). (2015). Survey report on migrant workers. Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI) Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2010). National Sample Survey (NSS) 64th round on migration in India 2007–2008. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI), Cabinet Secretariat. (2006, November). Social, economic and educational status of the Muslim community in India: A report of the prime minister’s High Level Committee (chaired by Rajinder Sachar). New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2001). Migration in India, 1999–2000, NSS 55th round, Report No. 470. New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (GOI), Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. (2009). INDIA: Urban poverty report. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, I., & Mitra, A. (2002, January 12–18). Rural migrants and labour segmentation: Micro-level evidence from Delhi slums. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B., & Ding, S. (2014, December). Why is there no income gap between the Hui Muslim minority and the Han majority in rural Ningxia, China? China Quarterly, 220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B., & Yang, X. (2015). Are China’s ethnic minorities less likely to move? Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasmath, R., & Ho, B. (2015). Job acquisition, retention and outcomes for ethnic minorities in urban China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 56(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Joe, W., Samaiyar, P., & Mishra, U. S. (2009, September). Migration and urban poverty in India: Some preliminary observations (Centre for Development Studies (CDS) Working Paper No. 414). Trivandrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. R. (2008). Growth, inequality and poverty: A comparative study of China’s experience in the periods before and after the Asian crisis. In B. Gustafsson, S. Li, & T. Sicular (Eds.), Inequality and public policy in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. R. (2009). Inequality and poverty in China in the post-reform period: An overview. In M. Sanyal, M. Sanyal, & S. Amin (Eds.), Post-reform development in Asia: Essays for Amiya Kumar Bagchi. Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. R., & Riskin, C. (2005, June). China’s household income and its distribution, 1995 and 2002. China Quarterly, 182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A., & Sarangi, N. (2007, January). Migration, employment status and poverty—An analysis across urban centres. Economic and Political Weekly, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1980). Migration from rural areas of poor countries: The impact on rural productivity and income distribution. World Development, 8(227).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. T. (2009). Analysis of migration of the minorities from north-eastern region in the process of urbanisation. Manchu Minority Research (manzuyanjiu), 1(94).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevia, D., Liu, Z., & Yuan, Z. (2010, April). Housing options and mobility of urban migrants in India and China. Ahmedabad: Centre for Urban Equity at the Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, A. (2010). Migration, livelihood, and well-being: Evidence from Indian city slums. Urban Studies, 47(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, C. S., Reddy, S. N., Subramahnyam, S., Saravanan, V., & Babu, K. S. (2004). Sustainable tribal development project of care Vishakhapatnam: Baseline survey. Hyderabad: Centre for Economic and Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narain, U., Gupta, S., & Van der Veld, K. (2005). Poverty and environment: Exploring the relationship between household incomes, private assets and natural assets (Working Paper 134). Delhi: Delhi School of Economics, Centre for Development Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, W., & Ramanamurthy, R. V. (2000). Contract labour and bondage in Andhra Pradesh (India). Journal of Social and Political Thought, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, X. J., & Ba, C. S. (2011). Urbanization process of the minority population in China. Journal of Yanshan University. Philosophy and Social Science Edition, 12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad-Aleyamma, M. (2011). Caste, ethnicity and migration: Linking recruitment and labour process. In S. I. Rajan (Ed.), Migration, identity and conflict. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, S. I. (2013). Internal migration of youth in India: Main features, trends and emerging challenges. Discussion Paper, UNESCO New Delhi Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastva, R. (2012, October). Internal migration in India: An overview of its features, trends and policy challenges. In UNESCO/UNICEF National Workshop on Internal Migration and Human Development in India, Workshop Compendium, vol. 2, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S. (2014). Tackling social exclusion and marginality for poverty reduction: Indian experiences. In J. von Braun & F. W. Gatzweiler (Eds.), Marginality: Addressing the nexus of poverty, exclusion and ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S., Bannerjee, A., Mishra, V. K., & Rizvi, F. (2015, June). Urban rental housing market: Caste and religion matters in access. Economic and Political Weekly, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumbe, C. (2011) Remittances in India: Facts and issues (Institute of Management Working Paper No. 331). Bangalore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vakulabharanam, V., & Thakurata, S. G. (2014). Why do migrants do better than non-migrants at destination in India? Migration, class and inequality dynamics. Singapore Economic Review, 59(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (various years). World development report. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariah, K. C., & Rajan, S. I. (2016, February). Kerala migration study 2014. Economic and Political Weekly, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. Y., & Zeng, M. X. (2005). Study of the distribution and migration of the minority population—Based on the fifth national population census (in Chinese). Nationality Studies (mizuyanjiu), 1, 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Lin, L. (2010). The mobility patterns of rural-urban migrants and their social protection in China: Beyond the extension of urban-based approaches (Working Paper of the Special Protection Agency in Asia (SPA)). Institute of Human Development New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Bhalla .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bhalla, A.S., Luo, D. (2017). Minority Migrants. In: Poverty and Exclusion of Minorities in China and India. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53937-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53937-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53936-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53937-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics