Skip to main content

Postscript

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On Reasoning and Argument

Part of the book series: Argumentation Library ((ARGA,volume 30))

  • 1363 Accesses

Abstract

The deductive-inductive distinction and the linked-convergent distinction apply primarily to support of conclusions by premisses. Such support is conclusive if and only if the argument has a true or otherwise acceptable covering generalization that supports counterfactual instances. Probabilification is only one type of non-conclusive support. To determine whether and how the premisses of an argument support its conclusion, it is best to make minimal changes and additions to the stated argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In citing Aristotle, I use the translations in (Aristotle 1984 [4th century BCE]).

  2. 2.

    I thank Derek Allen for drawing three of these respects to my attention.

References

  • Aristotle. 1984. The complete works of Aristotle: The revised Oxford translation, ed. Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols. Bollingen Series 71. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Greek original written in the 4th century BCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, Robert H. 2001. Argument appraisal strategy: A comprehensive approach. Informal Logic 21(2): 97–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddu, G. C. 2001. The ‘most important and fundamental’ distinction in logic Informal Logic 21(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, David. 1998. Does the traditional treatment of enthymemes rest on a mistake? Argumentation 12: 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hitchcock .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hitchcock, D. (2017). Postscript. In: On Reasoning and Argument. Argumentation Library, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics