Abstract
With the advent of the industrial age, asbestos’ unique properties, including its resistance to fire, tensile strength, softness and flexibility, resulted in its widespread commercial use. Decades later, its usage was shown to have tragic medical consequences, as these fibrous minerals became causally linked to malignant mesothelioma and other debilitating diseases. Malignant mesotheliomas are aggressive tumors that arise from serous membranes, such as the pleura and the peritoneum. Mesothelioma has a dismal prognosis due to its inherent chemo- and radio-resistance as well as to the general ineffectiveness of surgical intervention. Mesotheliomas account for approximately 3200 deaths per year in the USA, with more than 450,000 deaths predicted over the next 40 years in the USA, Europe, Australia, and Japan. Legal compensation alone is projected to amount to hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide over this time span, and this already enormous figure does not include health care costs. Currently, about 125 million people worldwide are exposed to asbestos in the workplace. Given such continued exposure to asbestos fibers, there is thus great public, medical, and legal interest in this malignancy. This introduction provides a general overview of the mesothelioma burden and a brief outline about the contents of this monograph, which includes a multidisciplinary assessment of the characteristics of asbestos along with the epidemiology, cell biology, pathology, and treatment of mesothelioma. Psychological aspects and legal challenges facing mesothelioma patients and their families are also presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alleman JE, Mossman BT (1997) Asbestos revisited. Sci Am 277:70–75
Barrett JC, Lamb PW, Wiseman RW (1989) Multiple mechanisms for the carcinogenic effects of asbestos and other mineral fibers. Environ Health Perspect 81:81–89.
Burki T (2010) Health experts concerned over India’s asbestos industry. Lancet 375:626–627
Carbone C, Ly BH, Dodson RF et al (2012) Malignant mesothelioma: facts, myths and hypotheses. J Cell Physiol 227:44–58
Henley SJ, Larson TC, Wu M et al (2013) Mesothelioma incidence in 50 states and the district of Columbia, U.S., 2003–2008. Int J Occup Environ Health 19:1–10
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2009) Chrysolite, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite, and anthophyllite. In: IARC monographs. arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 147–167
Ismail-Khan R, Robinson LA, Williams CC Jr et al (2006) Malignant pleural mesothelioma: a comprehensive review. Cancer Control 13:255–263
Kindler HL (2013) Peritoneal mesothelioma: the site of origin matters. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 33:182–188
Magnani C, Dalmasso P, Biggeri A et al (2001) Increased risk of malignant mesothelioma of the pleura after residential or domestic exposure to asbestos: a case-control study in Casale Monferrato, Italy. Environ Health Perspect 109:915–919
Mirarabshahii P, Pillai K, Chua TC et al (2012) Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma—an update on treatment. Cancer Treat Rev 38:605–612
Musti M, Pollice A, Cavone D et al (2009) The relationship between malignant mesothelioma and an asbestos cement plant environmental risk: a spatial case-control study in the city of Bari (Italy). Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:489–497
Robinson BW, Lake RA (2005) Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med 353:1591–1603
Testa JR, Cheung M, Pei J et al (2011) Germline BAP1 mutations predispose to malignant mesothelioma. Nat Genet 43:1022–1025
Testa JR, Carbone M (2016) Mesothelioma. In: Schwab M (ed) Encyclopedia of cancer, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg
Vogelzang N, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21:2636–2644
Wagner JC, Sleggs CA, Marchand P (1960) Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape province. Br J Ind Med 17:260–271
Wolf AS, Flores RM (2016) Current treatment of mesothelioma: extrapleural pneumonectomy versus pleurectomy/decortication. Thorac Surg Clin 26:359–375
Acknowledgements
The Editor is grateful to the many talented laboratory colleagues and collaborators he has been privileged to work with over the years in a collective effort to unravel the pathogenesis of mesothelioma. He gives special thanks to Fox Chase Cancer Center, NIH, and the Local #14 of the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers for their sustained financial support over the last three decades.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Testa, J.R. (2017). Malignant Mesothelioma: An Asbestos Legacy. In: Testa, J. (eds) Asbestos and Mesothelioma. Current Cancer Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53560-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53560-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53558-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53560-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)