Abstract
The budding yeast S. cerevisiae is a powerful model to understand the multiple layers of control driving an asymmetric cell division. In budding yeast, asymmetric targeting of the spindle poles to the mother and bud cell compartments respectively orients the mitotic spindle along the mother–bud axis. This program exploits an intrinsic functional asymmetry arising from the age distinction between the spindle poles—one inherited from the preceding division and the other newly assembled. Extrinsic mechanisms convert this age distinction into differential fate. Execution of this program couples spindle orientation with the segregation of the older spindle pole to the bud. Remarkably, similar stereotyped patterns of inheritance occur in self-renewing stem cell divisions underscoring the general importance of studying spindle polarity and differential fate in yeast. Here, we review the mechanisms accounting for this pivotal interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic asymmetries that translate spindle pole age into differential fate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adames NR, Cooper JA (2000) Microtubule interactions with the cell cortex causing nuclear movements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 149(4):863–874
Adames NR, Oberle JR, Cooper JA (2001) The surveillance mechanism of the spindle position checkpoint in yeast. J Cell Biol 153(1):159–168
Adams IR, Kilmartin JV (1999) Localization of core spindle pole body (SPB) components during SPB duplication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 145(4):809–823
Adams AE, Pringle JR (1984) Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 98(3):934–945
Akhmanova A, Steinmetz MO (2015) Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: two ends in the limelight. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(12):711–726. doi:10.1038/nrm4084
Alexandru G, Zachariae W, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K (1999) Sister chromatid separation and chromosome re-duplication are regulated by different mechanisms in response to spindle damage. EMBO J 18(10):2707–2721. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.10.2707
Amberg DC, Zahner JE, Mulholland JW, Pringle JR, Botstein D (1997) Aip3p/Bud6p, a yeast actin-interacting protein that is involved in morphogenesis and the selection of bipolar budding sites. Mol Biol Cell 8(4):729–753
Avena JS, Burns S, Yu Z, Ebmeier CC, Old WM, Jaspersen SL, Winey M (2014) Licensing of yeast centrosome duplication requires phosphoregulation of sfi1. Plos Genet 10(10):e1004666. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004666
Bardin AJ, Visintin R, Amon A (2000) A mechanism for coupling exit from mitosis to partitioning of the nucleus. Cell 102(1):21–31
Baro B, Rodriguez-Rodriguez JA, Calabria I, Hernaez ML, Gil C, Queralt E (2013) Dual regulation of the mitotic exit network (MEN) by PP2A-Cdc55 phosphatase. Plos Genet 9(12):e1003966. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003966
Bertazzi DT, Kurtulmus B, Pereira G (2011) The cortical protein Lte1 promotes mitotic exit by inhibiting the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4. J Cell Biol 193(6):1033–1048. doi:10.1083/jcb.201101056
Bi E, Park HO (2012) Cell polarization and cytokinesis in budding yeast. Genetics 191(2):347–387. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132886
Bridges AA, Gladfelter AS (2015) Septin form and function at the cell cortex. J Biol Chem 290(28):17173–17180. doi:10.1074/jbc.R114.634444
Burns S, Avena JS, Unruh JR, Yu Z, Smith SE, Slaughter BD, Winey M, Jaspersen SL (2015) Structured illumination with particle averaging reveals novel roles for yeast centrosome components during duplication. eLife:4. doi:10.7554/eLife.08586
Buttery SM, Yoshida S, Pellman D (2007) Yeast formins Bni1 and Bnr1 utilize different modes of cortical interaction during the assembly of actin cables. Mol Biol Cell 18(5):1826–1838
Byers B (1981) Cytology of the yeast life cycle. In: Strathern JN, Jones EW, Broach JR (eds) The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 59–96
Byers B, Goetsch L (1975) Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 124(1):511–523
Carminati JL, Stearns T (1997) Microtubules orient the mitotic spindle in yeast through dynein-dependent interactions with the cell cortex. J Cell Biol 138(3):629–641
Castillon GA, Adames NR, Rosello CH, Seidel HS, Longtine MS, Cooper JA, Heil-Chapdelaine RA (2003) Septins have a dual role in controlling mitotic exit in budding yeast. Curr Biol 13(8):654–658
Caydasi AK, Pereira G (2009) Spindle alignment regulates the dynamic association of checkpoint proteins with yeast spindle pole bodies. Dev Cell 16(1):146–156. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.10.013
Caydasi AK, Pereira G (2012) SPOC alert—when chromosomes get the wrong direction. Exp Cell Res 318(12):1421–1427. doi:S0014-4827(12)00167-X [pii] 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.031
Caydasi AK, Kurtulmus B, Orrico MI, Hofmann A, Ibrahim B, Pereira G (2010) Elm1 kinase activates the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4. J Cell Biol 190(6):975–989. doi:10.1083/jcb.201006151
Caydasi AK, Lohel M, Grunert G, Dittrich P, Pereira G, Ibrahim B (2012) A dynamical model of the spindle position checkpoint. Mol Syst Biol 8:582. doi:10.1038/msb.2012.15
Caydasi AK, Micoogullari Y, Kurtulmus B, Palani S, Pereira G (2014) The 14-3-3 protein Bmh1 functions in the spindle position checkpoint by breaking Bfa1 asymmetry at yeast centrosomes. Mol Biol Cell 25(14):2143–2151. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0890
Cepeda-Garcia C, Delgehyr N, Ortiz MA, ten Hoopen R, Zhiteneva A, Segal M (2010) Actin-mediated delivery of astral microtubules instructs Kar9p asymmetric loading to the bud-ward spindle pole. Mol Biol Cell 21(15):2685–2695
Chan LY, Amon A (2009) The protein phosphatase 2A functions in the spindle position checkpoint by regulating the checkpoint kinase Kin4. Genes Dev 23(14):1639–1649. doi:10.1101/gad.1804609
Chan LY, Amon A (2010) Spindle position is coordinated with cell-cycle progression through establishment of mitotic exit-activating and -inhibitory zones. Mol Cell 39(3):444–454. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.032
Chant J, Mischke M, Mitchell E, Herskowitz I, Pringle JR (1995) Role of Bud3p in producing the axial budding pattern of yeast. J Cell Biol 129(3):767–778
Chesarone MA, DuPage AG, Goode BL (2010) Unleashing formins to remodel the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(1):62–74
Chia W, Somers WG, Wang HY (2008) Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions: cell cycle regulators, asymmetric protein localization, and tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol 180(2):267–272. doi:10.1083/jcb.200708159
Conduit PT, Raff JW (2010) Cnn dynamics drive centrosome size asymmetry to ensure daughter centriole retention in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr Biol 20(24):2187–2192. doi:S0960-9822(10)01521-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.055
Conduit PT, Wainman A, Raff JW (2015) Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16(10):611–624. doi:10.1038/nrm4062
Cuschieri L, Miller R, Vogel J (2006) Gamma-tubulin is required for proper recruitment and assembly of Kar9-Bim1 complexes in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 17(10):4420–4434
D’Aquino KE, Monje-Casas F, Paulson J, Reiser V, Charles GM, Lai L, Shokat KM, Amon A (2005) The protein kinase Kin4 inhibits exit from mitosis in response to spindle position defects. Mol Cell 19(2):223–234. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.005
Delgehyr N, Lopes CS, Moir CA, Huisman SM, Segal M (2008) Dissecting the involvement of formins in Bud6p-mediated cortical capture of microtubules in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 22):3803–3814
Elserafy M, Saric M, Neuner A, Lin TC, Zhang WL, Seybold C, Sivashanmugam L, Schiebel E (2014) Molecular mechanisms that restrict yeast centrosome duplication to one event per cell cycle. Curr Biol 24(13):1456–1466. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.032
Erlemann S, Neuner A, Gombos L, Gibeaux R, Antony C, Schiebel E (2012) An extended gamma-tubulin ring functions as a stable platform in microtubule nucleation. J Cell Biol 197(1):59–74. doi:10.1083/jcb.201111123
Evangelista M, Pruyne D, Amberg DC, Boone C, Bretscher A (2002) Formins direct Arp2/3-independent actin filament assembly to polarize cell growth in yeast. Nat Cell Biol 4(3):260–269
Falk JE, Chan LY, Amon A (2011) Lte1 promotes mitotic exit by controlling the localization of the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(31):12584–12590. doi:10.1073/pnas.1107784108
Falk JE, Tsuchiya D, Verdaasdonk J, Lacefield S, Bloom K, Amon A (2016) Spatial signals link exit from mitosis to spindle position. eLife 5. doi:10.7554/eLife.14036
Fraschini R, Formenti E, Lucchini G, Piatti S (1999) Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from Mad2. J Cell Biol 145(5):979–991
Fraschini R, D’Ambrosio C, Venturetti M, Lucchini G, Piatti S (2006) Disappearance of the budding yeast Bub2-Bfa1 complex from the mother-bound spindle pole contributes to mitotic exit. J Cell Biol 172(3):335–346. doi:10.1083/jcb.200507162
Gasic I, Nerurkar P, Meraldi P (2015) Centrosome age regulates kinetochore-microtubule stability and biases chromosome mis-segregation. eLife 4:e07909. doi:10.7554/eLife.07909
Geissler S, Pereira G, Spang A, Knop M, Soues S, Kilmartin J, Schiebel E (1996) The spindle pole body component Spc98p interacts with the gamma-tubulin-like Tub4p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the sites of microtubule attachment. Embo J 15(15):3899–3911
Geymonat M, Spanos A, Smith SJ, Wheatley E, Rittinger K, Johnston LH, Sedgwick SG (2002) Control of mitotic exit in budding yeast. In vitro regulation of Tem1 GTPase by Bub2 and Bfa1. J Biol Chem 277(32):28439–28445. doi:10.1074/jbc.M202540200
Geymonat M, Spanos A, Walker PA, Johnston LH, Sedgwick SG (2003) In vitro regulation of budding yeast Bfa1/Bub2 GAP activity by Cdc5. J Biol Chem 278(17):14591–14594. doi:10.1074/jbc.C300059200
Geymonat M, Spanos A, de Bettignies G, Sedgwick SG (2009) Lte1 contributes to Bfa1 localization rather than stimulating nucleotide exchange by Tem1. J Cell Biol 187(4):497–511. doi:10.1083/jcb.200905114
Geymonat M, Spanos A, Jensen S, Sedgwick SG (2010) Phosphorylation of Lte1 by Cdk prevents polarized growth during mitotic arrest in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 191(6):1097–1112. doi:10.1083/jcb.201005070
Goode BL, Eskin JA, Wendland B (2015) Actin and endocytosis in budding yeast. Genetics 199(2):315–358. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145540
Graziano BR, Jonasson EM, Pullen JG, Gould CJ, Goode BL (2013) Ligand-induced activation of a formin-NPF pair leads to collaborative actin nucleation. J Cell Biol 201(4):595–611. doi:10.1083/jcb.201212059
Gruneberg U, Campbell K, Simpson C, Grindlay J, Schiebel E (2000) Nud1p links astral microtubule organization and the control of exit from mitosis. EMBO J 19(23):6475–6488. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.23.6475
Gryaznova Y, Koca Caydasi A, Malengo G, Sourjik V, Pereira G (2016) A FRET-based study reveals site-specific regulation of spindle position checkpoint proteins at yeast centrosomes. eLife:5. doi:10.7554/eLife.14029
Gupta ML Jr, Carvalho P, Roof DM, Pellman D (2006) Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle. Nat Cell Biol 8(9):913–923
Haber JE (2012) Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191(1):33–64. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.134577
Hartwell LH (1974) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. Bacteriol Rev 38(2):164–198
Hofken T, Schiebel E (2002) A role for cell polarity proteins in mitotic exit. EMBO J 21(18):4851–4862
Hotz M, Leisner C, Chen D, Manatschal C, Wegleiter T, Ouellet J, Lindstrom D, Gottschling DE, Vogel J, Barral Y (2012a) Spindle pole bodies exploit the mitotic exit network in metaphase to drive their age-dependent segregation. Cell 148(5):958–972. doi:S0092-8674(12)00151-1[pii] 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.041
Hotz M, Lengefeld J, Barral Y (2012b) The MEN mediates the effects of the spindle assembly checkpoint on Kar9-dependent spindle pole body inheritance in budding yeast. Cell Cycle 11(16):3109–3116. doi:10.4161/cc.21504
Howell AS, Lew DJ (2012) Morphogenesis and the cell cycle. Genetics 190(1):51–77. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128314
Howell AS, Savage NS, Johnson SA, Bose I, Wagner AW, Zyla TR, Nijhout HF, Reed MC, Goryachev AB, Lew DJ (2009) Singularity in polarization: rewiring yeast cells to make two buds. Cell 139(4):731–743. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.024
Howell AS, Jin M, Wu CF, Zyla TR, Elston TC, Lew DJ (2012) Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149(2):322–333. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.012
Hu F, Wang Y, Liu D, Li Y, Qin J, Elledge SJ (2001) Regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell 107(5):655–665
Huffaker TC, Thomas JH, Botstein D (1988) Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol 106(6):1997–2010
Huisman SM, Segal M (2005) Cortical capture of microtubules and spindle polarity in budding yeast—where’s the catch? J Cell Sci 118(Pt 3):463–471
Huisman SM, Bales OA, Bertrand M, Smeets MF, Reed SI, Segal M (2004) Differential contribution of Bud6p and Kar9p to microtubule capture and spindle orientation in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 167(2):231–244
Huisman SM, Smeets MF, Segal M (2007) Phosphorylation of Spc110p by Cdc28p-Clb5p kinase contributes to correct spindle morphogenesis in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 120(Pt 3):435–446
Hung HF, Hehnly H, Doxsey S (2016) The mother centriole appendage protein cenexin modulates lumen formation through spindle orientation. Curr Biol 26(6):793–801. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.025
Hwang E, Kusch J, Barral Y, Huffaker TC (2003) Spindle orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the transport of microtubule ends along polarized actin cables. J Cell Biol 161(3):483–488
Imamura H, Tanaka K, Hihara T, Umikawa M, Kamei T, Takahashi K, Sasaki T, Takai Y (1997) Bni1p and Bnr1p: downstream targets of the Rho family small G-proteins which interact with profilin and regulate actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 16(10):2745–2755
Januschke J, Llamazares S, Reina J, Gonzalez C (2011) Drosophila neuroblasts retain the daughter centrosome. Nat Commun 2:243. doi:ncomms1245 [pii] 10.1038/ncomms1245
Januschke J, Reina J, Llamazares S, Bertran T, Rossi F, Roig J, Gonzalez C (2013) Centrobin controls mother-daughter centriole asymmetry in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 15(3):241–248. doi:ncb2671 [pii] 10.1038/ncb2671
Jensen S, Geymonat M, Johnson AL, Segal M, Johnston LH (2002) Spatial regulation of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Lte1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 115(Pt 24):4977–4991
Juanes MA, Piatti S (2016) The final cut: cell polarity meets cytokinesis at the bud neck in S. cerevisiae. Cell Mol Life Sci. doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2220-3
Juanes MA, Twyman H, Tunnacliffe E, Guo Z, ten Hoopen R, Segal M (2013) Spindle pole body history intrinsically links pole identity with asymmetric fate in budding yeast. Curr Biol 23(14):1310–1319. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.057
Keck JM, Jones MH, Wong CCL, Binkley J, Chen DC, Jaspersen SL, Holinger EP, Xu T, Niepel M, Rout MP, Vogel J, Sidow A, Yates JR, Winey M (2011) A cell cycle phosphoproteome of the yeast centrosome. Science 332(6037):1557–1561. doi:10.1126/science.1205193
Knop M, Schiebel E (1997) Spc98p and Spc97p of the yeast gamma-tubulin complex mediate binding to the spindle pole body via their interaction with Spc110p. EMBO J 16(23):6985–6995. doi:10.1093/emboj/16.23.6985
Knop M, Schiebel E (1998) Receptors determine the cellular localization of a gamma-tubulin complex and thereby the site of microtubule formation. EMBO J 17(14):3952–3967. doi:10.1093/emboj/17.14.3952
Knop M, Pereira G, Geissler S, Grein K, Schiebel E (1997) The spindle pole body component Spc97p interacts with the gamma-tubulin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and functions in microtubule organization and spindle pole body duplication. EMBO J 16(7):1550–1564. doi:10.1093/emboj/16.7.1550
Kozubowski L, Saito K, Johnson JM, Howell AS, Zyla TR, Lew DJ (2008) Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex. Curr Biol 18(22):1719–1726. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.060
Laan L, Pavin N, Husson J, Romet-Lemonne G, van Duijn M, López MP, Vale RD, Jülicher F, Reck-Peterson SL, Dogterom M (2012) Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell 148(3):502–514
Li R (1999) Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(9):4989–4994
Li R (2013) The art of choreographing asymmetric cell division. Dev Cell 25(5):439–450. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2013.05.003
Liakopoulos D, Kusch J, Grava S, Vogel J, Barral Y (2003) Asymmetric loading of Kar9 onto spindle poles and microtubules ensures proper spindle alignment. Cell 112(4):561–574
Lin TC, Gombos L, Neuner A, Sebastian D, Olsen JV, Hrle A, Benda C, Schiebel E (2011) Phosphorylation of the yeast gamma-tubulin Tub4 regulates microtubule function. Plos One 6(5). doi:ARTN e19700 10.1371/journal.pone.0019700
Lin TC, Neuner A, Schlosser YT, Scharf AN, Weber L, Schiebel E (2014) Cell-cycle dependent phosphorylation of yeast pericentrin regulates gamma-TuSC-mediated microtubule nucleation. eLife 3:e02208. doi:10.7554/eLife.02208
Lin TC, Neuner A, Schiebel E (2015) Targeting of gamma-tubulin complexes to microtubule organizing centers: conservation and divergence. Trends Cell Biol 25(5):296–307. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.002
Lord M, Yang MC, Mischke M, Chant J (2000) Cell cycle programs of gene expression control morphogenetic protein localization. J Cell Biol 151(7):1501–1512
Maekawa H, Schiebel E (2004) Cdk1-Clb4 controls the interaction of astral microtubule plus ends with subdomains of the daughter cell cortex. Genes Dev 18(14):1709–1724
Maekawa H, Priest C, Lechner J, Pereira G, Schiebel E (2007) The yeast centrosome translates the positional information of the anaphase spindle into a cell cycle signal. J Cell Biol 179(3):423–436. doi:10.1083/jcb.200705197
Marschall LG, Jeng RL, Mulholland J, Stearns T (1996) Analysis of Tub4p, a yeast gamma-tubulin-like protein: implications for microtubule-organizing center function. J Cell Biol 134(2):443–454. doi:10.1083/jcb.134.2.443
McIntosh JR, O'Toole ET (1999) Life cycles of yeast spindle pole bodies: getting microtubules into a closed nucleus. Biol Cell 91(4–5):305–312. doi:S0248-4900(99)80091-4 [pii]
Meitinger F, Richter H, Heisel S, Hub B, Seufert W, Pereira G (2013) A safeguard mechanism regulates Rho GTPases to coordinate cytokinesis with the establishment of cell polarity. PLoS Biol 11(2):e1001495. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001495
Meitinger F, Khmelinskii A, Morlot S, Kurtulmus B, Palani S, Andres-Pons A, Hub B, Knop M, Charvin G, Pereira G (2014) A memory system of negative polarity cues prevents replicative aging. Cell 159(5):1056–1069. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.014
Menendez-Benito V, van Deventer SJ, Jimenez-Garcia V, Roy-Luzarraga M, van Leeuwen F, Neefjes J (2013) Spatiotemporal analysis of organelle and macromolecular complex inheritance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(1):175–180. doi:1207424110 [pii] 10.1073/pnas.1207424110
Monje-Casas F, Amon A (2009) Cell polarity determinants establish asymmetry in MEN signaling. Dev Cell 16(1):132–145. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.002
Moore JK, Cooper JA (2010) Coordinating mitosis with cell polarity: molecular motors at the cell cortex. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21(3):283–289. doi:S1084-9521(10)00021-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.01.020
Moore JK, Miller RK (2007) The CDK, Cdc28p, regulates multiple aspects of Kar9p function in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 18(4):1187–1202. doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-04-0360
Moore JK, Magidson V, Khodjakov A, Cooper JA (2009a) The spindle position checkpoint requires positional feedback from cytoplasmic microtubules. Curr Biol 19(23):2026–2030. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.020
Moore JK, Stuchell-Brereton MD, Cooper JA (2009b) Function of dynein in budding yeast: mitotic spindle positioning in a polarized cell. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 66(8):546–555. doi:10.1002/cm.20364
Moore JK, Chudalayandi P, Heil-Chapdelaine RA, Cooper JA (2010) The spindle position checkpoint is coordinated by the Elm1 kinase. J Cell Biol 191(3):493–503. doi:10.1083/jcb.201006092
Moseley JB, Goode BL (2006) The yeast actin cytoskeleton: from cellular function to biochemical mechanism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70(3):605–645
Nelson SA, Cooper JA (2007) A novel pathway that coordinates mitotic exit with spindle position. Mol Biol Cell 18(9):3440–3450. doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-03-0242
O’Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, Giddings TH Jr, Winey M, Burke DJ, McIntosh JR (1997) Three-dimensional analysis and ultrastructural design of mitotic spindles from the cdc20 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 8(1):1–11
O’Toole ET, Winey M, McIntosh JR (1999) High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10(6):2017–2031
Okada K, Bartolini F, Deaconescu AM, Moseley JB, Dogic Z, Grigorieff N, Gundersen GG, Goode BL (2010) Adenomatous polyposis coli protein nucleates actin assembly and synergizes with the formin mDia1. J Cell Biol 189(7):1087–1096
Palmer RE, Sullivan DS, Huffaker T, Koshland D (1992) Role of astral microtubules and actin in spindle orientation and migration in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 119(3):583–593
Pearson CG, Bloom K (2004) Dynamic microtubules lead the way for spindle positioning. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(6):481–492
Pereira G, Schiebel E (2005) Kin4 kinase delays mitotic exit in response to spindle alignment defects. Mol Cell 19(2):209–221. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.030
Pereira G, Yamashita YM (2011) Fly meets yeast: checking the correct orientation of cell division. Trends Cell Biol 21(9):526–533
Pereira G, Knop M, Schiebel E (1998) Spc98p directs the yeast gamma-tubulin complex into the nucleus and is subject to cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation on the nuclear side of the spindle pole body. Mol Biol Cell 9(4):775–793
Pereira G, Grueneberg U, Knop M, Schiebel E (1999) Interaction of the yeast gamma-tubulin complex-binding protein Spc72p with Kar1p is essential for microtubule function during karyogamy. EMBO J 18(15):4180–4195. doi:10.1093/emboj/18.15.4180
Pereira G, Hofken T, Grindlay J, Manson C, Schiebel E (2000) The Bub2p spindle checkpoint links nuclear migration with mitotic exit. Mol Cell 6(1):1–10
Pereira G, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E (2001) Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J 20(22):6359–6370
Pereira G, Manson C, Grindlay J, Schiebel E (2002) Regulation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p complex at spindle pole bodies by the cell cycle phosphatase Cdc14p. J Cell Biol 157(3):367–379. doi:10.1083/jcb.200112085
Pringle JR, Bi E, Harkins HA, Zahner JE, De Virgilio C, Chant J, Corrado K, Fares H (1995) Establishment of cell polarity in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 60:729–744
Pruyne D, Evangelista M, Yang C, Bi E, Zigmond S, Bretscher A, Boone C (2002) Role of formins in actin assembly: nucleation and barbed-end association. Science 297(5581):612–615
Pruyne D, Gao L, Bi E, Bretscher A (2004) Stable and dynamic axes of polarity use distinct formin isoforms in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15(11):4971–4989
Rebollo E, Sampaio P, Januschke J, Llamazares S, Varmark H, Gonzalez C (2007) Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 12(3):467–474
Rock JM, Amon A (2011) Cdc15 integrates Tem1 GTPase-mediated spatial signals with Polo kinase-mediated temporal cues to activate mitotic exit. Genes Dev 25(18):1943–1954. doi:10.1101/gad.17257711
Rock JM, Lim D, Stach L, Ogrodowicz RW, Keck JM, Jones MH, Wong CCL, Yates JR, Winey M, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB, Amon A (2013) Activation of the yeast hippo pathway by phosphorylation-dependent assembly of signaling complexes. Science 340(6134):871–875. doi:10.1126/science.1235822
Sagot I, Klee SK, Pellman D (2002) Yeast formins regulate cell polarity by controlling the assembly of actin cables. Nat Cell Biol 4(1):42–50
Scarfone I, Venturetti M, Hotz M, Lengefeld J, Barral Y, Piatti S (2015) Asymmetry of the budding yeast Tem1 GTPase at spindle poles is required for spindle positioning but not for mitotic exit. Plos Genet 11(2):e1004938. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004938
Schiebel E (2000) Gamma-tubulin complexes: binding to the centrosome, regulation and microtubule nucleation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12(1):113–118. doi:S0955-0674(99)00064-2 [pii]
Schweiggert J, Stevermann L, Panigada D, Kammerer D, Liakopoulos D (2016) Regulation of a spindle positioning factor at kinetochores by SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases. Dev Cell 36(4):415–427. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2016.01.011
Segal M, Bloom K (2001) Control of spindle polarity and orientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Trends Cell Biol 11(4):160–166
Segal M, Clarke DJ, Reed SI (1998) Clb5-associated kinase activity is required early in the spindle pathway for correct preanaphase nuclear positioning in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 143(1):135–145
Segal M, Bloom K, Reed SI (2000a) Bud6 directs sequential microtubule interactions with the bud tip and bud neck during spindle morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):3689–3702
Segal M, Clarke DJ, Maddox P, Salmon ED, Bloom K, Reed SI (2000b) Coordinated spindle assembly and orientation requires Clb5p-dependent kinase in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 148(3):441–452
Segal M, Bloom K, Reed SI (2002) Kar9p-independent microtubule capture at Bud6p cortical sites primes spindle polarity before bud emergence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 13(12):4141–4155
Seshan A, Amon A (2005) Ras and the Rho effector Cla4 collaborate to target and anchor Lte1 at the bud cortex. Cell Cycle 4(7):940–946
Seybold C, Elserafy M, Ruthnick D, Ozboyaci M, Neuner A, Flottmann B, Heilemann M, Wade RC, Schiebel E (2015) Kar1 binding to Sfi1 C-terminal regions anchors the SPB bridge to the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 209(6):843–861. doi:10.1083/jcb.201412050
Shaw SL, Yeh E, Maddox P, Salmon ED, Bloom K (1997) Astral microtubule dynamics in yeast: a microtubule-based searching mechanism for spindle orientation and nuclear migration into the bud. J Cell Biol 139(4):985–994
Sobel SG, Snyder M (1995) Highly divergent gamma-tubulin gene is essential for cell growth and proper microtubule organization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 131(6):1775–1788. doi:10.1083/jcb.131.6.1775
Su X, Qiu W, Gupta ML Jr, Pereira-Leal JB, Reck-Peterson SL, Pellman D (2011) Mechanisms underlying the dual-mode regulation of microtubule dynamics by Kip3/kinesin-8. Mol Cell 43(5):751–763
Ten Hoopen R, Cepeda-Garcia C, Fernandez-Arruti R, Juanes MA, Delgehyr N, Segal M (2012) Mechanism for astral microtubule capture by cortical Bud6p priming spindle polarity in S. cerevisiae. Curr Biol 22(12):1075–1083. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.059
Theesfeld CL, Irazoqui JE, Bloom K, Lew DJ (1999) The role of actin in spindle orientation changes during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol 146(5):1019–1032
Tong Z, Gao XD, Howell AS, Bose I, Lew DJ, Bi E (2007) Adjacent positioning of cellular structures enabled by a Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein-mediated zone of inhibition. J Cell Biol 179(7):1375–1384. doi:10.1083/jcb.200705160
Valerio-Santiago M, Monje-Casas F (2011) Tem1 localization to the spindle pole bodies is essential for mitotic exit and impairs spindle checkpoint function. J Cell Biol 192(4):599–614. doi:10.1083/jcb.201007044
Visintin R, Amon A (2001) Regulation of the mitotic exit protein kinases Cdc15 and Dbf2. Mol Biol Cell 12(10):2961–2974
Wang X, Tsai JW, Imai JH, Lian WN, Vallee RB, Shi SH (2009) Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex. Nature 461(7266):947–955
Weiss EL (2012) Mitotic exit and separation of mother and daughter cells. Genetics 192(4):1165–1202. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145516
Winey M, Bloom K (2012) Mitotic spindle form and function. Genetics 190(4):1197–1224. doi:190/4/1197 [pii] 10.1534/genetics.111.128710
Winey M, Mamay CL, O’Toole ET, Mastronarde DN, Giddings TH Jr, McDonald KL, McIntosh JR (1995) Three-dimensional ultrastructural analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitotic spindle. J Cell Biol 129(6):1601–1615
Woods B, Kuo CC, Wu CF, Zyla TR, Lew DJ (2015) Polarity establishment requires localized activation of Cdc42. J Cell Biol 211(1):19–26. doi:10.1083/jcb.201506108
Wu CF, Savage NS, Lew DJ (2013) Interaction between bud-site selection and polarity-establishment machineries in budding yeast. Philos Trans R Soc London B Biol Sci 368(1629):20130006. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0006
Wu CF, Chiou JG, Minakova M, Woods B, Tsygankov D, Zyla TR, Savage NS, Elston TC, Lew DJ (2015) Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front. eLife 4. doi:10.7554/eLife.11611
Yamashita YM, Mahowald AP, Perlin JR, Fuller MT (2007) Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science 315(5811):518–521
Yeh E, Yang C, Chin E, Maddox P, Salmon ED, Lew DJ, Bloom K (2000) Dynamic positioning of mitotic spindles in yeast: role of microtubule motors and cortical determinants. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):3949–3961
Yin H, Pruyne D, Huffaker TC, Bretscher A (2000) Myosin V orientates the mitotic spindle in yeast. Nature 406(6799):1013–1015
Yoder TJ, Pearson CG, Bloom K, Davis TN (2003) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body is a dynamic structure. Mol Biol Cell 14(8):3494–3505. doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0655 E02-10-0655 [pii]
Yoshida S, Asakawa K, Toh-e A (2002) Mitotic exit network controls the localization of Cdc14 to the spindle pole body in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 12(11):944–950
Yoshida S, Ichihashi R, Toh-e A (2003) Ras recruits mitotic exit regulator Lte1 to the bud cortex in budding yeast. J Cell Biol 161(5):889–897. doi:10.1083/jcb.200301128
Acknowledgements
We thank members of the Segal, Geymonat, Draviam, Lindon, and Glover laboratories for advice and fruitful discussions. Work in our laboratory has been partly supported by the Wellcome Trust and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geymonat, M., Segal, M. (2017). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Determinants Linking Spindle Pole Fate, Spindle Polarity, and Asymmetric Cell Division in the Budding Yeast S. cerevisiae . In: Tassan, JP., Kubiak, J. (eds) Asymmetric Cell Division in Development, Differentiation and Cancer. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53150-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53150-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53149-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53150-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)