Abstract
Asymmetric cell division during embryogenesis contributes to cell diversity by generating daughter cells that adopt distinct developmental fates. In this chapter, we summarize current knowledge of three examples of asymmetric cell division occurring in ascidian early embryos: (1) Three successive cell divisions that are asymmetric in terms of cell fate and unequal in cell size in the germline lineage at the embryo posterior pole. A subcellular structure, the centrosome-attracting body (CAB), and maternal PEM mRNAs localized within it control both the positioning of the cell division planes and segregation of the germ cell fates. (2) Asymmetric cell divisions involving endoderm and mesoderm germ layer separation. Asymmetric partitioning of zygotically expressed mRNA for Not, a homeodomain transcription factor, promotes the mesoderm fate and suppresses the endoderm fate. This asymmetric partitioning is mediated by transient nuclear migration toward the mesodermal pole of the mother cell, where the mRNA is delivered. In this case, there is no special regulation of cleavage plane orientation. (3) Asymmetric cell divisions in the marginal region of the vegetal hemisphere. The directed extracellular FGF and ephrin signals polarize the mother cells, inducing distinct fates in a pair of daughter cells (nerve versus notochord and mesenchyme versus muscle). The directions of cell division are regulated and oriented but independently of FGF and ephrin signaling. In these examples, polarization of the mother cells is facilitated by localized maternal factors, by delivery of transcripts from the nucleus to one pole of each cell, and by directed extracellular signals. Two cellular processes—asymmetric fate allocation and orientation of the cell division plane—are coupled by a single factor in the first example, but these processes are regulated independently in the third example. Thus, various modes of asymmetric cell division operate even at the early developmental stages in this single type of organism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Nomenclature of ascidian blastomeres. Each blastomere is assigned its name such as B4.1, A5.2, and b5.6. Capital letters are for the cells of the vegetal hemisphere. Lower case letters are for the animal hemisphere cells. A and a for the anterior blastomere. B and b for the posterior blastomeres (see Fig. 12.2a, 8-cell embryo). First digit represents the generation. Second digit is a unique number based on its relative position after cell division.
References
Arvanitis D, Davy A (2008) Eph/ephrin signaling: networks. Genes Dev 22:416–429. doi:10.1101/gad.1630408
Bowerman B, Draper BW, Mello CC, Priess JR (1993) The maternal gene skn-1 encodes a protein that is distributed unequally in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 74:443–452. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)80046-H
Burgess DJ (2011) Hidden rewiring comes to light. Nat Rev Genet 12:586. doi:10.1038/nrg3060
Chabry L (1887) Contribution à l’embrologie normale tératologique des ascidies simples. J l’anatomie la Physiol Norm Pathol l’homme des animaux 23:167–321
Chen C, Fingerhut JM, Yamashita YM (2016) The ins(ide) and outs(ide) of asymmetric stem cell division. Curr Opin Cell Biol 43:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2016.06.001
Conklin E (1905) The organization and cell lineage of the ascidian egg. J Acad Nat Sci 13:1–119. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Cooley J, Whitaker S, Sweeney S, Fraser S, Davidson B (2011) Cytoskeletal polarity mediates localized induction of the heart progenitor lineage. Nat Cell Biol 13:952–957. doi:10.1038/ncb2291
Cota CD, Davidson B (2015) Mitotic membrane turnover coordinates differential induction of the heart progenitor lineage. Dev Cell 34:505–519. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.07.001
Couwenbergs C, Labbé JC, Goulding M et al (2007) Heterotrimeric G protein signaling functions with dynein to promote spindle positioning in C. elegans. J Cell Biol 179:15–22. doi:10.1083/jcb.200707085
Darras S, Nishida H (2001) The BMP signaling pathway is required together with the FGF pathway for notochord induction in the ascidian embryo. Development 128:2629–2638
Davidson B, Shi W, Beh J et al (2006) FGF signaling delineates the cardiac progenitor field in the simple chordate, Ciona intestinalis. Genes Dev 20:2728–2738. doi:10.1101/gad.1467706
Davidson EH, Davidson EH, Levine MS, Levine MS (2008) Properties of developmental gene regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:20063–20066. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806007105
Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H (2006) Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439:965–968. doi:10.1038/nature04336
Denker E, Bocina I, Jiang D (2013) Tubulogenesis in a simple cell cord requires the formation of bi-apical cells through two discrete Par domains. Development 140:2985–2996. doi:10.1242/dev.092387
Du Q, Macara IG (2004) Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell 119:503–516. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.028
Goldstein B (1995) Cell contacts orient some cell division axes in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. J Cell Biol 129:1071–1080. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03624.x
Grill SW, Gönczy P, Stelzer EH, Hyman AA (2001) Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 409:630–633. doi:10.1038/35054572
Gurdon JB (1992) The generation of diversity and pattern in animal development. Cell 68:185–199. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90465-O
Hashimoto H, Enomoto T, Kumano G, Nishida H (2011) The transcription factor FoxB mediates temporal loss of cellular competence for notochord induction in ascidian embryos. Development 138:2591–2600. doi:10.1242/dev.053082
Haupaix N, Stolfi A, Sirour C et al (2013) p120RasGAP mediates ephrin/Eph-dependent attenuation of FGF/ERK signals during cell fate specification in ascidian embryos. Development 140:4347–4352. doi:10.1242/dev.098756
Hibino T, Nishikata T, Nishida H (1998) Centrosome-attracting body: a novel structure closely related to unequal cleavages in the ascidian embryo. Dev Growth Differ 40:85–95
Hudson C, Yasuo H (2006) A signalling relay involving Nodal and Delta ligands acts during secondary notochord induction in Ciona embryos. Development 133:2855–2864. doi:10.1242/dev.02466
Hudson C, Yasuo H (2008) Similarity and diversity in mechanisms of muscle fate induction between ascidian species. Biol Cell 100:265–277. doi:10.1042/BC20070144
Hudson C, Kawai N, Negishi T, Yasuo H (2013) β-Catenin-driven binary fate specification segregates germ layers in Ascidian embryos. Curr Biol 23:491–495. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.005
Iseto T, Nishida H (1999) Ultrastructural studies on the centrosome-attracting body: electron-dense matrix and its role in unequal cleavages in ascidian embryos. Dev Growth Differ 41:601–609. doi:10.1046/j.1440-169x.1999.00457.x
Johnston DS, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1992) The origin of pattern and polarity in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 68:201–219. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90466-P
Kawai N, Iida Y, Kumano G, Nishida H (2007) Nuclear accumulation of β-catenin and transcription of downstream genes are regulated by zygotic Wnt5α and maternal Dsh in ascidian embryos. Dev Dyn 236:1570–1582. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21169
Kawashima T, Kawashima S, Kanehisa M et al (2000) MAGEST: MAboya gene expression patterns and sequence tags. Nucleic Acids Res 28:133–135. doi: gkd103 [pii]
Kemphues K (2000) PARsing embryonic polarity. Cell 101:345–348. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80844-2
Kemphues KJ, Priess JR, Morton DG, Cheng NS (1988) Identification of genes required for cytoplasmic localization in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 52:311–320. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(88)80024-2
Kim GJ, Nishida H (2001) Role of the FGF and MEK signaling pathway in the ascidian embryo. Dev Growth Differ 43:521–533. doi:10.1046/j.1440-169X.2001.00594.x
Kim GJ, Kumano G, Nishida H (2007) Cell fate polarization in ascidian mesenchyme/muscle precursors by directed FGF signaling and role for an additional ectodermal FGF antagonizing signal in notochord/nerve cord precursors. Development 134:1509–1518. doi:10.1242/dev.02825
Kimelman D, Griffin KJ (2000) Vertebrate mesendoderm induction and patterning. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10:350–356. doi:10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00095-2
Kobayashi K, Yamada L, Satou Y, Satoh N (2013) Differential gene expression in notochord and nerve cord fate segregation in the Ciona intestinalis embryo. Genesis 51:647–659. doi:10.1002/dvg.22413
Kumano G, Nishida H (2007) Ascidian embryonic development: an emerging model system for the study of cell fate specification in chordates. Dev Dyn 236:1732–1747. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21108
Kumano G, Yamaguchi S, Nishida H (2006) Overlapping expression of FoxA and Zic confers responsiveness to FGF signaling to specify notochord in ascidian embryos. Dev Biol 300:770–784. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.07.033
Kumano G, Kawai N, Nishida H (2010) Macho-1 regulates unequal cell divisions independently of its function as a muscle determinant. Dev Biol 344:284–292. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.013
Kumano G, Takatori N, Negishi T et al (2011) A maternal factor unique to ascidians silences the germline via binding to P-TEFb and RNAP II regulation. Curr Biol 21:1308–1313. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.050
Lemaire P (2009) Unfolding a chordate developmental program, one cell at a time: invariant cell lineages, short-range inductions and evolutionary plasticity in ascidians. Dev Biol 332:48–60. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.540
Lemaire P, Smith WC, Nishida H (2008) Ascidians and the plasticity of the chordate developmental program. Curr Biol 18:R620–R631. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.039
Macara IG (2004) Parsing the polarity code. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:220–231. doi:10.1038/nrm1332
Makabe KW, Nishida H (2012) Cytoplasmic localization and reorganization in ascidian eggs: role of postplasmic/PEM RNAs in axis formation and fate determination. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 1:501–518. doi:10.1002/wdev.54
Makabe KW, Kawashima T, Kawashima S et al (2001) Large-scale cDNA analysis of the maternal genetic information in the egg of Halocynthia roretzi for a gene expression catalog of ascidian development. Development 128:2555–2567
Nakamura A, Seydoux G (2008) Less is more: specification of the germline by transcriptional repression. Development 135:3817–3827. doi:10.1242/dev.022434
Nakamura Y, Makabe KW, Nishida H (2003) Localization and expression pattern of type I postplasmic mRNAs in embryos of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Gene Expr Patterns 3:71–75. doi:10.1016/S1567-133X(02)00069-8
Nakatani Y, Nishida H (1997) Ras is an essential component for notochord formation during ascidian embryogenesis. Mech Dev 68:81–89. doi:10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00131-7
Nakatani Y, Yasuo H, Satoh N, Nishida H (1996) Basic fibroblast growth factor induces notochord formation and the expression of As-T, a Brachyury homolog, during ascidian embryogenesis. Development 122:2023–2031
Negishi T, Yasuo H (2015) Distinct modes of mitotic spindle orientation align cells in the dorsal midline of ascidian embryos. Dev Biol 408:66–78. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.09.019
Negishi T, Takada T, Kawai N, Nishida H (2007) Localized PEM mRNA and protein are involved in cleavage-plane orientation and unequal cell divisions in ascidians. Curr Biol 17:1014–1025. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.047
Negishi T, Kumano G, Nishida H (2011) Polo-like kinase 1 is required for localization of posterior end mark protein to the centrosome-attracting body and unequal cleavages in ascidian embryos. Dev Growth Differ 53:76–87. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01231.x
Nguyen-Ngoc T, Afshar K, Gönczy P (2007) Coupling of cortical dynein and G alpha proteins mediates spindle positioning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol 9:1294–1302. doi:10.1038/ncb1649
Nishida H (1986) Cell division pattern during Gastrulation of the Ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Growth Differ 28:191–201. doi:10.1111/j.1440-169X.1986.00191.x
Nishida H (1987) Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. III. Up to the tissue restricted stage. Dev Biol 121:526–541. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(87)90188-6
Nishida H (2002) Patterning the marginal zone of early ascidian embryos: localized maternal mRNA and inductive interactions. Bioessays 24:613–624. doi:10.1002/bies.10099
Nishida H (2005) Specification of embryonic axis and mosaic development in ascidians. Dev Dyn 233:1177–1193
Nishida H, Satoh N (1983) Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. I. Up to the eight-cell stage. Dev Biol 99:382–394. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(83)90288-9
Nishida H, Satoh N (1985) Cell lineage analysis in ascidian embryos by intracellular injection of a tracer enzyme. II. The 16- and 32-cell stages. Dev Biol 110:440–454. doi:10.1016/0012-1606(85)90102-2
Nishida H, Sawada K (2001) macho-1 encodes a localized mRNA in ascidian eggs that specifies muscle fate during embryogenesis. Nature 409:724–729. doi:10.1038/35055568
Nishikata T, Hibino T, Nishida H (1999) The centrosome-attracting body, microtubule system, and posterior egg cytoplasm are involved in positioning of cleavage planes in the ascidian embryo. Dev Biol 209:72–85. doi:10.1006/dbio.1999.9244
Ohno S (2001) Intercellular junctions and cellular polarity: the PAR-aPKC complex, a conserved core cassette playing fundamental roles in cell polarity. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:641–648. doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00264-7
Paix A, Yamada L, Dru P et al (2009) Cortical anchorages and cell type segregations of maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs in ascidians. Dev Biol 336:96–111. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.001
Paix A, Le Nguyen PN, Sardet C (2011) Bi-polarized translation of ascidian maternal mRNA determinant pem-1 associated with regulators of the translation machinery on cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum (cER). Dev Biol 357:211–226. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.06.019
Patalano S, Prulière G, Prodon F et al (2006) The aPKC-PAR-6-PAR-3 cell polarity complex localizes to the centrosome attracting body, a macroscopic cortical structure responsible for asymmetric divisions in the early ascidian embryo. J Cell Sci 119:1592–1603. doi:10.1242/jcs.02873
Picco V, Hudson C, Yasuo H (2007) Ephrin-Eph signalling drives the asymmetric division of notochord/neural precursors in Ciona embryos. Development 134:1491–1497. doi:10.1242/dev.003939
Prodon F, Chenevert J, Hebras C et al (2010) Dual mechanism controls asymmetric spindle position in ascidian germ cell precursors. Development 137:2011–2021. doi:10.1242/dev.047845
Prodon F, Yamad L, Shirae-Kurabayashi M, Nakamura Y, Sasakura Y (2007) Postplasmic/PEM RNAs: a class of localized maternal mRNAs with multiple roles in cell polarity and development in ascidian embryos. Dev Dyn 236:1698–1715. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21109
Rebollo E, Sampaio P, Januschke J et al (2007) Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 12:467–474. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.021
Rocheleau CE, Downs WD, Lin R et al (1997) Wnt signaling and an APC-related gene specify endoderm in early C. elegans embryos. Cell 90:707–716. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80531-0
Rodaway A, Patient R (2001) Mesendoderm: an ancient germ layer? Cell 105:169–172. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00307-5
Sardet C, Nishida H, Prodon F, Sawada K (2003) Maternal mRNAs of PEM and macho 1, the ascidian muscle determinant, associate and move with a rough endoplasmic reticulum network in the egg cortex. Development 130:5839–5849. doi:10.1242/dev.00805
Sardet C, Dru P, Prodon F (2005) Maternal determinants and mRNAs in the cortex of ascidian oocytes, zygotes and embryos. Biol Cell 97:35–49. doi:10.1042/BC20040126
Schaefer M, Shevchenko A, Shevchenko A, Knoblich JA (2000) A protein complex containing inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. Curr Biol 10:353–362. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00401-2
Sherrard K, Robin F, Lemaire P, Munro E (2010) Sequential activation of apical and basolateral contractility drives ascidian endoderm invagination. Curr Biol 20:1499–1510. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.075
Shirae-Kurabayashi M, Nishikata T, Takamura K et al (2006) Dynamic redistribution of vasa homolog and exclusion of somatic cell determinants during germ cell specification in Ciona intestinalis. Development 133:2683–2193. doi:10.1242/dev.02446
Shirae-Kurabayashi M, Matsuda K, Nakamura A (2011) Ci-Pem-1 localizes to the nucleus and represses somatic gene transcription in the germline of Ciona intestinalis embryos. Development 138:2871–2881. doi:10.1242/dev.058131
Siller KH, Doe CQ (2009) Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat Cell Biol 11:365–374. doi:10.1038/ncb0409-365
Stach T, Anselmi C (2015) High-precision morphology: bifocal 4D-microscopy enables the comparison of detailed cell lineages of two chordate species separated for more than 525 million years. BMC Biol 13:113. doi:10.1186/s12915-015-0218-1
Strome S (1993) Determination of cleavage planes. Cell 72:3–6. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90041-N
Tabuse Y, Izumi Y, Piano F et al (1998) Atypical protein kinase C cooperates with PAR-3 to establish embryonic polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125:3607–3614
Takatori N, Kumano G, Saiga H, Nishida H (2010) Segregation of germ layer fates by nuclear migration-dependent localization of not mRNA. Dev Cell 19:589–598. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.003
Takatori N, Oonuma K, Nishida H, Saiga H (2015) Polarization of PI3K activity initiated by ooplasmic segregation guides nuclear migration in the Mesendoderm. Dev Cell 35:333–343. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.012
Tassy O, Daian F, Hudson C et al (2006) A quantitative approach to the study of cell shapes and interactions during early chordate embryogenesis. Curr Biol 16:345–358. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.044
Thorpe CJ, Schlesinger A, Clayton Carter J, Bowerman B (1997) Wnt signaling polarizes an early C. elegans blastomere to distinguish endoderm from mesoderm. Cell 90:695–705. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80530-9
True JR, Haag ES (2001) Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories. Evol Dev 3:109–119. doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003002109.x
Tsagkogeorga G, Turon X, Hopcroft RR et al (2009) An updated 18S rRNA phylogeny of tunicates based on mixture and secondary structure models. BMC Evol Biol 9:187. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-187
Utsumi N, Shimojima Y, Saiga H (2004) Analysis of ascidian not genes highlights their evolutionarily conserved and derived features of structure and expression in development. Dev Genes Evol 214:460–465. doi:10.1007/s00427-004-0425-1
Von Dassow G, Schmidt JE, Kimelman D (1993) Induction of the Xenopus organizer: Expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. Genes Dev 7:355–366. doi:10.1101/gad.7.3.355
Yamada L (2006) Embryonic expression profiles and conserved localization mechanisms of pem/postplasmic mRNAs of two species of ascidian, Ciona intestinalis and Ciona savignyi. Dev Biol 296:524–536. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.018
Yamada L, Kobayashi K, Satou Y, Satoh N (2005) Microarray analysis of localization of maternal transcripts in eggs and early embryos of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Dev Biol 284:536–550. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.027
Yamashita YM, Fuller MT (2008) Asymmetric centrosome behavior and the mechanisms of stem cell division. J Cell Biol 180:261–266. doi:10.1083/jcb.200707083
Yamashita YM, Jones DL, Fuller MT (2003) Orientation of asymmetric stem cell division by the APC tumor suppressor and centrosome. Science 301:1547–1550. doi:10.1126/science.1087795
Yoshida S, Marikawa Y, Satoh N (1996) Posterior end mark, a novel maternal gene encoding a localized factor in the ascidian embryo. Development 122:2005–2012
Zalokar M, Sardet C (1984) Tracing of cell lineage in embryonic development of Phallusia mammillata (Ascidia) by vital staining of mitochondria. Dev Biol 102:195–205
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Negishi, T., Nishida, H. (2017). Asymmetric and Unequal Cell Divisions in Ascidian Embryos. In: Tassan, JP., Kubiak, J. (eds) Asymmetric Cell Division in Development, Differentiation and Cancer. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53150-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53150-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53149-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53150-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)