Abstract
Benchmarking is a follow-up evaluation tool that compares the cost structure of facilities with that of a given reference, the benchmark or yardstick. What is assessed is not a policy per se, but the facilities in charge of implementing it (Sect. 12.1). The method is applicable to any public service operating within a multiple-input multiple-output setting and equipped with a cost accounting system (Sect. 12.2). As the demand for a set of services plays a determinant role in explaining the average cost of a facility, the first step is to delineate the effects of the demand structure on cost (Sect. 12.3). Benchmarking also assesses whether an extra cost observed in one facility is due to price effects or to the allocation of inputs among services (Sect. 12.4). The stakeholders of the public project may also wish to get alternative or complementary information on the role each input plays within the production structure. A simple reorganization of the data allows it (Sect. 12.5). Last, the method can be used to motivate operations improvement or to help a decision-maker understand where the performance falls in comparison to others (Sect. 12.6).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agarwal, R., Green, R., Agarwal, N., & Randhawa, K. (2016). Benchmarking management practices in Australian public healthcare. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 30, 31ā56.
Hansen, K., & Zwanziger, J. (1996). Marginal costs in general acute care hospitals: A comparison among California, New York and Canada. Health Economics, 5, 195ā216.
Llewellyn, S., & Northcott, D. (2005). The average hospital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 555ā583.
OECD. (1997). International benchmarking. Experiences from OECD countries.
OECD. (2013). International benchmarking for school improvement. OECD tests for schools (based on PISA).
Veillard, J., Champagne, F., Klazinga, N., Kazandjian, V., Arah, O., & Guisset, A. (2005). A performance assessment framework for hospitals: The WHO regional office for Europe PATH project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17, 487ā496.
Veillard, J., Schiotz, M., Guisset, A., Brown, A., & Klazinga, N. (2013). The PATH project in eight European countries: An evaluation. International Journal of Health Care Quality Insurance, 26, 703ā713.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Josselin, JM., Le Maux, B. (2017). Project Follow-Up by Benchmarking. In: Statistical Tools for Program Evaluation . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52827-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52827-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52826-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52827-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)