Abstract
In this chapter the author investigates the significance of the metafictional mode, which is used in a number of perpetrator narratives. Understanding metafiction to incorporate the text’s own self-awareness and the subsequent awareness of the reader as he or she responds to that text, the author argues that this technique necessitates the reader’s continual navigation between the ‘story world’ and the ‘real’ one. The texts thereby force the reader to continually renegotiate his or her relationship to the novel, and to the characters therein. By consequence, identification with the perpetrators of the Holocaust is continually disrupted, denying the possibility of straightforward empathetic responses and encoding a need for these literary encounters to remain reflective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is of significance that Wasserman is described as a kind of inverted Scheherazade: ‘tell me a story and stay alive’ (206). The inversion occurs because, as Wasserman indicates, ‘what applies to Scheherazade does not apply to me, for the simple reason that the same lovely maiden wished very much to live, which was why she told the sultan her stories, whereas I, on the contrary, wish very much to die, heaven forbid’ (208).
Bibliography
Adorno, Theodor. 1997 (1967). ‘Cultural Criticism and Society’. In Prisms: Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. London: MIT University Press, pp. 17–34.
Barthes, Roland. 1967. The Death of the Author. http://www.tbook.constantvzw.org/wp-content/death_authorbarthes.pdf (last accessed 12.1.15).
Binet, Laurent. 2012 (2009). HHhH. Trans. Sam Taylor. London: Harvill Secker.
Genette, Gérard. 1980 (1972). Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Trans. Jane E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Green, Gerald. 1978. Holocaust. London: Corgi Books.
Grossman, David. 1986. See Under: Love. London: Pan Books.
Hutcheon, Linda. 1984. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. London: Methuen.
Kearns, Michael. 2002. ‘Ethos, Morality, and Narrative Structure: Theory and Response’. Mountain Review of Language and Literature 56.2: 61–78.
McGlothlin, Erin. 2009. ‘Theorizing the Perpetrator in Bernhard Schlink’s The Reader and Martin Amis’s Time’s Arrow’. In After Representation? The Holocaust, Literature, and Culture. Eds. R. Clifton Spargo and Robert Ehrenreich. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 210–230.
Morahg, Gilead. 2002. ‘Creating Wasserman: The Quest for a New Holocaust Story in David Grossman’s See Under: Love’. Judaism 51.1: 51–60.
Picoult, Jodi. 2013. The Storyteller. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Razinsky, Liran. 2012a. ‘We Are All the Same: Max Aue, Interpreter of Evil’. Yale French Studies 121: 140–154.
Reynolds, Daniel. 2003. ‘A Portrait of Misreading: Bernhard’s Schlink’s Der Vorleser’. Seminar 39.3: 238–256.
Schlink, Bernhard. 1995. The Reader. Trans. Carol Brown Janeway. London: Phoenix House.
Trumbo, Cleo. 1979a. Foreword to Dalton Trumbo, Night of the Aurochs. New York: Viking Press.
Waugh, Patricia. 1988 (1984). Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pettitt, J. (2017). Drawing the Reader into the Narrative. In: Perpetrators in Holocaust Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52575-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52575-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52574-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52575-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)