Abstract
This chapter discusses the dual roles of higher education institutions, as recipients of higher education policy and as agents for change in the knowledge economy. Primarily, they are recipients of policy change influenced at the European level. Second, they are agents of policy change in the knowledge-based economy, which is of increasing importance in the twenty-first century. This is a new kind of regional integration, influenced by Europeanization and intergovernmentalism in higher education policy, with the ultimate objectives of achieving (1) economic competitiveness and (2) social cohesion through a system of higher educational qualifications and their international recognition. The success of the European Commission’s study-abroad program, Erasmus, is discussed as a component of the Bologna Process, which has incorporated mobility objectives for higher education. The opportunity for greater mobility in international education corresponds with the ongoing trends in globalization.
The Europe we are building up is not only the one of the euro, of the banks and of the economy; it must be a Europe of knowledge as well. We must strengthen and build upon the intellectual, cultural, social and technical dimensions of our continent. These have to a large extent been shaped by its universities, which continue to play a pivotal role for their development.
The Sorbonne Declaration (excerpt), May 25, 1998
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amaral, A. (2011). ERA and the Bologna Process: Implementation problems and the human resource factor. In S. Avveduto (Ed.), Convergence or differentiation. Human resources for research in a changing European scenario (pp. 13–54). Naples: ScriptaWeb.
Bache, I. (2006). The Europeanization of higher education: Markets, politics or learning? Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(2), 231–248.
Batory, A., & Lindstrom, N. (2011, April). The power of the purse: Supranational entrepreneurship, financial incentives, and European higher education policy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 24(2), 311–329.
Bologna Process. (1999). The Bologna Declaration of 19 June 1999: Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education.
Bologna Process. (2001). The Prague Communiqué of 19 May 2001: Towards the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the meeting of European Ministers in charge of Higher Education.
Bologna Process Secretariat. (2016). European higher education area. http://www.ehea.info/#.
Bulmer, S. J., & Radaelli, C. M. (2004). The Europeanisation of National Policy? Queen’s University Belfast Papers on Europeanisation. No. 1/2004. http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofPoliticsInternationalStudiesandPhilosophy/FileStore/EuropeanisationFiles/Filetoupload,38405,en.pdf.
Christiansen, T. J., et al. (2001). Social construction of Europe. London: SAGE.
Corbett, A. (2005). Universities and the Europe of knowledge: Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurship in European Union higher education 1955–2005. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dinan, D. (2014). Origins and evolution of the European Union (2nd ed.). The New European Union Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2009). Higher education policies in central and Eastern Europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration, and Institutions, 22(3), 397–430.
Dobbins, M., & Knill, C. (2014). Higher education governance and policy change in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
EHEA Ministerial Conference. (2012a). Bucharest Communiqué: Making the most of our potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/%281%29/Bucharest%20Communique%202012%281%29.pdf.
EHEA Ministerial Conference. (2012b). Mobility for better learning: Mobility strategy 2020 for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/(1)/2012%20EHEA%20Mobility%20Strategy.pdf.
European Commission. (2011, September 20). Supporting growth and jobs—an agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM 2011 (567) Final.
European Commission. (2012). The EU averts funding crisis for Erasmus. Press Release. December 12, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/education/news/20121212_en.htm.
European Commission. (2013a). Erasmus+ is the new EU programme for education, training, youth and sport for 2014–2020, starting in January 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/education/erasmus-plus/index_en.htm.
European Commission. (2013b). Memo: Erasmus Programme in 2011–2012: The Figures Explained. July 8, 2013.
European Commission. (2016a). European Commission: Europe 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm.
European Commission. (2016b). Strategic Framework—Education & Training. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework_en.
Eurydice: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. (2012). The European Higher Education Area in 2012: Bologna Process Implementation Report. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/138EN.pdf.
Fargues, P., Papademetriou, D. G., Salinari, G., & Sumption, M. (2011). Shared challenges and opportunities for EU and US immigration policymakers. European University Institute and Migration Policy Institute Report.
Fulge, T., & Vögtle, E. M. (2014). Sweeping change—but does it matter? The Bologna Process and determinants of student mobility. In K. Martens, P. Knodel, & M. Windzio (Eds.), Internationalization of education policy: A new constellation of statehood in education?. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, XLIV, 936–957.
Heyneman, S. P. (2009). What is appropriate role for government in education? Journal of Higher Education Policy, 3, 135–157.
Heyneman, S. P. (2010). A comment on the changes in higher education in the post-soviet union. European Education, 42(1), 76–87.
Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna Process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 203–223.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
Martens, K., Knodel, P., & Windzio, M. (2014). Internationalization of education policy: A new constellation of statehood in education?. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Moravcsik, A. (2005). The European constitutional compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12, 349–389.
Neave, G. (2003a). On the return from Babylon: A long voyage around history, ideology and systems change. In J. File & L. Geodegebuure (Eds.), Reflections on higher education in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovenia. Twente: CHEPS (Center for Higher Education Policy Studies).
Neave, G. (2003b). The Bologna Declaration: Some of the historic dilemmas posed by the reconstruction of the community in Europe’s systems of higher education. Educational Policy, 17, 141–164.
Neave, G., & Maassen, P. (2007). The Bologna Process: An intergovernmental policy perspective. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration. Dordrecht: Springer.
Nokkola, T. (2007). The Bologna Process and the role of higher education: Discursive construction of the European higher education area. In J. Enders & B. Jongbloed (Eds.), Public-Private dynamics in higher education: Expectations, developments and outcomes (pp. 221–245). Piscataway: Transaction.
Olsen, J. P. (2009). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163.
Regini, M. (2011). European universities and the challenge of the market: A comparative analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Risse, T. (2007). Social constructivism meets globalization. In A. Held & D. McGrew (Eds.), Globalization theory: Approaches and controversies (pp. 126–147). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rosamond, B. (2002). Imagining the European economy: ‘Competitiveness’ and the social construction of ‘Europe’ as an economic space. New Political Economy, 7(2), 157–177.
Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Europeanization and the mechanics of economic policy adjustment. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 894–912.
Schmidt, V. A. (2005, December). Democracy in Europe: The impact of European integration. Perspectives on Politics, 3(4), 761–779.
Schmidt, V. A. (2009). The EU and its member states: From bottom up to top down. In D. Phinnemore & A. Warleigh-Lack (Eds.), Reflections on European integration: 50 years of the treaty of Rome (pp. 194–211). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scott, P. (2002). Reflections on the reform of higher education in central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 27(1/2), 137–152.
Spring, J. (2009). Globalization of education: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
Tyson, A. (2012, 2016). Acting Director for Strategy and Evaluation, Former Head of UnitC1, Higher Education and Erasmus, Directorate-General Education and Culture, European Commission; April 25, 2012; September 6, 2016.
Veiga, A. (2010). The moment of truth? European Journal of Education, 47(3), 378–391.
Veiga, A., & Amaral, A. (2006). The open method of coordination and the implementation of the Bologna Process. Tertiary Education and Management, 12, 283–295.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrett, B. (2017). The Dual Roles of Higher Education Institutions in the Knowledge Economy. In: Globalization and Change in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52368-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52368-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52367-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52368-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)