Skip to main content

Narrative and Place

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Place, Space and Hermeneutics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Hermeneutics ((CONT HERMEN,volume 5))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore possible intersections between place and narrative, questioning an understanding that simply associates place with space and narrative with time and infers their separation from that. After introducing two directions from which the problem can be addressed, namely the role of place for the phenomena analyzed in terms of narrative, on the one hand, and the role of narrative for the understanding of place, on the other, the text pursues the first perspective and explores the relation between place and narrative with regard to the theory of the self, ethics, the theory of action and history. The concluding section briefly discusses the way narrative in turn contributes to the understanding of place. By showing the close relation between both terms in different philosophical problem areas, the text advocates a position that avoids the exclusion of time and history from the concept of place.

The original version of this chapter was revised. The name of the author name was misspelled and affiliation was updated in the revised version. An erratum to this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_38

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Edward Soja speaks of the aim, “to spatialize the historical narrative, to attach to durée an enduring critical human geography” (Soja 1989, 1). Michel Foucault, too, proclaimed an age of space that should supersede the age of history (cf. Foucault 1998, 175).

  2. 2.

    Cf. Casey 1993, 313: “place is prior only as subsisting under these most influential modern instances of the binary oppositions Western metaphysics has posited at every step of its imperialistic course.”

  3. 3.

    An introduction defines narrative as “a basic human strategy for coming to terms with time, process, and change” (Herman 2007).

  4. 4.

    Among continental philosophers, David Carr has argued for the latter, while Hayden White advocates the first thesis, together with many others in the field of cultural sciences; cf. White 1973.

  5. 5.

    For a fundamental critique of the narrative approach, see Strawson 2004.

  6. 6.

    The German translation made by Hannah Arendt herself puts even more emphasis on place in this context. There she states that “something seems to inhere every human activity which indicates that it does not ‘hover in the air’ but possesses its own place in the world”, Arendt 1981, 90 [my translation].

  7. 7.

    Cf. Arendt 1981, 226, where she speaks of “threads” (“Fäden […], die in ein bereits vorgewebtes Muster geschlagen werden”).

  8. 8.

    On this point, cf. Carr 2013, 46: “The moral of the story is that all the knowledge we have about the past is getting in the way of a direct connection to the past, and that this can be provided only by memory: But our memory is fading, and can be restored if we return to the ‚places’ of memory.”

  9. 9.

    It is also worth asking whether this “symbolic” meaning is of the same kind in all of the examples or whether, for example, the meaning of a place like “Verdun” could not more appropriately be described as a metonymic relation.

  10. 10.

    For a different approach to a possible mediation between space and time, but also between subjective and objective time/space see Ricœur 1996.

  11. 11.

    For David Carr, place is such a rich concept especially because it contains a temporal dimension; cf. Carr 2013, 50: “Now I would like to argue that one of the things that constitutes the thickness and richness of place is that it has a temporal dimension that is entirely its own.”

References

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago/London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. Zürich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1992. The Dialogic Imagination, ed. by Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: The University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, David. 1986. Time, Narrative, and History. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Place, Memory and History. In Exploring the Work of Edward S. Casey: Giving Voice to Place, Memory, and Imagination, ed. Azucena Cruz-Pierre and Donald A. Landes, 43–51. London/New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Edward S. 1993. Getting Back into Place. Toward a Renewed Understanding of the Place-world. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time: Phenomenological Prolegomena. In Senses of Place, ed. Keith H. Basso and Steven Feld, 13–52. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Remembering. A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, Arthur C. 1965. Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figal, Günter. 2015. Unscheinbarkeit. Der Raum der Phänomenologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1998. Different Spaces. In Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, ed. James D. Faubion, 175–186. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David, ed. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Narratology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1952. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie II, Husserliana IV, ed. Marly Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Cartesianische Meditationen, Husserliana I, ed. Stephan Strasser. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. 2007. Laokoon. In Text und Kommentar, ed. Wilfried Barner. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, Jeff. 1999. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Rememberance of Place. In Exploring the Work of Edward S. Casey: Giving Voice to Place, Memory, and Imagination, ed. Azucena Cruz-Pierre and Donald A. Landes, 63–72. London/New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, Pierre. 1989. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire. Representations 26(1989): 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. General Introduction: Between Memory and History. In The Realms of Memory: Traditions, ed. Pierre Nora and Lawrence D. Kitzman, 1–20. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, Paul. 1984–88. Time and Narrative. 3 Volumes. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Oneself as Another. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Life in Quest of Narrative. In On Paul Ricœur: Narrative and Interpretation, ed. David Wood, 20–33. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Architecture and Narrative. In Identitá Differenze/Identity and Difference. Triennale di Milano XIX Esposizione Internationale, 64–72. Milan: Electa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2014. Space. In Handbook of Narratology, ed. Peter Hühn, Jan Christopher Meister, John Pier, and Wolf Schmid, 796–811. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffel, Michael, Weixler Antonius, and Lukas Werner. 2014. Time. In Handbook of Narratology, ed. Peter Hühn, Jan Christopher Meister, John Pier, and Wolf Schmid, 868–886. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, Galen. 2004. Against Narrativity. In Ratio (New Series) XVII (2004). No. 4: 428–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, Dylan. 2012. The Memory of Place. A Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2009. Ortsverschiebungen, Zeitverschiebungen, Modi leibhaftiger Erfahrung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, David, ed. 1991. On Paul Ricœur: Narrative and Interpretation. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Dan. 2007. Self and Other: The Limits of Narrative Understanding. In Narrative and Understanding Persons, ed. D.D. Hutto, 179–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Schlitte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schlitte, A. (2017). Narrative and Place. In: Janz, B. (eds) Place, Space and Hermeneutics. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics