Skip to main content

The Hermeneutics of the Urban Spatial Sociologies of Simmel, Benjamin and Lefebvre

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Place, Space and Hermeneutics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Hermeneutics ((CONT HERMEN,volume 5))

  • 1702 Accesses

Abstract

Sociology as a discipline has a long history of hermeneutic approaches to understanding the complexity of interpreting meanings and actions. However, there is less emphasis on the contribution of sociologists to theories of space and spatial theories. Social life takes place and is shaped and moulded not only by actions but the meanings and values that are attached through everyday life and practice in, through and to space. This chapter will provide a discursive introduction to the works of three seminal sociologists whose theories and analysis explicitly address the spatial dimensions of social interaction, of socio-spatial formations, of the impact and influence of the social production of space. That is, the works of Georg Simmel (the first ‘sociologist of space’), of Walter Benjamin (social and cultural critic of the city of modernity) and of Henri Lefebvre (the major influence in the spatial turn of the social sciences). Whilst I do not claim that any or all of these theorists would have identified themselves with an explicitly hermeneutic approach, philosophy or method a hermeneutic analysis can be applied to their works to elucidate the practical application of their insights and perspectives. Why taking space seriously is not only important for the social and human sciences but also why understanding space is an essential element of hermeneutic practice. Each of these theorists has an explicit focus on the city and the urban which can be treated hermeneutically as a text-analogue. That is, from the social, cultural and historical context in which we are situated we can seek to interpret and understand these theorists of space and spatial theories to analyse and explain the similarities and differences, the continuities and contrasts with our own urban times, experiences, spaces and places.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These essays appear in Frisby and Featherstone 1997 and Wolff 1950.

  2. 2.

    See chapter 3 ‘Simmel and the City Interpreted’ in Frisby 2001.

  3. 3.

    All are in Benjamin 1997.

References

  • Anderson, R.J., J.A. Hughes, and W.W. Sharrock. 1986. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, P., and F. Carreira de Silva. 2010. Social Theory in the 20th Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudelaire, C. 1995. The Painter of Modern Life. London: Phaidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 1978. Hermeneutics and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. 1997. One-Way Street. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K., K. Hircshop, S. McCracker, and B. Taithe. 2005. Benjamin’s Arcades: An Unguided Tour. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Hermeneutics and the Study of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, S. 2001. Politics, Philosophy, Geography: Henri Lefebvre in Recent Anglo-American Scholarship. Antipode 33(5): 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Understanding Henri Lefebvre. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, S., E. Lebas, and E. Kofman, ed. 2003. Henri Lefebvre: Key Writings. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. 1998. The Flaneur, the City and Virtual Public Life. Urban Studies 35(5–6): 909–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, D. 1986. Fragments of Modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Simmel and Since. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Georg Simmel. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Cityscapes of Modernity: Critical Explorations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Metropolis as Text. In The Hieroglyphics of Space, ed. N. Leach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, D., and M. Featherstone, ed. 1997. Simmel on Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giilloch, G. 2002. Walter Benjamin: Critical Constellations. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilloch, G. 1996. Myth and Metropolis: A Critical Introduction, Walter Benjamin and the City. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1988. On the Logic of the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. 2000. Objectivism in Hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30(4): 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 2005. Paris, Capital of Modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, F.J. 1991. Simmel on Social Space. Theory, Culture, Society 8: 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1971. Everyday Life in the Modern World. London: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Reflections on the Politics of Space. In Radical Geography, ed. R. Peet, 339–352. London: Methuen and Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Introduction to Modernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Writing on Cities. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minnesota: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Rhythmanalysis. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. State, Space, World: Selected Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Critique of Everyday Life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson, J. 1979. The Habermas-Gadamer Debate. New German Critique 18: 44–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, A. 2006. Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missac, P. 1995. Walter Benjamin’s Arcades. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negru, T. 2007. Gadamer- Habermas Debate and the Universality of Hermeneutics. Cultura 4(1): 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramberg, B., K. Gjesdal, and E.N. Zalta. eds. 2014. “Hermeneutics”. Retrieved 13 July 2015, from The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/hermeneutics/

  • Ricoeur, P. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge, J. 2011. What is Critical Hermeneutics? Thesis Eleven 106(1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. 2000. Walter Benjamin’s Urban Thought. In Mike Crang and Nigel Thrift, ed. Thinking Space, 33–53. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. 1967. Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, R. 1999. Lefebvre, Love and Struggle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stones, R. 2007. Key Sociological Thinkers. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1976. Responsibility for Self. In The Identities of Persons, ed. Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, 281–300. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, K.M. and Droysen, J.G., eds. 1998. The Hermeneutics Reader: Texts of the German Tradition from the Enlightenment to the Present. London: Bloomsbury Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. London: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K.H. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieleniec, A. 1997. Space and Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy Zieleniec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zieleniec, A. (2017). The Hermeneutics of the Urban Spatial Sociologies of Simmel, Benjamin and Lefebvre. In: Janz, B. (eds) Place, Space and Hermeneutics. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52214-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics