Skip to main content

Logit Dynamics with Concurrent Updates for Local Interaction Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Extended Abstracts Summer 2015

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((RPCRMB,volume 6))

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

Game Theory is the main tool used to model the behavior of agents that are guided by their own objective in contexts where their gains depend also on the choices made by neighboring agents. Game theoretic approaches have been often proposed for modeling phenomena in a complex social network, such as the formation of the social network itself. We are interested in the dynamics that govern such phenomena. In this paper, we study a specific class of randomized update rules called the logit choice function which can be coupled with different selection rules so to give different dynamics. We study how the logit choice function behave in an extreme case of concurrency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. C. Alós-Ferrer and N. Netzer, “The logit-response dynamics”, Games and Economic Behavior 68 (2) (2010), 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Anshelevich, A. Dasgupta, É. Tardos, and T. Wexler, “Near-optimal network design with selfish agents”, Theory of Computing 4 (1) (2008), 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Asadpour and A. Saberi, “On the inefficiency ratio of stable equilibria in congestion games”, Proc. of the 5-th Int. Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE’09), volume 5929 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 545–552. Springer, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. Auletta, D. Ferraioli, F. Pasquale, P. Penna, and G. Persiano, “Convergence to equilibrium of logit dynamics for strategic games”, Proc. of the 23-rd ACM Symp. on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA’11) (2011), 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Auletta, D. Ferraioli, F. Pasquale, and G. Persiano, “Metastability of logit dynamics for coordination games”, Proc. of the ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA’12) (2012), 1006–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Bala and S. Goyal, “A noncooperative model of network formation”, Econometrica 68 (5) (2000), 1181–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Berger, Cl. Kenyon, E. Mossel, and Y. Peres, “Glauber dynamics on trees and hyperbolic graphs”, Probability Theory and Related Fields 131 (2005), 311–340; preliminary version in FOCS 01.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Bindel, J.M. Kleinberg, and S. Oren, “How bad is forming your own opinion?”, Proc. of the 52-nd IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’11) (2011), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L.E. Blume, “The statistical mechanics of strategic interaction”, Games and Economic Behavior 5 (3) (1993), 387–424.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Borgs, J.T. Chayes, J. Ding, and B. Lucier, “The hitchhiker’s guide to affiliation networks: a game-theoretic approach”, Proc. of the 2-nd Symposium on Innovation in Computer Science (ICS’11), 389–400; Tsinghua University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Borgs, J.T. Chayes, B. Karrer, B. Meeder, R. Ravi, R. Reagans, and A. Sayedi, “Game-theoretic models of information overload in social networks”, Proc. of the 7-th Workshop on Algorithms and Models for the Web Graph (WAW’10), 146–161, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Corbo and D.C. Parkes, “The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation”, Proc. of the 24-th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’05), 99–107, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.A. Cournot, “Recherches sur le principes mathematiques de la theorie des richesses”, L. Hachette, 1838.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gl. Ellison, “Learning, local interaction, and coordination”, Econometrica 61 (5) (1993), 1047–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Fabrikant, A. Luthra, E.N. Maneva, C.H. Papadimitriou, and S. Shenker, “On a network creation game”, Proc. of the 22-nd Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC’03) (2003), 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Ferraioli, P. Goldberg, and C. Ventre, “Decentralized dynamics for finite opinion games”, Proc. of the 5-th Int. Symp. on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT’12), 144–155; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Fudenberg and D.K. Levine, “The theory of learning in games”, MIT Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dr. Fudenberg and J. Tirole, “Game theory”, MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.C. Harsanyi and R. Selten, “A general theory of equilibrium selection in games”, MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Hart and A. Mas-Colell, “A general class of adaptive procedures”, Journal of Economic Theory 98 (1) (2001), 26–54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.O. Jackson and A. Wolinsky, “A strategic model of social and economic networks”, Journal of Economic Theory 71 (1) (1996), 44–74.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.M. Kleinberg and S. Oren, “Mechanisms for (mis)allocating scientific credit”, Proc. of the 43-rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’11) (2011), 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F. Martinelli, “Lectures on glauber dynamics for discrete spin models”, Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics, volume 1717 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 93–191; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.L. McFadden, “Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior”, Frontiers in Econometrics, 105–142; Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Montanari and A. Saberi, “Convergence to equilibrium in local interaction games”, Proc. of 50-th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’09) (2009), 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Morris, “Contagion”, Review of Economic Studies 67 (1) (2000), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Peyton Young, “Individual strategy and social structure: an evolutionary theory of institutions”, Princeton University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Peyton Young, “The diffusion of innovations in social networks”, in L.E. Blume and S.N. Durlauf, editors, The Economy as a Complex Evolving System, vol. III. Oxford University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.H. Sandholm, “Population games and evolutionary dynamics”, MIT Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  30. DH. Wolpert, “Information theory – the bridge connecting bounded rational game theory and statistical physics”, Complex Engineered Systems, 14, 262–290; Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Vincenzo Auletta and Giuseppe Persiano are supported by Italian MIUR under the PRIN 2010–2011 project ARS TechnoMedia – Algorithmics for Social Technological Networks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Auletta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Auletta, V., Ferraioli, D., Pasquale, F., Penna, P., Persiano, G. (2017). Logit Dynamics with Concurrent Updates for Local Interaction Games. In: Díaz, J., Kirousis, L., Ortiz-Gracia, L., Serna, M. (eds) Extended Abstracts Summer 2015. Trends in Mathematics(), vol 6. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51753-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics